| Literature DB >> 29861791 |
Julie Morscio1, Emilie Bittoun1, Nathalie Volders1, Eveline Lurquin2, Iwona Wlodarska3, Olivier Gheysens4, Peter Vandenberghe3, Gregor Verhoef5, Philippe Demaerel6, Daan Dierickx5, Xavier Sagaert1,2, Ann Janssens5, Thomas Tousseyn1,2.
Abstract
Up to 10 % of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients present with aggressive secondary B-cell lymphoma (most frequently diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, DLBCL) which may be clonally related to the CLL (i.e., Richter transformation, RT, 80 % of the cases) or de novo (20 % of the cases). Several genetic lesions associated with RT have already been identified, but the potential role of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been largely overlooked. In this study, we describe six CLL patients who developed a secondary EBV-positive (EBV+) B-cell lymphoma (five DLBCL, one Hodgkin lymphoma) and compare their clinicopathological characteristics to ten CLL patients with EBV-negative (EBV-) secondary B-cell lymphomas (all DLBCL). All 16 patients had a history of iatrogenic immunosuppression or chemotherapy. Eighty percent had received fludarabine as part of the CLL treatment. Most secondary lymphomas were clonally related to the previous CLL (3/4 EBV+, 7/7 EBV- cases tested). Notably EBV+ RT was associated with a trend for older age at onset (median 72 vs. 63 years, p value >0.05), longer interval between CLL and RT diagnosis (median 4.2 vs. 2.9 years, p value >0.05), and shorter overall survival (median 4 vs. 10 months, p value >0.05). These differences were not significant, probably due to small sample size. Immunohistochemical profiling suggested more frequent overexpression of TP53 and MYC in EBV- compared to EBV+ secondary lymphoma. Based on this small retrospective single center series, we hypothesize that EBV+ RT may constitute a separate subgroup of RT. Larger series are required to validate this suggestion.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Epstein-Barr virus; Immunodeficiency-related lymphoma; Immunomodulatory agent-related lymphoproliferation; Immunosuppression-related lymphoproliferation; Richter transformation
Year: 2016 PMID: 29861791 PMCID: PMC5962620 DOI: 10.1007/s12308-016-0273-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hematop ISSN: 1865-5785 Impact factor: 0.196
Fig. 1Histopathology of the brain biopsy of case 4 containing both CLL and Richter transformed CLL. (a)–(h) shows the presence of CLL in the brain; (i)–(p) shows the large cell Richter transformed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the brain. a, i HE of perivascularly localized CLL (a) and the corresponding DLBCL (i). The insets show the tumor cells at larger magnification (×400). CLL and DLBCL were positive for PAX5 (b, j); however, CD20 was more weakly expressed in CLL (c) compared to DLBCL (k). Both components were negative for cyclin D1 (d, l). CD3 staining revealed the presence of scattered T cells (e, m); however, staining for the T-cell marker CD5 demonstrated strong expression in both CLL and DLBCL (f, n). Proliferation was limited in CLL (as evidenced by Mib1 staining, g) while the vast majority of DLBCL cells were actively proliferating (g). Notably, EBER ISH revealed some sparse positive small cells in CLL (h) and diffuse positivity in the large cells (p)
Pathological features of 16 CLL cases with secondary B-cell lymphoma from UZ Leuven
| CLL | Secondary B-cell lymphoma | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Related aberrations | Related to CLL (by Ig PCR) | EBER/LMP1/EBNA2/ZEBRA | CD20 | CD5 | CD23 | CD10 | BCL6 | MUM1 | BCL2 | Mib1 | CyD1 | TP53 | MYC |
| EBV+ secondary B-cell lymphoma | ||||||||||||||
| 1 | del(11q) | Y | +/+/+/− | + | + | Part | − | − | + | Weak | 70 % | − | 5 % | 0 % |
| 2 | del(13q) | Y | +/NR/+/− | + | + | Part | − | − | + | + | 90 % | − | 5 % | 5 % |
