Literature DB >> 26190786

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Isometry is Affected by the Orientation of the Femoral Tunnel.

Gregg M Ebersole1, Paul Eckerle1, Lutul D Farrow2, Adnan Cutuk1, Gary Bledsoe3, Scott Kaar1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft length and tension throughout knee range of motion with transtibial, anteromedial (AM) portal, and all-epiphyseal drilling techniques with suspensory and apical femoral fixation.
METHODS: The three different femoral tunnel drilling techniques using the same intra-articular starting point within the center of the femoral footprint were performed on fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens. All groups underwent standard tibial drilling in the center of the ACL tibial footprint. FiberWire (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL) was used to simulate anatomic single bundle reconstructions. Changes in graft length and tension were measured at knee flexion angles of 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 135 degrees.
RESULTS: Graft length and tension decreased from 0 through 60 degrees and subsequently increased from 90 to 135 degrees for all groups. The transtibial, AM portal suspensory, and apical fixation groups were similar. However, the all-epiphyseal tunnel with suspensory fixation had a significantly increased change in length (90, 120, and 135 degrees) and tension (120 and 135 degrees).
CONCLUSION: Transtibial and AM portal suspensory fixation and apical fixation demonstrate similar changes in length and tension throughout knee range of motion. The all-epiphyseal tunnel with suspensory fixation was associated with greater length and tension changes at higher degrees of knee flexion. All techniques demonstrated decreased graft length and tension with knee flexion to 60 degrees after which they increased with further knee flexion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ACL graft length and tension change throughout knee range of motion and also depend on femoral tunnel orientation and fixation type. The use of an all-epiphyseal tunnel with suspensory fixation should be studied further for evidence of graft elongation. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26190786     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1554926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  4 in total

1.  Implant preloading in extension reduces spring length change in dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: a biomechanical study on passive kinematics of the knee.

Authors:  Janosch Häberli; Benjamin Voumard; Clemens Kösters; Daniel Delfosse; Philipp Henle; Stefan Eggli; Philippe Zysset
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Drilling through anteromedial portal with a femoral aiming device ensures a sufficient length and a proper graft position, and prevents posterior wall breakage during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Hasan Bombaci; Faruk Aykanat
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-04-28

3.  Transtibial Versus Anteromedial Portal ACL Reconstruction: Is a Hybrid Approach the Best?

Authors:  Jonathan K Jennings; Daniel P Leas; James E Fleischli; Donald F D'Alessandro; Richard D Peindl; Dana P Piasecki
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-08-07

4.  Interbundle Impingement Pressure in Individualized and Nonindividualized Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Daqiang Liang; Lei Yang; Sheng Li; Zhihe Qiu; Qihuang Qin; Xinzhi Liang; Haifeng Liu; Kan Ouyang; Jianyi Xiong; Daping Wang; Wei Lu; Mingjin Zhong; Ying Li; Hao Li; Wenzhe Feng; Kang Chen; Liangquan Peng; Weiming Zhu
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.