| Literature DB >> 32309364 |
Yu-Ping Yang1, Li-Yuan Tao2, Jia-Ning Gao3, Peng Wang4, Yan-Fang Jiang1, Le-Min Zheng3, Yi-Ming Zhao2, Ying-Fang Ao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) can lead to significant disability of patients. However, whether serum lipid levels are associated with ATR is still unclear. This study aimed to examine the difference in lipid levels between patients with and those without ATR.Entities:
Keywords: Lipid; achilles tendon rupture (ATR); cholesterol; low-density lipoprotein; propensity score matching
Year: 2020 PMID: 32309364 PMCID: PMC7154433 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Figure 1Flow chart of the subject selection and matching.
Comparison of baseline characteristics between the two groups
| Variables | Case-control matching | Propensity score matching | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case (n=216) | Control (n=216) | P | Case (n=241) | Control (n=241) | P | ||
| Age, years | 37.54±8.80 | 37.53±8.78 | 0.996 | 37.26±9.38 | 36.36±12.93 | 0.437 | |
| Gender, n (%) | 1.000 | 0.873 | |||||
| Male | 195 (90.28) | 195 (90.28) | 219 (90.87) | 220 (91.29) | |||
| Female | 21 (9.72) | 21 (9.72) | 22 (9.13) | 21 (8.71) | |||
| Height, cm | 174.46±7.59 | 171.71±7.09 | <0.001 | 174.79±9.96 | 171.33±7.38 | <0.001 | |
| Weight, kg | 77.85±11.31 | 75.44±11.09 | 0.026 | 77.95±12.74 | 75.54±12.51 | 0.036 | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.52±2.88 | 25.51±2.88 | 0.961 | 25.51±3.64 | 25.65±3.40 | 0.652 | |
| Fasting glycaemia, mmol/L | 5.30±0.54 | 5.22±0.54 | 0.135 | 5.40±0.92 | 5.42±1.80 | 0.894 | |
The case group is achilles tendon rupture (ATR) patients; the control group is the healthy controls.
Differences of uric acid and plasma lipid between the two groups
| Variables | Case-control matching | Propensity score matching | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (n=216) | Case (n=216) | P | Control (n=241) | Case (n=241) | P | ||
| Cholesterol, mmol/L | 3.74 (3.41–4.19) | 4.77 (4.14–5.40) | <0.001 | 3.37 (3.09–3.59) | 4.77 (4.14–5.36) | <0.001 | |
| Triglyceride, mmol/L | 1.18 (0.84–1.72) | 1.55 (1.06–2.25) | <0.001 | 0.98 (0.73–1.37) | 1.51 (1.06–2.17) | <0.001 | |
| HDL, mmol/L | 1.07 (0.96–1.25) | 1.09 (0.98–1.31) | 0.143 | 1.08 (0.96–1.26) | 1.09 (0.98–1.31) | 0.252 | |
| LDL, mmol/L | 2.30 (1.92–2.60) | 3.04 (2.47–3.53) | <0.001 | 1.93 (1.63–2.17) | 3.05 (2.46–3.54) | <0.001 | |
Data were expressed as median (25th–75th percentile) and tested by the Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 2Comparison of plasma lipid between the two groups in case-control matching.
Figure 3Comparison of plasma lipid between the two groups in propensity score matching.
Abnormal rate in uric acid and plasma lipid of the two groups
| Variables | Case-control matching, n (%) | Propensity score matching, n (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (n=216) | Case (n=216) | P | Control (n=241) | Case (n=241) | P | ||
| Cholesterol, mmol/L | 3 (1.39) | 21 (9.72) | <0.001 | 3 (1.24) | 24 (9.96) | <0.001 | |
| Triglyceride, mmol/L | 49 (22.69) | 78 (36.11) | 0.002 | 27 (11.2) | 86 (35.68) | <0.001 | |
| HDL, mmol/L | 5 (2.31) | 8 (3.70) | 0.398 | 13 (5.39) | 8 (3.32) | 0.265 | |
| LDL, mmol/L | 4 (1.85) | 40 (18.52) | <0.001 | 3 (1.24) | 46 (19.09) | <0.001 | |
Results of the generalized linear model analysis
| Variables | Group | Height | Weight | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | P | Beta | P | Beta | P | |||
| CCM | ||||||||
| Cholesterol | 0.979 | <0.001 | −0.017 | 0.008 | 0.018 | <0.001 | ||
| Triglyceride | 0.445 | <0.001 | −0.026 | 0.008 | 0.034 | <0.001 | ||
| HDL | 0.069 | 0.005 | 0.002 | 0.306 | −0.008 | <0.001 | ||
| LDL | 0.707 | <0.001 | −0.013 | 0.022 | 0.019 | <0.001 | ||
| PSM | ||||||||
| Cholesterol | 1.327 | <0.001 | −0.001 | 0.820 | 0.006 | 0.119 | ||
| Triglyceride | 0.532 | <0.001 | −0.002 | 0.807 | 0.008 | 0.224 | ||
| HDL | 0.054 | 0.029 | −0.001 | 0.630 | −0.003 | 0.018 | ||
| LDL | 1.047 | <0.001 | −0.002 | 0.674 | 0.007 | 0.030 | ||
CCM, case-control matching; PSM, propensity score matching.