Literature DB >> 29861400

The effectiveness of respiratory protection worn by communities to protect from volcanic ash inhalation. Part II: Total inward leakage tests.

Susanne Steinle1, Anne Sleeuwenhoek1, William Mueller1, Claire J Horwell2, Andrew Apsley1, Alice Davis1, John W Cherrie3, Karen S Galea1.   

Abstract

Inhalation of ash can be of great concern for affected communities, during and after volcanic eruptions. Governmental and humanitarian agencies recommend and distribute a variety of respiratory protection (RP), most commonly surgical masks. However, there is currently no evidence on how effective such masks are in protecting wearers from volcanic ash. In Part I of this study (Mueller et al., 2018), we assessed the filtration efficiency (FE) of 17 materials from different forms of RP against volcanic ash and a surrogate, low-toxicity dust, Aloxite. Based on those results, we now present the findings from a volunteer simulation study to test the effect of facial fit through assessment of Total Inward Leakage (TIL). Four different disposable RP types that demonstrated very high median FE (≥96% for Aloxite; ≥89% for volcanic ash) were tested without provision of training on fit. These were an industry-certified mask (N95-equiv.); a surgical mask from Japan designed to filter PM2.5; a flat-fold basic mask from Indonesia; and a standard surgical mask from Mexico, which was also tested with an added medical bandage on top, as an additional intervention to improve fit. Ten volunteers (6 female, 4 male) were recruited. Each RP type was worn by volunteers under two different conditions simulating cleaning-up activities during/after volcanic ashfall. Each activity lasted 10 min and two repeats were completed for each RP type per activity. Dust (as PM2.5) concentration inside and outside the mask was measured with two TSI SidePak aerosol monitors (Models AM510 and AM520, TSI, Minnesota, USA) to calculate TIL. A questionnaire was administered after each test to collect perceptions of fit, comfort, protection and breathability. The best-performing RP type, across both activities, was the industry-certified N95-equiv. mask with 9% mean TIL. The standard surgical mask and the basic flat-fold mask both performed worst (35% TIL). With the additional bandage intervention, the surgical mask mean TIL improved to 24%. The PM2.5 surgical mask performed similarly, with 22% TIL. The N95-equiv. mask was perceived to provide the best protection, but was also perceived as being uncomfortable and more difficult to breathe through. This study provides a first objective evidence base for the effectiveness of a selection of RP types typically worn around the world during volcanic crises. The findings will help agencies to make informed decisions on the procurement and distribution of RP in future eruptions.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ash; Facemask; PM(2.5); Total inward leakage; Volcano

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29861400     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  12 in total

1.  Qualitative fitting characteristics of filtering face-piece respirators on Iranian people.

Authors:  Anahita Fakherpour; Mehdi Jahangiri; Mozhgan Seif
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2020-05-26

2.  Can respirator face masks in a developing country reduce exposure to ambient particulate matter?

Authors:  Sasan Faridi; Ramin Nabizadeh Nodehi; Saeed Sadeghian; Masih Tajdini; Mohammad Hoseini; Masud Yunesian; Shahrokh Nazmara; Mohammad Sadegh Hassanvand; Kazem Naddafi
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Factors motivating the use of respiratory protection against volcanic ashfall: A comparative analysis of communities in Japan, Indonesia and Mexico.

Authors:  Judith Covey; Claire J Horwell; Laksmi Rachmawati; Ryoichi Ogawa; Ana Lillian Martin-Del Pozzo; Maria Aurora Armienta; Fentiny Nugroho; Lena Dominelli
Journal:  Int J Disaster Risk Reduct       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.320

4.  Protecting healthcare workers from inhaled SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Authors:  John W Cherrie; Miranda Loh; Robert J Aitken
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.611

5.  Effectiveness of face masks used to protect Beijing residents against particulate air pollution.

Authors:  John W Cherrie; Andrew Apsley; Hilary Cowie; Susanne Steinle; William Mueller; Chun Lin; Claire J Horwell; Anne Sleeuwenhoek; Miranda Loh
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 6.  Last-resort strategies during mask shortages: optimal design features of cloth masks and decontamination of disposable masks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Shovon Bhattacharjee; Prateek Bahl; Abrar Ahmad Chughtai; C Raina MacIntyre
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2020-09

7.  Short Communication: Health Interventions in Volcanic Eruptions-Community Wearability Assessment of Respiratory Protection against Volcanic Ash from Mt Sinabung, Indonesia.

Authors:  Karen S Galea; Judith Covey; Sari Mutia Timur; Claire J Horwell; Fentiny Nugroho; William Mueller
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Insecticide Filtration Efficiency of Respiratory Protective Equipment Commonly Worn by Farmers in Thailand.

Authors:  Ratana Sapbamrer; Surat Hongsibsong; Manoch Naksata; Wimol Naksata
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Infection control in dental health care during and after the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.

Authors:  Catherine M C Volgenant; Ilona F Persoon; Rolf A G de Ruijter; J J Hans de Soet
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.068

10.  Covid-19: Protecting Worker Health.

Authors:  Sean Semple; John W Cherrie
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.179

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.