Literature DB >> 11155304

Radiographic assessment of ingrowth total shoulder arthroplasty.

J W Sperling1, R H Cofield, S W O'Driscoll, M E Torchia, C M Rowland.   

Abstract

Sixty-two primary ingrowth total shoulder arthroplasties, performed between 1989 and 1992 and with a minimum radiographic and clinical follow-up of 2 years or until the time of revision surgery (mean, 4.6 years), were reviewed. To combine data on both the distribution and the thickness of periprosthetic lucency and change in component position, criteria were used to determine whether a component was radiographically "at risk" for clinical component loosening. A glenoid component was "at risk" when a complete lucent line was present, some part of it being 1.5 mm or greater in width, or when 2 of 3 or 3 of 3 independent observers identified migration or tilt of the component. A humeral component was "at risk" when a lucent line 2 mm or greater in width was present in 3 or more of 8 zones or when at least 2 of 3 independent observers identified tilt or subsidence of the component. Four (6.5%) of the 62 glenoid components and 6 (9.7%) of the 62 humeral components were judged to be "at risk." There were no identifiable patient, disease, or surgical characteristics associated with the development of an "at risk" glenoid or humeral component. Currently, despite this very favorable radiographic assessment, we reserve the use of a tissue ingrowth glenoid component for those patients with bone loss precluding bone cement fixation with a keel type of implant. Because advantages exist for use of a tissue ingrowth humeral component, a press-fitted component with ingrowth surfaces is currently used unless bone deficiencies prevent secure fixation without cement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11155304     DOI: 10.1067/mse.2000.109384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  54 in total

1.  Total shoulder arthroplasty: are the humeral components getting shorter?

Authors:  Luke Harmer; Thomas Throckmorton; John W Sperling
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

2.  Value comparison of humeral component press-fit and cemented techniques in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Derek D Berglund; Dragomir Mijic; Tsun Yee Law; Jennifer Kurowicki; Samuel Rosas; Jonathan C Levy
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Assessment of radiolucent lines in cemented shoulder hemi-arthroplasties: study of concordance and reproducibility.

Authors:  Carlos Torrens; Santos Martínez-Díaz; Aina Ruiz; Alberto Gines; Enrique Cáceres
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian M Buck; Bernhard Jost; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty revision with glenoid reconstruction and bone grafting.

Authors:  Thomas Hoffelner; Philipp Moroder; Alexander Auffarth; Mark Tauber; Herbert Resch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Short stem shoulder prosthesis : concept and first results].

Authors:  M Loew
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Shoulder arthroplasty using mini-stem humeral components and a lesser tuberosity osteotomy.

Authors:  E M Guerrero; M P Morwood; R A Kankaria; P S Johnston; G E Garrigues
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-06-01

8.  Clinical and radiological results of a cementless short stem shoulder prosthesis at minimum follow-up of two years.

Authors:  Marc Schnetzke; Sebastian Coda; Gilles Walch; Markus Loew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Derek Berglund; Rushabh Vakharia; Paul DeVito; Dimitri S Tahal; Dragomir Mijc; Bijan Ameri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Comparison of shoulder replacement to treat osteoarthritis secondary to instability surgery and primary osteoarthritis: a retrospective controlled study of patient outcomes.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Simone Cerciello; Stefano Marenco; Elisabetta Fabbri; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.