Literature DB >> 29863967

Need and availability of assistive devices to compensate for impaired hand function of individuals with tetraplegia.

Stephanie Wäckerlin1,2, Armin Gemperli1,2, Diana Sigrist-Nix3, Ursina Arnet1,2.   

Abstract

Context/Objective: To evaluate the availability and self-declared unmet need of assistive devices to compensate for impaired hand function of individuals with tetraplegia in Switzerland.Design: Cross-sectional survey.Setting: Community.Participants: Individuals with tetraplegia, aged 16 years or older, living in Switzerland.Interventions: not applicable.Outcome Measures: The self-report availability and unmet need of 18 assistive devices for impaired hand function was analyzed descriptively. The availability of devices was further evaluated stratified by sex, age, SCI severity, independence in grooming, time since injury, living situation, working status, and income. Associations between availability of devices and person characteristics were investigated using logistic regression analysis.
Results: Overall 32.7% of participants had any assistive device for impaired hand function at their disposal. The most frequent devices were adapted cutlery (14.8%), type supports (14.1%), environmental control systems (11.4%), and writing orthosis (10.6%). In the bivariate analysis several factors showed significant associations with at least one assistive device. Nevertheless, when controlling for potential confounding in multivariate analysis only independence in grooming (adapted cutlery, environmental control systems, type support, speech recognition software), SCI severity (writing orthosis, type support), and sex (adapted kitchenware) remained significantly associated with the availability of the mentioned assistive devices. The self-declared unmet need was generally low (0.7% - 4.3%), except for adapted kitchenware with a moderate unmet need (8.9%).
Conclusion: This study indicates that most individuals with tetraplegia in Switzerland are adequately supplied with assistive devices to compensate for impaired hand function. The availability depends mainly on SCI severity and independence in grooming.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assistive devices; Hand function; Need; Spinal cord injury; Tetraplegia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29863967      PMCID: PMC7006670          DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1479054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  28 in total

1.  Standardization of data analysis and reporting of results from the International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set.

Authors:  M J DeVivo; F Biering-Sørensen; P New; Y Chen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Upper extremity function in persons with tetraplegia: relationships between strength, capacity, and the spinal cord independence measure.

Authors:  Claudia Rudhe; Hubertus J A van Hedel
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Use of the NESS handmaster to restore handfunction in tetraplegia: clinical experiences in ten patients.

Authors:  G J Snoek; M J IJzerman; F A in 't Groen; T S Stoffers; G Zilvold
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Development and validation of a self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III).

Authors:  C Fekete; I Eriks-Hoogland; M Baumberger; A Catz; M Itzkovich; H Lüthi; M W M Post; E von Elm; A Wyss; M W G Brinkhof
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  How much equipment is prescribed for people with spinal cord injury in Australia, do they use it and are they satisfied 1 year later?

Authors:  L A Harvey; J Chu; J L Bowden; R Quirk; J Diong; J Batty; A Thompson; D Barratt
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population.

Authors:  Kim D Anderson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Computer and internet use by persons after traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Naomi Goodman; Alan M Jette; Bethlyn Houlihan; Steve Williams
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Recovery of sensorimotor function and activities of daily living after cervical spinal cord injury: the influence of age.

Authors:  Markus Wirz; Volker Dietz
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Need and use of assistive devices for personal mobility by individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jordanne Florio; Ursina Arnet; Armin Gemperli; Timo Hinrichs
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Home aids and personal assistance 10-45 years after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  T Biering-Sørensen; R B Hansen; F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.