Literature DB >> 22164155

Structural analysis of fungal cerebrosides.

Eliana Barreto-Bergter1, Guilherme L Sassaki, Lauro M de Souza.   

Abstract

Of the ceramide monohexosides (CMHs), gluco- and galactosyl-ceramides are the main neutral glycosphingolipids expressed in fungal cells. Their structural determination is greatly dependent on the use of mass spectrometric techniques, including fast atom bombardment-mass spectrometry, electrospray ionization, and energy collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry. Nuclear magnetic resonance has also been used successfully. Such a combination of techniques, combined with classical analytical separation, such as high-performance thin layer chromatography and column chromatography, has led to the structural elucidation of a great number of fungal CMHs. The structure of fungal CMH is conserved among fungal species and consists of a glucose or galactose residue attached to a ceramide moiety containing 9-methyl-4,8-sphingadienine with an amidic linkage to hydroxylated fatty acids, most commonly having 16 or 18 carbon atoms and unsaturation between C-3 and C-4. Along with their unique structural characteristics, fungal CMHs have a peculiar subcellular distribution and striking biological properties. Fungal cerebrosides were also characterized as antigenic molecules directly or indirectly involved in cell growth or differentiation in Schizophyllum commune, Cryptococcus neoformans, Pseudallescheria boydii, Candida albicans, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Besides classical techniques for cerebroside (CMH) analysis, we now describe new approaches, combining conventional thin layer chromatography and mass spectrometry, as well as emerging technologies for subcellular localization and distribution of glycosphingolipids by secondary ion mass spectrometry and imaging matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NMR spectroscopy; cerebrosides; mass spectrometry; pathogenic fungi; structural characterization

Year:  2011        PMID: 22164155      PMCID: PMC3230030          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Cerebrosides are commonly called monohexosylceramides or ceramide monohexosides (CMH). They are neutral glycosphingolipids that usually contain glucose or galactose, with β-glycosidic linkages to the primary alcohol of an N-acyl sphingoid base (ceramide). Cerebrosides can be found in plants, fungi, and animals, although clear differences in the structure of the ceramide backbone of these organisms are observed. Galactosylceramide is present only in fungi and animals. In contrast, glucosylceramide is the unique glycosphingolipid which plants, fungi, and animals have in common. CMHs have been widely detected in fungal cells (reviewed by Warnecke and Heinz, 2003; Barreto-Bergter et al., 2004). The current literature indicates that cerebrosides seem to be present in almost all fungal species studied so far, with Saccharomyces cerevisiae representing a well-known exception together with Candida glabrata (Tavares et al., 2008). Gluco- and galactosyl-ceramides are the main neutral glycosphingolipids expressed in fungal pathogens (Figure 1). The long-chain base (LCB) 9-methyl-4,8-sphingadienine is present in almost all pathogenic fungi studied (Levery et al., 2000; Barreto-Bergter et al., 2004). Structural modifications of the ceramide moiety in these CMHs include different sites of unsaturation as well as varying lengths of fatty acid residues. LCB was first described in monohexosylceramides from Aspergillus oryzae (Fujino and Ohnishi, 1976) and was subsequently isolated from Schizophyllum commune (Kawai and Ikeda, 1985), from the plant pathogen Fusicoccum amygdale (Ballio et al., 1979), and the edible fungi Clitocybe geotropa and Clitocybe nebularis (Fogedal et al., 1986). CMHs were further characterized in lipid extracts from the fungal species Alternaria raphani (Wang et al., 2009), Aspergillus fumigatus (Boas et al., 1994; Toledo et al., 1999), Aspergillus nidulans (Levery et al., 2002), Aspergillus niger (Levery et al., 2000; Levery, 2005), Aspergillus versicolor (Boas et al., 1994), Acremonium chrysogenum (Sakaki et al., 2001), Amanita muscaria (Weiss and Stiller, 1972), Candida albicans (Matsubara et al., 1987), Candida deformans (Mineki et al., 1994), Candida utilis (Wagner and Zofcsik, 1966), Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (da Silva et al., 2004), Cryptococcus neoformans (Rodrigues et al., 2000), Fonsecaea pedrosoi (Nimrichter et al., 2004), Fusarium graminearum (Zaüner et al., 2008), Fusarium solani (Duarte et al., 1998), Ganoderma lucidum (Mizushina et al., 1998), Hansenula anomala (Ng and Laneelle, 1977), Histoplasma capsulatum (Toledo et al., 2001), Hypsizygus marmoreus (Sawabe et al., 1994), Kluyveromyces waltii (Takakuwa et al., 2002), Kluyveromyces thermotolerans (Takakuwa et al., 2002), Kluyveromyces lactis (Takakuwa et al., 2002), Lentinus edodes (Kawai, 1989), Magnaporthe grisea (Koga et al., 1998; Umemura et al., 2000; Maciel et al., 2002), Mortierella alpina (Batrakov et al., 2002), Metrilium senile (Karlsson et al., 1979), Neurospora crassa (Lester et al., 1974; Park et al., 2005), Paracoccidioides brasilensis (Takahashi et al., 1996), Penicillium chrysogenum (Peng et al., 2011), Pichia pastoris (Sakaki et al., 2001), Polyporus ellisii (Gao et al., 2001), Polyporus squamosus (Arigi et al., 2007), Pseudallescheria boydii (Pinto et al., 2002), Rhynchosporium secalis (Sakaki et al., 2001), Saccharomyces kluyveri (Takakuwa et al., 2002), Sordaria macrospore (Sakaki et al., 2001), Sporothrix schenckii (Toledo et al., 2000), Termitomyces albuminosus (Qi et al., 2001), Zygosaccharomyces cidri, and Zygosaccharomyces fermentati (Takakuwa et al., 2002).
Figure 1

Typical fungal cerebroside structure, containing a C19 sphingoid base with a C-9 methyl group, and two double bonds (Δ4, Δ8).

Typical fungal cerebroside structure, containing a C19 sphingoid base with a C-9 methyl group, and two double bonds (Δ4, Δ8). Whereas many studies have focused on the functional roles of glycosphingolipids in mammals, relatively little is known about the structures of glycosphingolipids of pathogenic organisms, and how such pathogen-derived glycosphingolipids influence immune functions of their hosts. CMHs have been characterized in fungal cells as bioactive molecules with several distinct roles. Fungal cerebrosides induce cell differentiation in S. commune, and the 8E-double bond and the methyl group at C-9 in the sphingoid base is essential for this differentiation (Kawai and Ikeda, 1982). Monohexosylceramides isolated from the rice pathogen M. grisea are active elicitors of the hypersensitive response in rice (Koga et al., 1998; Umemura et al., 2000). The presence of CMH as a structural component of the fungal cell wall was clearly demonstrated by electron microscopy of yeast cells of C. neoformans labeled with immunogold antibodies (Rodrigues et al., 2000) and by immunofluorescence of mycelium cells of C. gloeosporioides, using a monoclonal antibody to GlcCer (da Silva et al., 2004). Glucosylceramides from P. boydii, accumulated on the surface of mycelia and pseudo-hyphal forms, were recognized by antibodies from rabbits immunized with P. boydii whole cells (Pinto et al., 2002). A monoclonal antibody to the glucosylceramide synthesized by P. brasiliensis was produced and reacted with A. fumigatus conidiophore. This finding supported the idea that CMHs are preferentially accumulated on surface sites related to fungal growth, but it also suggested that they are involved in the differentiation process (Toledo et al., 2001). Using polyclonal antibodies or Mabs anti-monohexosylceramides, our group showed that CMHs were associated with fungal growth (Rodrigues et al., 2000; Nimrichter et al., 2005) and morphological transitions in C. neoformans, P. boydii, C. albicans, A. fumigatus, C. gloeosporioides, and S. apiospermum (reviewed by Barreto-Bergter et al., 2004). We now describe methods to extract neutral glycosphingolipids (GSLs) from fungal cells, techniques to separate them by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) or high-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) and, finally, strategies to structurally characterize the glycan and ceramide moieties of the GSLs.

Isolation and Purification

The methodology described herein follows the steps of purification routinely used in our laboratory for CMH extraction and purification (Boas et al., 1994; Duarte et al., 1998, Pinto et al., 2002; da Silva et al., 2004), although different methods are available in the current literature for isolation and purification of CMHs (reviewed by Barreto-Bergter et al., 2004). Fungal cells are successively extracted with chloroformmethanol (2:1 and 1:2 v/v). Extracts are combined, dried, and the crude lipid extract is partitioned according to (Folch et al., 1957). The lipids recovered from the Folch lower layer are fractionated on a silica gel column eluted with chloroform, acetone, and then methanol. The acetone and methanol fractions containing CMHs are further purified on a silica gel column, which are sequentially eluted with chloroformmethanol with increasing concentrations of methanol (95:5, 9:1, 8:2, and 1:1 v/v), and finally with 100% methanol. Fractions eluted with chloroformmethanol (9:1 and 8:2 v/v) are further purified by chromatography on Iatrobeads RS 2060 (Macherey and Nagel, Düren, Germany), using the same elution system, to provide a purified glycosphingolipid fraction. A typical example of the purification of cerebrosides is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

(A) Overview of the strategy used for purification of CMHs from fungal cells. (B) High-performance thin-layer chromatography of fungal neutral glycosphingolipids isolated by silica gel column chromatography. Lane 1: cerebroside from bovine brain. Lanes 2–6: Chloroform–methanol (95:5 v/v) fractions. Lanes 7–8: Chloroform–methanol (90:10 v/v) fractions. Lanes 9–11: Chloroform–methanol (80:20 v/v) fractions. Solvent system: chloroform/methanol ½ M NH4OH (40:10:1 v/v/v). Detection: iodine and orcinol–sulfuric acid reagents.

