| Literature DB >> 29859112 |
Bei Wang1, Qiuwang Zhang2, Ling Lin3, Li-Li Pan1, Cheng-Yu He1, Xiang-Xin Wan4, Zhi-Ang Zheng5, Zheng-Xin Huang1, Chao-Bao Zou4, Ming-Chang Fu5, Michael J Kutryk2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Achilles tendons are the most common sites of tendon xanthomas that are commonly caused by disturbance of lipid metabolism. Achilles tendon thickening is the early characteristic of Achilles tendon xanthomas. The relationship between Achilles tendon thickness (ATT) and LDL-C levels, and risk factors of ATT in patients with hypercholesterolemia, have thus far been poorly documented.Entities:
Keywords: Achilles tendon thickness; Achilles tendon xanthoma; Cardiovascular disease; Digital radiography; Hypercholesterolemia; Low density lipoprotein cholesterol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29859112 PMCID: PMC5984811 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0765-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Measurement of ATT by digital radiography. Panel (a) shows the measuring platform and ruler. For ATT measurement, the subject was side-lying with the leg and the foot forming a 90 degree angle (panel b) and the thickest part of Achilles tendon between the heel and 8 cm above the heel was measured (panel c)
Demographics and clinical characteristics of all groups
| Normal | Borderline LDL-C | hypercholesterolemia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number (M/F) | |||
| Age (years) | 56.90 ± 7.46 | 51.52 ± 9.57 | 53.13 ± 10.86 |
| Height (cm) | 161.80 ± 6.02 | 160.61 ± 6.54 | 161.78 ± 7.27 |
| Weight (kg) | 56.55 ± 5.34 | 59.00 ± 11.28 | 60.55 ± 10.21 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.56 ± 1.01 | 22.75 ± 3.34 | 23.07 ± 3.00 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 139.50 ± 19.78 | 128.16 ± 12.95 | 132.65 ± 14.78 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 86.00 ± 11.59 | 80.89 ± 10.34 | 85.33 ± 10.03 |
| ATT (mm) | 6.05 ± 0.28 | 8.24 ± 1.73* | 9.42 ± 3.63∆# |
| Comorbidities | |||
| Hypertension | |||
| Diabetes | |||
Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation
M male, F female, BMI body mass index, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, and ATT Achilles tendon thickness
* P < 0.05 compared with normal group; ∆ P < 0.05 compared with borderline LDL-C group; and # P < 0.005 compared with normal group
Fig. 2Representative images of ATT measurement in a subject with normal LDL-C. A male who was 66-year-old had an ATT of 7.5 mm (his serum LDL-C was 2.97 mmol/L)
Fig. 3Representative images of ATT measurement in a subject with borderline LDL-C. A female who was 58-year-old had an ATT of 7.0 mm (her serum LDL-C was 3.85 mmol/L)
Fig. 4Representative images of ATT measurement in a patient with hypercholesterolemia. A male who was 67-year-old had an ATT of 13.5 mm (his serum LDL-C was 5.46 mmol/L)
Fig. 5Analysis of correlation between ATT and LDL-C levels. The correlation coefficient was 0.346 between Achilles tendon thickness and serum LDL-C levels (P < 0.001)
The results of univariate logistic regression analysis
| Variable | β | S.E | Wald | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | −0.602 | 0.408 | 2.183 | 0.120 | 0.548 | 0.246-1.217 |
| Ages | 0.010 | 0.020 | 0.229 | 0.632 | 1.010 | 0.971-1.050 |
| Height | 0.062 | 0.030 | 4.160 | 0.041 | 1.064 | 1.002-1.129 |
| Weight | 0.006 | 0.011 | 0.371 | 0.542 | 1.007 | 0.986-1.028 |
| BMI | 0.196 | 0.068 | 8.271 | 0.004 | 1.271 | 1.064-1.390 |
| TC | 0.277 | 0.134 | 4.243 | 0.039 | 1.139 | 1.014-1.715 |
| LDL-C | 0.869 | 0.239 | 13.274 | 0.000 | 2.385 | 1.494-3.807 |
| HDL-C | −3.573 | 0.720 | 24.628 | 0.000 | 0.028 | 0.007-0.115 |
| Apo AI | −5.084 | 1.027 | 24.484 | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.001-0.046 |
| Apo B | −0.209 | 0.533 | 0.153 | 0.695 | 0.812 | 0.285-2.238 |
| Lp (a) | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.983 | 0.321 | 1.001 | 0.999-1.003 |
| SBP | 0.008 | 0.014 | 0.295 | 0.587 | 1.008 | 0.980-1.036 |
| DBP | 0.005 | 0.019 | 0.078 | 0.779 | 1.005 | 0.968-1.044 |
| FGL | 0.036 | 0.071 | 0.259 | 0.611 | 1.037 | 0.902-1.191 |
BMI body mass index, TC total cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, FGL fasting glucose level
The results of multivariable logistic regression analysis
| Variable | β | S.E | Wald | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 0.071 | 0.047 | 2.269 | 0.132 | 1.073 | 0.979-1.177 |
| LDL-C | 0.626 | 0.287 | 4.779 | 0.029 | 1.871 | 1.067-3.280 |
| HDL-C | −2.310 | 0.894 | 6.668 | 0.010 | 0.099 | 0.017-0.573 |
| Apo A1 | −3.363 | 1.263 | 7.085 | 0.008 | 0.035 | 0.003-0.412 |
LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol