Literature DB >> 29858655

Implant preloading in extension reduces spring length change in dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: a biomechanical study on passive kinematics of the knee.

Janosch Häberli1, Benjamin Voumard2, Clemens Kösters3, Daniel Delfosse4, Philipp Henle5, Stefan Eggli5, Philippe Zysset2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) is a primary repair technique for acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. For internal bracing of the sutured ACL, a metal spring with 8 mm maximum length change is preloaded with 60-80 N and fixed to a high-strength polyethylene braid. The bulky tibial hardware results in bone loss and may cause local discomfort with the necessity of hardware removal. The technique has been previously investigated biomechanically; however, the amount of spring shortening during movement of the knee joint is unknown. Spring shortening is a crucial measure, because it defines the necessary dimensions of the spring and, therefore, the overall size of the implant.
METHODS: Seven Thiel-fixated human cadaveric knee joints were subjected to passive range of motion (flexion/extension, internal/external rotation in 90° flexion, and varus/valgus stress in 0° and 20° flexion) and stability tests (Lachman/KT-1000 testing in 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° flexion) in the ACL-intact, ACL-transected, and DIS-repaired state. Kinematic data of femur, tibia, and implant spring were recorded with an optical measurement system (Optotrak) and the positions of the bone tunnels were assessed by computed tomography. Length change of bone tunnel distance as a surrogate for spring shortening was then computed from kinematic data. Tunnel positioning in a circular zone with r = 5 mm was simulated to account for surgical precision and its influence on length change was assessed.
RESULTS: Over all range of motion and stability tests, spring shortening was highest (5.0 ± 0.2 mm) during varus stress in 0° knee flexion. During flexion/extension, spring shortening was always highest in full extension (3.8 ± 0.3 mm) for all specimens and all simulations of bone tunnels. Tunnel distance shortening was highest (0.15 mm/°) for posterior femoral and posterior tibial tunnel positioning and lowest (0.03 mm/°) for anterior femoral and anterior tibial tunnel positioning.
CONCLUSION: During passive flexion/extension, the highest spring shortening was consistently measured in full extension with a continuous decrease towards flexion. If preloading of the spring is performed in extension, the spring can be downsized to incorporate a maximum length change of 5 mm resulting in a smaller implant with less bone sacrifice and, therefore, improved conditions in case of revision surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL repair; Anterior tibial translation; Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization; Knee kinematics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29858655     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5002-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  25 in total

1.  Enhanced histologic repair in a central wound in the anterior cruciate ligament with a collagen-platelet-rich plasma scaffold.

Authors:  Martha M Murray; Kurt P Spindler; Percy Ballard; Tyler P Welch; David Zurakowski; Lillian B Nanney
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  A prospective, randomized study of three surgical techniques for treatment of acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  L Engebretsen; P Benum; O Fasting; A Mølster; T Strand
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Tension changes within the bundles of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at different knee flexion angles: a study using a 3-dimensional finite element model.

Authors:  Heon Young Kim; Young-Jin Seo; Hak-Jin Kim; Trung Nguyenn; Nagraj S Shetty; Yon-Sik Yoo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method.

Authors:  M Bernard; P Hertel; H Hornung; T Cierpinski
Journal:  Am J Knee Surg       Date:  1997

5.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Isometry is Affected by the Orientation of the Femoral Tunnel.

Authors:  Gregg M Ebersole; Paul Eckerle; Lutul D Farrow; Adnan Cutuk; Gary Bledsoe; Scott Kaar
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 6.  The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years.

Authors:  Pierre Chambat; Christian Guier; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Jean-Marie Fayard; Mathieu Thaunat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comparison of 2 femoral tunnel locations in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Matthew D Driscoll; Gene P Isabell; Michael A Conditt; Sabir K Ismaily; Daniel C Jupiter; Philip C Noble; Walter R Lowe
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Registration accuracy enhancement of a surgical navigation system for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A phantom and cadaveric study.

Authors:  Youngjun Kim; Byung Hoon Lee; Kinde Mekuria; Hyunchul Cho; Sehyung Park; Joon Ho Wang; Deukhee Lee
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Dynamic augmentation restores anterior tibial translation in ACL suture repair: a biomechanical comparison of non-, static and dynamic augmentation techniques.

Authors:  Roy A G Hoogeslag; Reinoud W Brouwer; Rianne Huis In 't Veld; Joanna M Stephen; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a Dacron prosthesis. The frequency of osteoarthritis after seven to eleven years.

Authors:  W Maletius; J Gillquist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.