(A) Overview of the strategy used for purification of CMHs from fungal cells. (B) High-performance thin-layer chromatography of fungal neutral glycosphingolipids isolated by silica gel column chromatography. Lane 1: cerebroside from bovine brain. Lanes 2–6: Chloroformmethanol (95:5 v/v) fractions. Lanes 7–8: Chloroformmethanol (90:10 v/v) fractions. Lanes 9–11: Chloroformmethanol (80:20 v/v) fractions. Solvent system: chloroform/methanol ½ M NH4OH (40:10:1 v/v/v). Detection: iodine and orcinol–sulfuric acid reagents.

Analytical Techniques to Study Cerebrosides

High-performance thin-layer chromatography

Thin-layer chromatography is a popular and convenient technique for separation and identification of CMH, and is the first step in analysis of glycosphingolipids, requiring only small amounts (3–4 nM) of material (Scandroglio et al., 2009). This technique does not allow determination of chemical structures, but can give preliminary information on their structures based on chromatographic mobility, in comparison with standards (Wells and Dittmer, 1965; Scandroglio et al., 2009) and the reaction with specific staining reagents (Svennerholm, 1956; Scandroglio et al., 2009). Cerebrosides are analyzed on HPTLC plates developed with CHCl3–MeOH–H2O (65:25:4 v/v) or CHCl3–MeOH–2M NH4OH (40:10:1 v/v/v; Pinto et al., 2002; Rollin-Pinheiro et al., unpublished) and visualized through iodine vapor, which is absorbed by both saturated and unsaturated lipids (Kates, 1986), and by spraying the plates with orcinol–sulfuric acid, in which case cerebrosides give violet spots (Svennerholm, 1956).

Mass spectrometry applied to fungal lipid analysis

Mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful tool for the analysis of lipids. However, in the early days of its development, the intact lipids could not be directly analyzed by MS, since the available ionization sources produced ions by accelerating electrons electron ionization (EI), which should provide the molecules in a gaseous phase, to transfer their energy on ionization. This was the limiting factor for its application, since the molecules must have a sufficient vapor pressure to enter into the gaseous phase of the mass spectrometer’s ion source. Briefly, MS with EI was coupled to gas chromatography (GC–MS) and lipids could be analyzed. However, in order to become analyzable, CMHs should be converted to their constituent moieties (sugar, fatty acids, LCB), submitted to appropriate chemical derivatization and then identified by GC–MS. To overcome the requirements for volatilization, the glycosphingolipids were methanolyzed and their components analyzed as fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) (Duarte et al., 1998). The monosaccharide components of glycosphingolipids were analyzed by GC–MS, by conversion to alditol acetate derivatives after being liberated by acid hydrolysis (Sawardeker et al., 1965). Long-chain bases were released (LCB, or sphingoid base) from CMH by methanolysis and analyzed by GC–MS as the TMS derivatives after treatment with bis-(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide/pyridine (Zanetta et al., 1999; Sweeley, 1963; Karlsson and Holm, 1965). A simple derivatization method established by Sassaki et al. (2008) can also be employed for GC–MS identification of monosaccharides and LCB, present in glycosphingolipids. The highly energetic electrons (70 eV) in EI produce radical ions, but a secondary effect associated with EI is an intense production of fragment-ions, due to the extensive covalent-linkage breakdown promoted by the absorbed energy by the molecules. In order to overcome the tendency of fragmentation during the ionization process, other ion sources have been developed, called soft ionization methods.

Soft ionization techniques for the determination of the structure of intact lipids

The soft ionization technologies allow ionization and transferring non-volatile and thermolabile molecules to the gaseous phase without extensive production of fragments, impossible with EI. This type of source became available from 1980s with the introduction of fast atom bombardment-mass spectrometry (FAB-MS), followed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI). Another important characteristic is that these techniques allow changing the ion polarity, since it is possible to produce ions via cation or anion interactions, such as protonation, sodiation, lithiation or deprotonation, chlorination, and so on. Nowadays, variations of these techniques are also found, such as nano-ESI-MS, photospray ionization, as well as those called ambient MS, which include direct analysis in real time-mass spectrometry (DART-MS) and desorption electrospray (DESI), suitable for analysis of analytes deposited on a surface, such as with HPTLC. The ions obtained from intact molecules provide information on their molecular weight, as well as fragmentation being an important tool for structural analysis. The MS instrumentation allow separation of a specific ion and subjecting it to a fragmentation process, as occurring in collision-induced dissociation (CID) or collision-activated dissociation (CAD). This type of analysis is usually referred to as tandem-MS and the spectrometers operating in tandem mode consist of conjugated analyzers, such as triple quadrupole (TQ or QQQ), quadrupole-time of flight (Q-TOF) or the ion trap, and Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) analyzers, which allow the re-fragmentation of product ions (fragment-ions from MS/MS) usually referred to as MSn.

