Literature DB >> 29861104

Improvement in quality indicators using NCDR® registries: First international experience.

Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva1, Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro2, Renato Delascio Lopes3, Thiago Andrade Macedo2, Fabio Conejo2, Antônio Cláudio do Amaral Baruzzi2, Mariana Yumi Okada2, Jose Carlos Teixeira Garcia2, Marcelo Jamus Rodrigues2, Valter Furlan2, Expedito E Ribeiro2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®) Database is commonly used for quality-improvement initiatives in North America, but little is known about the application of this tool in other regions of the world.
METHODS: All consecutive patients admitted due to myocardial infarction (MI) and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2012 until December 2015 in a Brazilian private cardiovascular hospital were included respectively in ACTION REGISTRY®-GWTG™ and CathPCI Registry®. Meetings including all hospital staff were performed quarterly to discuss every NCDR® report. Quality improvement initiatives were developed based on the reports which were also used for evaluation of changes after the interventions. The following indicators were considered a priority 1) Door-to-ECG and door-to-balloon (D2B) times; 2) PCI appropriateness; 3) length of stay; 4) delivery of guideline-based medication. Changes in the quality of care with respect to the over time were assessed using linear and logistic regression for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 1.382 patients were included in the ACTION REGISTRY®-GWTG™ and 3.179 patients in the CathPCI Registry®. In the ACTION registry, the overall AMI performance composite of quality indicators improved along the 4 years from 95.0% to 99.6% (p for trend <0.001). The percentage of appropriate/uncertain PCI in acute and elective scenario increased along the years from 91.1% and 70.9% to 96.6% and 84.7%, respectively (p for trend <0.001).
CONCLUSION: The present novel experience using the NCDR® registries as benchmarks to guide quality-improvement programs in an international site was associated with improvement in quality indicators.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease; Database management systems; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29861104     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  3 in total

1.  Cost Modifications during the Early Years of the Use of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry for Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros; John Li; Christine Tremblay; Mariana Yumi Okada; Henry Sznejder; Valter Furlan; Rafael Vasconcellos
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  Chest Pain Network with Support of Telemedicine: Impact on Reperfusion Therapy and Clinical Outcomes After 8 Years of Experience.

Authors:  Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva; Thiago Andrade Macedo; Renato D Lopes; Mariana Y Okada; Tiago Frigini; Patricia O Roveri; Rodrigo Balada; Lucas Silva de Macedo; Valter Furlan
Journal:  Telemed Rep       Date:  2021-12-22

3.  Evaluation of 1-Year Follow-up of Patients Included in the Registry of Clinical Practice in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk (REACT).

Authors:  Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva; Otavio Berwanger; Dalton Bertolim Precoma; Margaret Assad Cavalcante; José Fernando Vilela-Martin; Estêvão Lanna Figueiredo; Renato Delascio Lopes; Luiz Carlos Bodanese; Jorge Ilha Guimarães; Jadelson Pinheiro de Andrade; Angelo Amato Vincenzo de Paola; Marcus Vinicius Bolivar Malachias; Luiz Alberto Piva E Mattos; Fernando Bacal; Oscar Pereira Dutra
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.000

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.