Yushen Qian1, Rie Von Eyben1, Yufei Liu1, Frederick T Chin2, Zheng Miao2, Sandeep Apte2, Justin N Carter1, Michael S Binkley1, Erqi L Pollom1, Jeremy P Harris1, Nicolas D Prionas1, Madelyn Kissel1, Amanda Simmons1, Maximilian Diehn3, David B Shultz4, J Martin Brown5, Peter G Maxim5, Albert C Koong6, Edward E Graves7, Billy W Loo8. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 2. Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Institute for Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: BWLoo@Stanford.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Tumor hypoxia contributes to radiation resistance. A noninvasive assessment of tumor hypoxia would be valuable for prognostication and possibly selection for hypoxia-targeted therapies. 18F-pentafluorinated etanidazole (18F-EF5) is a nitroimidazole derivative that has demonstrated promise as a positron emission tomography (PET) hypoxia imaging agent in preclinical and clinical studies. However, correlation of imageable hypoxia by 18F-EF5 PET with clinical outcomes after radiation therapy remains limited. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our study prospectively enrolled 28 patients undergoing radiation therapy for localized lung or other tumors to receive pretreatment 18F-EF5 PET imaging. Depending on the level of 18F-EF5 tumor uptake, patients underwent functional manipulation of tumor oxygenation with either carbogen breathing or oral dichloroacetate followed by repeated 18F-EF5 PET. The hypoxic subvolume of tumor was defined as the proportion of tumor voxels exhibiting higher 18F-EF5 uptake than the 95th percentile of 18F-EF5 uptake in the blood pool. Tumors with a hypoxic subvolume ≥ 10% on baseline 18F-EF5 PET imaging were classified as hypoxic by imaging. A Cox model was used to assess the correlation between imageable hypoxia and clinical outcomes after treatment. RESULTS: At baseline, imageable hypoxia was demonstrated in 43% of all patients (12 of 28), including 6 of 16 patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy and 6 of 12 patients with other cancers. Carbogen breathing was significantly associated with decreased imageable hypoxia, while dichloroacetate did not result in a significant change under our protocol conditions. Tumors with imageable hypoxia had a higher incidence of local recurrence at 12 months (30%) than those without (0%) (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive hypoxia imaging by 18F-EF5 PET identified imageable hypoxia in about 40% of tumors in our study population. Local tumor recurrence after highly conformal radiation therapy was higher in tumors with imageable hypoxia.
PURPOSE:Tumor hypoxia contributes to radiation resistance. A noninvasive assessment of tumor hypoxia would be valuable for prognostication and possibly selection for hypoxia-targeted therapies. 18F-pentafluorinated etanidazole (18F-EF5) is a nitroimidazole derivative that has demonstrated promise as a positron emission tomography (PET) hypoxia imaging agent in preclinical and clinical studies. However, correlation of imageable hypoxia by 18F-EF5 PET with clinical outcomes after radiation therapy remains limited. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our study prospectively enrolled 28 patients undergoing radiation therapy for localized lung or other tumors to receive pretreatment 18F-EF5 PET imaging. Depending on the level of 18F-EF5 tumor uptake, patients underwent functional manipulation of tumor oxygenation with either carbogen breathing or oral dichloroacetate followed by repeated 18F-EF5 PET. The hypoxic subvolume of tumor was defined as the proportion of tumor voxels exhibiting higher 18F-EF5 uptake than the 95th percentile of 18F-EF5 uptake in the blood pool. Tumors with a hypoxic subvolume ≥ 10% on baseline 18F-EF5 PET imaging were classified as hypoxic by imaging. A Cox model was used to assess the correlation between imageable hypoxia and clinical outcomes after treatment. RESULTS: At baseline, imageable hypoxia was demonstrated in 43% of all patients (12 of 28), including 6 of 16 patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy and 6 of 12 patients with other cancers. Carbogen breathing was significantly associated with decreased imageable hypoxia, while dichloroacetate did not result in a significant change under our protocol conditions. Tumors with imageable hypoxia had a higher incidence of local recurrence at 12 months (30%) than those without (0%) (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive hypoxia imaging by 18F-EF5 PET identified imageable hypoxia in about 40% of tumors in our study population. Local tumor recurrence after highly conformal radiation therapy was higher in tumors with imageable hypoxia.
Authors: Pranshu Mohindra; Amit Sawant; Robert J Griffin; Narottam Lamichhane; Erina Vlashi; Meng Xu-Welliver; Michael Dominello; Michael C Joiner; Jay Burmeister Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Rebekah L I Crake; Eleanor R Burgess; Janice A Royds; Elisabeth Phillips; Margreet C M Vissers; Gabi U Dachs Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 6.244