Sunni L Mumford1, Rebecca A Garbose2, Keewan Kim3, Kerri Kissell4, Daniel L Kuhr3, Ukpebo R Omosigho3, Neil J Perkins3, Noya Galai5, Robert M Silver6, Lindsey A Sjaarda3, Torie C Plowden3, Enrique F Schisterman3. 1. Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: mumfords@mail.nih.gov. 2. Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Department of Endocrinology, Guthrie Medical Group, Sayre, PA, USA. 5. Haifa University, Haifa, Israel; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, although the association between preconception vitamin D concentrations and livebirth is unknown. We aimed to assess the association between preconception vitamin D and pregnancy outcomes among women with proven fecundity. METHODS: We did a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort from the block-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled EAGeR trial. Women aged 18-40 years with one to two previous pregnancy losses were recruited from June 15, 2007, to July 15, 2011, at four clinical sites in the USA and followed up for up to six menstrual cycles while attempting pregnancy and throughout pregnancy if they conceived. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D was measured at baseline (preconception) and 8 weeks of gestation. Outcomes of interest included clinical pregnancy, time to pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and livebirths. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs for livebirths, pregnancy, and pregnancy loss were estimated with weighted log-binomial regression. To assess time to pregnancy, we used discrete time Cox proportional hazards models to calculate fecundability odds ratios (FORs) with 95% CIs. EAGeR is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00467363. FINDINGS: 1191 women had available data on preconception 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations. 555 (47%) women were classified as having sufficient concentrations (≥75 nmol/L) and 636 (53%) as having insufficient concentrations (<75 nmol/L). Women with sufficient preconception 25-hydroxyvitamin D were more likely to achieve clinical pregnancy (adjusted RR 1·10 [1·01-1·20]) and livebirth (1·15 [95% CI 1·02-1·29]) than were women with insufficient concentrations. Among women who achieved pregnancy, sufficient preconception 25-hydroxyvitamin D, but not that at 8 weeks of gestation, was associated with reduced risk of pregnancy loss (preconception RR per 25 nmol/L 0·88 [95% CI 0·77-0·99]; 8 weeks of gestation 0·98 [0·95-1·01]). No association was observed with fecundability in women with sufficient versus those with insufficient preconception 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations (adjusted FOR 1·13 [95% CI 0·95-1·34]). INTERPRETATION: Sufficient preconception 25-hydroxyvitamin D (≥75 nmol/L) was associated with increased likelihood of pregnancy and livebirth. Increased vitamin D concentrations before conception, but not in early pregnancy, were associated with reduced pregnancy loss. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health and Doris Duke Charitable Foundation.
BACKGROUND:Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, although the association between preconception vitamin D concentrations and livebirth is unknown. We aimed to assess the association between preconception vitamin D and pregnancy outcomes among women with proven fecundity. METHODS: We did a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort from the block-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled EAGeR trial. Women aged 18-40 years with one to two previous pregnancy losses were recruited from June 15, 2007, to July 15, 2011, at four clinical sites in the USA and followed up for up to six menstrual cycles while attempting pregnancy and throughout pregnancy if they conceived. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D was measured at baseline (preconception) and 8 weeks of gestation. Outcomes of interest included clinical pregnancy, time to pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and livebirths. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs for livebirths, pregnancy, and pregnancy loss were estimated with weighted log-binomial regression. To assess time to pregnancy, we used discrete time Cox proportional hazards models to calculate fecundability odds ratios (FORs) with 95% CIs. EAGeR is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00467363. FINDINGS: 1191 women had available data on preconception 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations. 555 (47%) women were classified as having sufficient concentrations (≥75 nmol/L) and 636 (53%) as having insufficient concentrations (<75 nmol/L). Women with sufficient preconception 25-hydroxyvitamin D were more likely to achieve clinical pregnancy (adjusted RR 1·10 [1·01-1·20]) and livebirth (1·15 [95% CI 1·02-1·29]) than were women with insufficient concentrations. Among women who achieved pregnancy, sufficient preconception 25-hydroxyvitamin D, but not that at 8 weeks of gestation, was associated with reduced risk of pregnancy loss (preconception RR per 25 nmol/L 0·88 [95% CI 0·77-0·99]; 8 weeks of gestation 0·98 [0·95-1·01]). No association was observed with fecundability in women with sufficient versus those with insufficient preconception 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations (adjusted FOR 1·13 [95% CI 0·95-1·34]). INTERPRETATION: Sufficient preconception 25-hydroxyvitamin D (≥75 nmol/L) was associated with increased likelihood of pregnancy and livebirth. Increased vitamin D concentrations before conception, but not in early pregnancy, were associated with reduced pregnancy loss. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health and Doris Duke Charitable Foundation.
Authors: Enrique F Schisterman; Robert M Silver; Neil J Perkins; Sunni L Mumford; Brian W Whitcomb; Joseph B Stanford; Laurie L Lesher; David Faraggi; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Richard W Browne; Janet M Townsend; Mark White; Anne M Lynch; Noya Galai Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: A J Wilcox; C R Weinberg; J F O'Connor; D D Baird; J P Schlatterer; R E Canfield; E G Armstrong; B C Nisula Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1988-07-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexandra C Purdue-Smithe; Keewan Kim; Carrie Nobles; Enrique F Schisterman; Karen C Schliep; Neil J Perkins; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Joshua R Freeman; Sonia L Robinson; Jeannie G Radoc; James L Mills; Robert M Silver; Aijun Ye; Sunni L Mumford Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Stefan Pilz; Armin Zittermann; Rima Obeid; Andreas Hahn; Pawel Pludowski; Christian Trummer; Elisabeth Lerchbaum; Faustino R Pérez-López; Spyridon N Karras; Winfried März Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Nicole Banks; Fangbai Sun; Stephen A Krawetz; R Matthew Coward; Puneet Masson; James F Smith; J C Trussell; Nanette Santoro; Heping Zhang; Anne Z Steiner Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2021-07-18 Impact factor: 7.490
Authors: A Giustina; R A Adler; N Binkley; J Bollerslev; R Bouillon; B Dawson-Hughes; P R Ebeling; D Feldman; A M Formenti; M Lazaretti-Castro; C Marcocci; R Rizzoli; C T Sempos; J P Bilezikian Journal: Rev Endocr Metab Disord Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 6.514