Fast atom bombardment-mass spectrometry

Fast atom bombardment was first introduced by (Barber et al., 1981a,b; Morris et al., 1981). The sample is dissolved in a non-volatile liquid matrix (e.g., glycerol, thioglycerol, triethanolamine), and the mixture is bombarded by a beam of accelerated atoms (typically argon or xenon). Non-volatile, polar, and thermolabile molecules, such as lipids, could be ionized directly analyzed (Murphy et al., 1982). FAB-MS is considered to be a relatively soft ionization technique, since it produces primary the molecular ion (quasi- or pseudo-molecular ions), although numerous fragments ions are typically generated. Since FAB-MS allowed the analysis of a broad range of intact molecules, it rapidly became one of the most commonly used techniques for structural characterization of lipids, including a wide variety of fungal cerebrosides, using native and peracetylated samples (reviewed by Levery, 2005). The structure of A. fumigatus CMH was elucidated, using FAB-MS in the positive mode (Boas et al., 1994). Spectra were obtained using peracetylated samples, in the presence and the absence of sodium acetate, and the main CMH from A. fumigatus was identified as 2′-N-hydroxyoctadecenoyl-1-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-9-methyl-4,8-sphingadienine. The presence of an additional ceramide containing 2-hydroxy-octadecanoic acid was reported by (Toledo et al., 1999), employing ESI-MS and ESI-MS/CID. Using peracetylated samples with positive- and negative-ion FAB-MS, other cerebrosides were characterized by our group from A. versicolor, C. neoformans, F.pedrosoi, F. solani, Fusarium sp., and M. grisea (reviewed by Barreto-Bergter et al., 2004). FAB-MS analysis of native and peracetylated samples indicated that the glycolipid from P. boydii consisted of two components that differ in their fatty acid compositions. In a negative-ion spectrum, deprotonated molecules appeared at m/z 726 and 754, consistent with monohexosylceramides containing hydroxyl-hexadecanoic and hydroxyl-octadecanoic acids, and C19 sphingadienine. On peracetylation with acetic anhydride/pyridine, [M + Na]+ ions were at m/z 1030 and 1002, indicating addition of six acetyl groups to the mass of the underivatized glycolipids, consistent with hydroxyl acid-containing monohexosylceramides (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Fast atom bombardment-mass spectrometry spectra of CMHs from . (A) Negative-ion spectrum [M − H]− of native CMHs, and (B) positive-ion spectrum [M + Na]+ of peracetylated CMHs.

Fast atom bombardment-mass spectrometry spectra of CMHs from . (A) Negative-ion spectrum [M − H]− of native CMHs, and (B) positive-ion spectrum [M + Na]+ of peracetylated CMHs. Over the past decades, FAB-MS/MS has been used to characterize sphingolipids, since it offers many advantages for structural elucidation and has high-energy CID capabilities (Domon and Costello, 1988; Pittenauer and Allmaier, 2009a,b; Ann and Adams, 1992; Ann and Adams, 1993). Evidence for the location of double bonds in the long-chain base was obtained by collisional activation of the sphingadienine fragments at m/z 276. Cleavages of the alkyl chain indicated the presence of a 4,8-sphingadienine structure, with a methyl substituent on C-9. An identical fragment ion spectrum was obtained from collision activation of m/z 276 in the FAB spectrum of the CMH from F. solani (Duarte et al., 1998) and A. fumigatus (Boas et al., 1994).

Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

In the mid 1980s, two soft ionization techniques were developed, ESI by John Fenn (Yamashita and Fenn, 1984) and MALDI (Karas et al., 1987). These techniques allowed direct analysis by MS of a great number of lipids. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry is an atmospheric pressure ionization technique, in which the sample can be dissolved in common solvents, such as methanol, acetonitrile, water, or in mixtures. The sample passes through a capillary tube, to which an intense electrical field is applied creating a spray of charged particles which are dried with the aid of a nitrogen flow and the ionized analytes are transferred to mass analyzers (Yamashita and Fenn, 1984). Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization is a desorption ionization (DI) method which deserves special attention because, besides its extraordinary sensitivity, it is efficient in producing intact molecular ions of large biological compounds. The MALDI matrix compounds are usually organic acids that have strong electronic absorption in the region of the applied laser wavelength. Ions obtained by the soft ionization processes usually appear as protonated or deprotonated species, depending on their chemical characteristics. However, it is also common to find ions produced by the combination of the analyte with different cations or anions, such as Na+ or K+ and Cl−, which are referred to as adducts. These ions are commonly present in the solvent and could aid the ionization of several polar molecules, such as neutral glycolipids. On the other hand, small amounts of specific adducts (e.g., Li+) can be added to the solvent, to increase ion production. Ions obtained from intact molecules contain information on their molecular weight, although further information is necessary to define their chemical structures. Accordingly, the majority of mass spectrometers allow the selection of a specific ion and its fragmentation. This type of analysis is usually referred to as tandem-MS (MS/MS). Spectrometers capable of performing tandem-MS consist of conjugated analyzers, such as TQ or QQQ, Q-TOF or the ion trap analyzer. Positive-ion mode ESI-MS employing quadrupole instruments has been used extensively for fungal cerebroside analysis (Toledo et al., 1999; Levery et al., 2000; Toledo et al., 2000; da Silva et al., 2004; Nimrichter et al., 2005). A GlcCer-enriched fraction of C. gloeosporioides was analyzed in the positive ion ESI-MS mode [M + H]+. Two major ion species appeared at m/z 754 and 756, as well as their corresponding fragments at m/z 736 and 738, generated by the loss of elements of water (Figure 4A). ESI-MS/MS has also been applied and major fragment-ions at m/z 594 and 592 were obtained, and assigned to 2′-N-hydroxyoctadecanoyl-9-methyl-4,8-sphingadienine and 2′-N-hydroxyoctadecenoyl-9-methyl-4,8-sphingadienine respectively (Figures 4B,C) (da Silva et al., 2004).
Figure 4

Positive ESI-MS [M + H]. (A) MS1 spectrum (B) and (C) ESI-MS2 of the ion species m/z 756 and 754, observed in (A). Cer, ceramide; Hex, hexose; w, water.

Positive ESI-MS [M + H]. (A) MS1 spectrum (B) and (C) ESI-MS2 of the ion species m/z 756 and 754, observed in (A). Cer, ceramide; Hex, hexose; w, water. As neutral molecules, CMHs can be analyzed by MS with the aid of adducts, the most common one being Na+. However, the use of other adducts could reveal more details from the structures, by evidencing fragments which could be missed. The use of Li+, as LiCl, or LiI, to aid cationization of neutral molecules containing carbohydrates has proven to be useful, improving ion detection and fragmentation provided by collision-induced dissociation-mass spectrometry (CID-MS), using less energies than other common alkali cations (i.e., Na+ and K+). ESI-MS/CID-MS of lithium adducts was applied for analysis of cerebrosides from F. pedrosoi (Nimrichter et al., 2005), A. niger, C. albicans, Cryptococcus spp., and yeast and mycelium forms of P. brasiliensis (Levery et al., 2000). More recently, ESI-MS in the positive ionization mode of lithiated adducts has been used by our group for cerebroside analysis of S. apiospermum, an opportunistic human pathogen that belongs to the P. boydii/Scedosporium complex (Rollin-Pinheiro et al., unpublished). Ions with ranging from m/z 700 to 800 were detected, with two major ion species appearing at m/z 734 [M + Li]+ and 750 [M + Li]+ (Figure 5A). Although in a different ratio, similar results were found in the analysis of glycosphingolipids from Cladosporium resinae (Figure 5B), a saprophytic species commonly found as a contaminant in fuel oil storage tanks (Lindley and Heyderman, 1985; Seifert et al., 2007). CID-MS analysis confirmed their similarities and revealed that the differences were located in the LCB moieties (Figures 6A–D).
Figure 5

Positive ESI-MS [M + Li].

Figure 6

Characteristic tandem-MS profiles obtained from lithiated CMHs from . The fragmentation indicated differences in the LCB moieties and the putative structures were depicted for each CMH species.

Positive ESI-MS [M + Li]. Characteristic tandem-MS profiles obtained from lithiated CMHs from . The fragmentation indicated differences in the LCB moieties and the putative structures were depicted for each CMH species. An ESI-MS examination of lipid extracts from F. pedrosoi (Nimrichter et al., 2005), another human pathogen, also showed the presence of an ion at m/z 750. This was interpreted as resulting from a ceramide with a LCB containing one more hydroxyl group. This hypothesis was supported by the analysis of the permethylated CMH derivative, showing a molecular, monolithiated ion at m/z 862, consistent with addition of eight methyl groups. Fragmentation of permethylated CMH suggested that the additional hydroxyl group is linked to C-4 or C-5 of its long-chain base (Nimrichter et al., 2005). However, this LCB conserves other characteristics of fungal LCBs, such as the presence of a double bond (C8 to C-9) and a CH3 group in C9, distinguishing it from phytosphingosine.

