| Literature DB >> 29858702 |
Jing He1, Xing Wang2, Xiao-Bo Yin2, Qiang Li2, Xia Li2, Yun-Fei Zhang2, Yu Deng3.
Abstract
High content of lipids in food waste could restrict digestion rate and give rise to the accumulation of long chain fatty acids in anaerobic digester. In the present study, using waste cooking oil skimmed from food waste as the sole carbon source, the effect of organic loading rate (OLR) on the methane production and microbial community dynamics were well investigated. Results showed that stable biomethane production was obtained at an organic loading rate of 0.5-1.5 g VS L-1 days-1. The specific biogas/methane yield values at OLR of 1.0 were 1.44 ± 0.15 and 0.98 ± 0.11 L g VS-1, respectively. The amplicon pyrosequencing revealed the distinct microbial succession in waste cooking oil AD reactors. Acetoclastic methanogens belonging to the genus Methanosaeta were the most dominant archaea, while the genera Syntrophomona, Anaerovibrio and Synergistaceae were the most common bacteria during AD process. Furthermore, redundancy analysis indicated that OLR showed more significant effect on the bacterial communities than that of archaeal communities. Additionally, whether the OLR of lipids increased had slight influence on the acetate fermentation pathway.Entities:
Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Biomethane; Microbial community; Organic loading rate; Waste cooking oil
Year: 2018 PMID: 29858702 PMCID: PMC5984615 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0623-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
The influent FOG, VSLR and HRT in the feed versus time for the digester
| Days | FOG VSLR (g VS L−1 day−1) | HRT (day) | FOG daily added (g) | Water daily added (mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–50 | 0.5 (0.05) | 100 | 1.5 | 28.5 |
| 51–61 | 0.5 (0.05) | 10 | 1.5 | 298.5 |
| 62–77 | 1.0 (0.1) | 10 | 3.0 | 297 |
| 78–91 | 1.5 (0.1) | 10 | 4.5 | 295.5 |
| 92–103 | 2.0 (0.1) | 10 | 6.0 | 294 |
| 104–113 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 300 |
Values in parentheses indicate one standard deviation
Fig. 1Evolution of biogas/methane yield (a), volumetric biogas/methane production rate (b) and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) (c, d) in reactors with elevated OLR
Statistics analysis of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene libraries obtained from the pyrosequencing
| Sample ID | ACE | Chao1 | Coverage | Shannon | Simpson | Sequences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T51 | 306 | 311 | 0.99 | 3.16 | 0.09 | 36739 |
| T61 | 330 | 334 | 0.99 | 3.92 | 0.04 | 34919 |
| T68 | 329 | 330 | 0.99 | 3.76 | 0.04 | 28493 |
| T78 | 317 | 322 | 0.99 | 3.60 | 0.06 | 41490 |
| T82 | 323 | 318 | 0.99 | 3.47 | 0.05 | 28646 |
| T92 | 272 | 392 | 0.99 | 2.39 | 0.21 | 39491 |
| T98 | 259 | 259 | 0.99 | 2.82 | 0.14 | 29366 |
| T104 | 270 | 260 | 0.99 | 2.13 | 0.31 | 36147 |
| T113 | 304 | 310 | 0.99 | 3.03 | 0.09 | 42475 |
All values were calculated at 0.03 distance limit
Fig. 2Taxonomic compositions of bacterial communities at phylum level in each sample retrieved from pyrosequencing. The number in the sample names represented the day when sampling occurred
Fig. 3Hierarchical cluster analysis of microbial communities among the 8 samples. The Y-axis is the clustering of the top 100 abundant genus. Different samples were clustered based on complete linkage method
Fig. 4Taxonomic compositions of methanogens at the genus level in each sample retrieved from pyrosequencing. The sample was named as in Fig. 2
Fig. 5Triplots of RDA ordination diagrams of TOP10 archaeal community (a) and TOP10 bacterial community (b) with total VFA, acetate, propionate, palmitic acid and volumetric organic loading rate (here VLR = OLR)
Characterization of microbial community of AD with LCFA or FOG
| References | Substrate | AD pattern | Method | Methanogenic archaea community | Bacterial community |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shigematsu et al. ( | Oleic and palmitic acids | Semi-continuous, CSTR, 37 °C | DGGE | Dominant genera | Dominant phyla |
| Sousa et al. ( | MixLCFA, Palmitate 32–48%; Myristate 11–15%; oleate 23–26% | Batch, 35 °C | DGGE | Dominant genera | Dominant phyla(80%) |
| Baserba et al. ( | Oleate | Semi-continuous, CSTR, 55 °C | DGGE | Dominant genera | Dominant phyla |
| Yang et al. ( | FOG and sewage sludge | Semi-continuous, CSTR, 35 °C | High-throughput pyrosequencing | Dominant genera | Dominant phyla: |
| Ziels et al. ( | FOG and municipal sludge | Semi-continuous, CSTR, 35 °C | High-throughput pyrosequencing +qPCR | Dominant genera | Dominant genera |
| Present study | FOG solely | Semi-continuous, CSTR, 35 °C | High-throughput pyrosequencing | Dominant genera | Dominant genera |
Fig. 6Relative abundance of the lipolytic bacteria and three mainly syntrophy bacteria at the time of 51st, 68th, 78th, 82nd, 92nd, 98th, 104th and 113th days