| 3 | del(13q) | N | +/+/−/− | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | 75 % | − | 50 % | 10 % |
| 4 | ND | Y | +/+/−/+ | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | 80 % | − | 5 % | 10 % |
| 5 | del(13q), del(17p)del(13q) dem(13q) | NA | +/NA | + | NA | NA | − | Part | + | + | 85 % | NA | 5 % | NA |
| 6 | ND | NA | +/NA/NA/− | − | NR | − | − | − | + | + | NA | NA | 90 % | 10 % RS cells |
| EBV− secondary B-cell lymphoma | ||||||||||||||
| 7 | ND | Y | − | + | Weak | Part | − | + | + | + | 80 % | − | 5 % | 10 % |
| 8 | ND | NA | − | + | − | − | − | − | NR | − | 70 % | − | 5 % | 5 % |
| 9 | del(11q), del(13) | Y | − | + | + | Weak | − | − | − | − | 80 % | − | 75 % | 1 % |
| 10 | del(17p) | Y | − | + | + | Part | − | − | − | + | 80 % | − | 80 % | 1 % |
| 11 | ND | Y | − | Weak | + | + | − | − | + | + | 90 % | − | 1 % | 5 % |
| 12 | 13q | NA | − | + | + | + | − | Weak | + | + | 30 % | − | 30 % | 1 % |
| 13 | ND | Y | − | + | + | Part | − | − | + | + | 40 % | − | 1 % | 30 % |
| 14 | +12, del(17p) | Y | − | + | − | Part | − | − | + | + | 80 % | − | 60 % | 25 % |
| 15 | ND | NA | − | + | + | Part | − | − | + | + | 80 % | − | 80 % | 30 % |
| 16 | +12 | Y | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | 60 % | − | 1 % | 10 % |
CLL chronic lymphoid leukemia, EBER Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA, FISH fluorescent in situ hybridization, N no, NA not available, NR not representative, ND not detected, RS cells Reed-Sternberg cells, Y yes
Clinical features of 16 CLL cases with secondary B-cell lymphoma from UZ Leuven
| Case | Sex | Age at Dx CLL (years) | Mutation status CLL | CLL therapy | Interval CLL/s BCL (age at sec BCL), years | Diagnosis | OS (months) | State | ROD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBV+ secondary B-cell lymphoma | |||||||||
| 1 | M | 72 | ND | Chl, F | 4.2 (76) | DLBCL | 4.5 | D | Sepsis |
| 2 | M | 70 | UNM | Chl, F | 5.25 (75) | DLBCL | 1 | D | Sepsis |
| 3 | F | 65 | MUT | F, A | 4.25 (69) | DLBCL | 48 | A | – |
| 4 | M | 73 | ND | None | 1.3 (74) | DLBCL | 4 | D | Progression |
| 5 | M | 65 | MUT | Chl, F, A | 9 (74) | DLBCL | 1 | D | Progression |
| 6 | F | 58 | MUT | Chl, FCR | 7.25 (65) | cHL | 8 | D | Progression |
| EBV− secondary B-cell lymphoma | |||||||||
| 7 | F | 76 | ND | None | 0 (76) | DLBCL | 11.75 | A | – |
| 8 | F | 72 | ND | Chl | 5.4 (77) | DLBCL | 0.75 | A | – |
| 9 | M | 63 | ND | FC, FCR | 8 (71) | DLBCL | 13.5 | D | Progression |
| 10 | M | 49 | MUT | FC, CHOP | 6.2 (55) | DLBCL | 1.5 | D | Progression |
| 11 | F | 65 | ND | F, FMD | 1.6 (66) | DLBCL | 10 | D | Progression |
| 12 | M | 38 | UNM | FCR, A, alloBMT | 3.9 (42) | DLBCL | 9.5 | A | – |
| 13 | F | 57 | UNM | Chl, F, O | 8.8 (66) | DLBCL | 3 | D | Progression |
| 14 | M | 54 | UNM | F, A, alloBMT | 2.2 (56) | DLBCL | 4.5 | D | Progression |
| 15 | M | 65 | ND | Chl, FCR | 0.1 (65) | DLBCL | 1.5 | D | Progression |
| 16 | M | 75 | ND | Chl | 2.9 (78) | DLBCL | 32.5 | D | CVA |
A alive; CLL chronic lymphocytic leukemia; cHL classic Hodgkin lymphoma; Chl chlorambucil; CVA cerebrovascular accident; D dead; Dx diagnosis; F female; F fludarabine; FC fludarabine and cyclophosphamide; FCA fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, alemtuzumab; FCR fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab; FMD fludarabine, mitoxantrone, dexamethasone; MUT mutated; M male; NA not available; ND not determined; O ofatumumab, sec BCL secondary B-cell lymphoma; UNM unmutated; Y yes
Fig. 2Survival analysis of secondary B-cell lymphoma. Kaplan-Meier plot comparing overall survival of all EBV-positive (n = 6, dashed line) and EBV-negative (n = 10, full line) secondary B-cell lymphoma (a, log-rank p and Wilcoxon p value >0.05) and of EBV-positive (n = 3, dashed line) and EBV-negative Richter transformation (n = 7, full line) (b, log-rank p and Wilcoxon p value >0.05) in CLL patients