NMR spectroscopy

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a non-destructive method capable of furnishing information concerning the primary structure of cerebrosides, such as monosaccharide composition, anomeric configuration, and size of the sugar rings. The assignments of all ceramide signals could also be obtained without interference of the sugar moiety. Fungal cerebrosides have been characterized by 1D, 2-D-1H-NMR, and 13C-NMR spectroscopy as native (underivatized) or peracetylated samples. Native glycosphingolipid fractions isolated from Paracoccidioides brasiliensis (Toledo et al., 1999), Aspergillus fumigatus (Toledo et al., 1999), Sporothrix schenckii (Toledo et al., 2000), Histoplasma capsulatum (Toledo et al., 2001), dissolved in DMSO–d6/2% D2O have been extensively analyzed by a series of 1- and 2-D homonuclear and heteronuclear NMR experiments (1H-1H TOCSY, NOESY, 1H-13C HSQC, HMBC). According to the authors, this solvent presents superior solubility characteristics as compared with CDCl3/CD3OD mixtures and chemical shift reproducibility for cerebrosides without the need for derivatization. Using these techniques, a native glycosphingolipid fraction from Fusarium oxysporum dissolved in CDCl3CD3OD was recently characterized (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Two-dimensional NMR fingerprints of . (A) Overlaid representation of fingerprint assignments of partial edited HSQC and HMBC spectra; positive phase (blue) correspond to CH and CH3 carbons, negative phase (green) correspond to CH2 carbons, in (red) HMBC cross peaks; (boxes) represent glycosyl-ceramide linkage zones fingerprints. (B) Partial TOCSY (blue) and COZY (red) spectra from the anomeric region showing the main cross peaks of the carbohydrate ring, observation of the total 1H–11H axial correlations and reach the monosaccharide composition. (C–E) HSQC and HMBC slices of unsaturated carbons in ceramide moiety. (E,F) Fingerprint slices of the quaternary carbons (C-9) and amide linkage at 136.4 and 176.5 ppm, respectively.

Two-dimensional NMR fingerprints of . (A) Overlaid representation of fingerprint assignments of partial edited HSQC and HMBC spectra; positive phase (blue) correspond to CH and CH3 carbons, negative phase (green) correspond to CH2 carbons, in (red) HMBC cross peaks; (boxes) represent glycosyl-ceramide linkage zones fingerprints. (B) Partial TOCSY (blue) and COZY (red) spectra from the anomeric region showing the main cross peaks of the carbohydrate ring, observation of the total 1H11H axial correlations and reach the monosaccharide composition. (C–E) HSQC and HMBC slices of unsaturated carbons in ceramide moiety. (E,F) Fingerprint slices of the quaternary carbons (C-9) and amide linkage at 136.4 and 176.5 ppm, respectively. 1H and 13C-NMR spectra for several fungal glucosylceramides have been previously recorded as per-O-acetylated compounds in CDCl3 (Fogedal et al., 1986; Boas et al., 1994; da Silva et al., 1997; Duarte et al., 1998) and more recently in M. alpina (Batrakov et al., 2002) and F. graminearum (Zaüner et al., 2008). In the 1H-NMR spectrum of the peracetylated GlcCer of A. fumigatus, protons corresponding to a β-glucopyranosyl unit were recognized by their characteristic chemical shifts (Boas et al., 1994). The spectrum displayed one sharp doublet at δ 4.47 ppm with a coupling constant J1,2 = 7.9 Hz due to anomeric nuclei. The remaining protons appearing in the spectrum were in agreement with the β-glucopyranose structure. The structure of the long-chain base was deduced from one- and two-dimensional NMR spectra. The proton to proton COSY spectrum enabled the connectivity of the long-chain base protons to be traced between H-1 and H-11 and those of the fatty acid from H-2 to H-5. The chemical shifts of 5.30 and 5.50 ppm, assigned to the long-chain base H-3 and the fatty acid H-2, respectively, were typical of protons with acetylated OH-groups neighboring the olefinic bonds. For H-4 and H-5 of the long-chain base, we found a coupling constant of 15.3 Hz and for the protons H-3 and H-4 of the fatty acid 14.3 Hz, respectively, typical of trans-double bonds. An additional upfield resonance for the cerebrosides was that of the sphingadienine 9-methyl group which was a singlet at ∼1.545 ppm. However, the chain lengths of the fatty acid and the sphingosine moieties of GlcCer could not be determined by NMR analysis, in contrast with mass spectrometric methods (Levery, 2005). In summary, a series of CMHs were isolated from pathogenic fungi and their structures elucidated using a combination of HPTLC, FAB-MS, ESI-MS spectrometry, and NMR. Their principal structures are shown in Figure 8.
Figure 8

Main structures of cerebrosides isolated from pathogenic fungi.

Main structures of cerebrosides isolated from pathogenic fungi.

TLC overlay techniques

The TLC overlay technique was introduced by Magnani et al. (1980) and consists of resolution of the glycosphingolipid on a TLC plate, with detection of the CMH in situ using specific ligands as antibodies, bacterial toxins, carbohydrate-specific viruses, and bacteria. Crude lipid extracts containing glycosphingolipids as minor components could also be analyzed, avoiding time consuming purification procedures. It is a highly sensitive technique that only requires nanogram quantities of CMH (Meisen et al., 2011).

High-performance thin-layer chromatography immunostaining

Using anti-glucosylceramide antibodies, CMH could be identified in cell wall lipid extracts of C. neoformans separated by HPTLC (Rodrigues et al., 2000). Using an IgG 2a monoclonal antibody anti-glucosylceramide (MEST-2), Toledo et al. (2001) showed that this Mab reacts with glucosylceramide from yeast and mycelium forms of P. brasiliensis, H. capsulatum, S. schenckii, hyphae of A. fumigatus, and yeast forms of C. albicans, C. neoformans, C. laurentii, and C. albidus. The same results were observed using solid-phase radioimmunoassay (RIA). Studies on the specificity of MEST-2 showed that the epitope required for binding of this Mab with glucosylceramide would involve the β-D-Glc residue and the 2-hydroxyl group of the fatty acid from the ceramide portion of the GlcCer (Toledo et al., 2001).

New Applications in the Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Cerebrosides

Thin-layer chromatography–ionization orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometry–mass spectrometry

With the recent development of ambient MS, the lipids from different sources have been analyzed by HPTLC, and then subjected to MS using desorption techniques, such as DESI and MALDI. The coupling of complementary techniques as TLC and MS could open new avenues for knowledge of specific structural information using trace amounts of fungal glycosphingolipids. Using the TLC overlay assay, combined with infrared matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometry (IR-MALDI–O-TOF-MS), Müsken et al. (2010) carried out the structural characterization of globo-series neutral GSLs (microbial GSL-receptor), recognized by P-fimbriated Escherichia coli, the agent of upper urinary tract infections in humans. The method could be applicable for any GSL-binding non-pathogenic and/or pathogenic E. coli strain, or other microbes such as Helicobacter pylori or viruses. A detailed survey of methodological aspects of this technique is available in the comprehensive review by Meisen et al. (2011). This new methodology was successfully applied to the identification of cancer-associated GSLs in several types of human tumors (Müthing and Distler, 2010).

Imaging mass spectrometry

Current techniques used to identify and quantify glycosphingolipids require a prior extraction and their removal from biological material (cells, tissues) resulting in a loss of information. Direct tissue analysis and imaging MS are emerging technologies that can help in answering questions raised by current analytical techniques. The subcellular localization and distribution of glycosphingolipids are now beginning to be probed directly using secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and MALDI techniques (reviewed by Haynes et al., 2009). In MALDI–MS, the surface of a sample is coated with a matrix which serves to absorb the laser beam, and then volatilize and ionize the sample. For SIMS, the sample is directly desorbed by a primary ion bombardment. A simultaneous acquisition of a large number of biological compounds in mixtures, with the excellent sensitivity obtained by ToF mass analyzer, are the advantages of these techniques, when compared with others using chemical imaging (reviewed by Touboul et al., 2011).

Conclusion

This review summarizes classical analytical techniques used for the identification and structural determination of fungal cerebrosides. MS has emerged as a powerful technique for the analysis of cerebrosides, including analytical variations as FAB/MS, ESI-MS, and low energy ESI-MS/CID-MS. 1H and 13C-NMR have also been successfully used in cerebroside structural analysis. The combination of these techniques is usually sufficient for a complete structural elucidation. A detailed structural information of fungal cerebrosides is required in order to elucidate the biological role of these molecules. Also discussed here are some emerging techniques as TLC–IR-MALDI–MS and imaging MS in the analysis of glycosphingolipids.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  66 in total

1.  PURIFICATION AND PARTIAL CHARACTERIZATION OF SPHINGOMYELIN FROM HUMAN PLASMA.

Authors:  C C SWEELEY
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 5.922

2.  New glycosphingolipid containing an unusual sphingoid base from the basidiomycete Polyporus ellisii.

Authors:  J M Gao; L Hu; Z J Dong; J K Liu
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.880

Review 3.  Sphingolipidomics: methods for the comprehensive analysis of sphingolipids.

Authors:  Christopher A Haynes; Jeremy C Allegood; Hyejung Park; M Cameron Sullards
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 3.205

4.  Isolation and possible composition of glucosylceramides from Paracoccidioides brasiliensis.

Authors:  H K Takahashi; S B Levery; M S Toledo; E Suzuki; M E Salyan; S Hakomori; A H Straus
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  Fast-atom-bombardment mass spectra of enkephalins.

Authors:  M Barber; R S Bordoli; G V Garner; D B Gordon; R D Sedgwick; L W Tetler; A N Tyler
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1981-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Cerebrosides A and C, sphingolipid elicitors of hypersensitive cell death and phytoalexin accumulation in rice plants.

Authors:  J Koga; T Yamauchi; M Shimura; N Ogawa; K Oshima; K Umemura; M Kikuchi; N Ogasawara
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-11-27       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Glycosphingolipids from Magnaporthe grisea cells: expression of a ceramide dihexoside presenting phytosphingosine as the long-chain base.

Authors:  Daniela M Maciel; Marcio L Rodrigues; Robin Wait; Maria Helena S Villas Boas; Cesar A Tischer; Eliana Barreto-Bergter
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 4.013

8.  Cerebroside of the dimorphic human pathogen, Candida albicans.

Authors:  T Matsubara; A Hayashi; Y Banno; T Morita; Y Nozawa
Journal:  Chem Phys Lipids       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.329

9.  Application of acetate derivatives for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: novel approaches on carbohydrates, lipids and amino acids analysis.

Authors:  Guilherme L Sassaki; Lauro M Souza; Rodrigo V Serrato; Thales R Cipriani; Philip A J Gorin; Marcello Iacomini
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 4.759

10.  Characterization of neutral and acidic glycosphingolipids from the lectin-producing mushroom, Polyporus squamosus.

Authors:  Emma Arigi; Suddham Singh; Ardalan H Kahlili; Harry C Winter; Irwin J Goldstein; Steven B Levery
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 4.313

View more
  20 in total

1.  Practical multigram-scale synthesis of 4,6- and 4,8-sphingadienes, chemopreventive sphingoid bases.

Authors:  Hoe-Sup Byun; Robert Bittman
Journal:  Chem Phys Lipids       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.329

Review 2.  Scedosporium Cell Wall: From Carbohydrate-Containing Structures to Host-Pathogen Interactions.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rollin-Pinheiro; Mariana Ingrid Dutra da Silva Xisto; Victor Pereira Rochetti; Eliana Barreto-Bergter
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  Structural characterization and anti-HSV-1 and HSV-2 activity of glycolipids from the marine algae Osmundaria obtusiloba isolated from Southeastern Brazilian coast.

Authors:  Lauro M De Souza; Guilherme L Sassaki; Maria Teresa Villela Romanos; Eliana Barreto-Bergter
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 6.085

4.  Surface architecture of fungal pathogens.

Authors:  Marcio L Rodrigues
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  Fungal glycans and the innate immune recognition.

Authors:  Eliana Barreto-Bergter; Rodrigo T Figueiredo
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.293

6.  Antibodies Against Glycolipids Enhance Antifungal Activity of Macrophages and Reduce Fungal Burden After Infection with Paracoccidioides brasiliensis.

Authors:  Renata A Bueno; Luciana Thomaz; Julian E Muñoz; Cássia J da Silva; Joshua D Nosanchuk; Márcia R Pinto; Luiz R Travassos; Carlos P Taborda
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  The Role of Hydrophobicity and Surface Receptors at Hyphae of Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten in the Interaction with Burkholderia terrae BS001 - Implications for Interactions in Soil.

Authors:  Taissa Vila; Rashid Nazir; Sonia Rozental; Giulia M P Dos Santos; Renata O R Calixto; Eliana Barreto-Bergter; Lukas Y Wick; Jan Dirk van Elsas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Antiviral Sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerols (SQDGs) from the Brazilian brown seaweed Sargassum vulgare.

Authors:  Erwan Plouguerné; Lauro M de Souza; Guilherme L Sassaki; Jéssica Figueiredo Cavalcanti; Maria Teresa Villela Romanos; Bernardo A P da Gama; Renato Crespo Pereira; Eliana Barreto-Bergter
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.118

9.  Characterization of Scedosporium apiospermum glucosylceramides and their involvement in fungal development and macrophage functions.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rollin-Pinheiro; Livia Cristina Liporagi-Lopes; Jardel Vieira de Meirelles; Lauro M de Souza; Eliana Barreto-Bergter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Sphingolipidomics: An Important Mechanistic Tool for Studying Fungal Pathogens.

Authors:  Ashutosh Singh; Maurizio Del Poeta
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.