Literature DB >> 29858468

What works to promote walking at the population level? A systematic review.

Charlie Foster1, Paul Kelly2, Hamish A B Reid3, Nia Roberts4, Elaine M Murtagh5, David K Humphreys6, Jenna Panter7, Karen Milton8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Interventions to promote walking have focused on individual or group-based approaches, often via the randomised controlled trial design. Walking can also be promoted using population health approaches. We systematically reviewed the effectiveness of population approaches to promote walking among individuals and populations.
DESIGN: A systematic review. DATA SOURCES: 10 electronic databases searched from January 1990 to March 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligibility criteria include pre-experimental and postexperimental studies of the effects of population interventions to change walking, and the effects must have been compared with a 'no intervention', or comparison group/area/population, or variation in exposure; duration of ≥12 months of follow up; participants in free-living populations; and English-language articles.
RESULTS: 12 studies were identified from mostly urban high-income countries (one focusing on using tax, incentivising the loss of parking spaces; and one using policy only, permitting off-leash dogs in city parks). Five studies used mass media with either environment (n=2) or community (n=3) approaches. Four studies used environmental changes that were combined with policies. One study had scaled up school-based approaches to promote safe routes to schools. We found mass media, community initiatives and environmental change approaches increased walking (range from 9 to 75 min/week). © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  public health; review; walking

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29858468      PMCID: PMC6258897          DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  26 in total

1.  Walking to health.

Authors:  A E Hardman; J N Morris
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Population approaches to improve diet, physical activity, and smoking habits: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Ashkan Afshin; Neal L Benowitz; Vera Bittner; Stephen R Daniels; Harold A Franch; David R Jacobs; William E Kraus; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Debra A Krummel; Barry M Popkin; Laurie P Whitsel; Neil A Zakai
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Longitudinal trends in gasoline price and physical activity: the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Ningqi Hou; Barry M Popkin; David R Jacobs; Yan Song; David K Guilkey; Ka He; Cora E Lewis; Penny Gordon-Larsen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  A community-based approach to promoting walking in rural areas.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Elizabeth A Baker; Rutha L Boyd; Nicole M Caito; Katie Duggan; Robyn A Housemann; Matthew W Kreuter; Tonya Mitchell; Freda Motton; Cynthia Pulley; Thomas L Schmid; Dorothy Walton
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Reis; Deborah Salvo; David Ogilvie; Estelle V Lambert; Shifalika Goenka; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  New walking and cycling routes and increased physical activity: one- and 2-year findings from the UK iConnect Study.

Authors:  Anna Goodman; Shannon Sahlqvist; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity.

Authors:  Philip R A Baker; Daniel P Francis; Jesus Soares; Alison L Weightman; Charles Foster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-05

8.  Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016.

Authors:  David K Humphreys; Jenna Panter; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 9.  Walking Cadence to Exercise at Moderate Intensity for Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  J Slaght; M Sénéchal; T J Hrubeniuk; A Mayo; D R Bouchard
Journal:  J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp)       Date:  2017-03-28

10.  Changes in visitor profiles and activity patterns following dog supportive modifications to parks: A natural experiment on the health impact of an urban policy.

Authors:  Gavin R McCormack; Taryn M Graham; Kenda Swanson; Alessandro Massolo; Melanie J Rock
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2016-04-22
View more
  7 in total

1.  Socio-Ecological Natural Experiment with Randomized Controlled Trial to Promote Active Commuting to Work: Process Evaluation, Behavioral Impacts, and Changes in the Use and Quality of Walking and Cycling Paths.

Authors:  Minna Aittasalo; Johanna Tiilikainen; Kari Tokola; Jaana Suni; Harri Sievänen; Henri Vähä-Ypyä; Tommi Vasankari; Timo Seimelä; Pasi Metsäpuro; Charlie Foster; Sylvia Titze
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  "Let's Talk about Physical Activity": Understanding the Preferences of Under-Served Communities when Messaging Physical Activity Guidelines to the Public.

Authors:  James Nobles; Clare Thomas; Zoe Banks Gross; Malcolm Hamilton; Zoe Trinder-Widdess; Christopher Speed; Andy Gibson; Rosie Davies; Michelle Farr; Russell Jago; Charlie Foster; Sabi Redwood
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Group Outdoor Health Walks Using Activity Trackers: Measurement and Implementation Insight from a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Katherine N Irvine; Melissa R Marselle; Alan Melrose; Sara L Warber
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Centre for the Promotion of Physical Activity and Health (CAPAS-City): A Pyrenean Cross-Cultural Structure to Lead the Way in the Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Multilevel Physical Activity Interventions.

Authors:  Javier Zaragoza Casterad; Javier Sevil-Serrano; Julien E Bois; Eduardo Generelo; Léna Lhuisset; Alberto Aibar-Solana
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  A socio-ecological approach to reduce the physical activity drop-out ratio in primary care-based patients with type 2 diabetes: the SENWI study protocol for a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Guillem Jabardo-Camprubí; Judit Bort-Roig; Rafel Donat-Roca; Raimon Milà-Villarroel; Mercè Sitjà-Rabert; Jim McKenna; Anna Puig-Ribera
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 2.728

6.  Domain-specific physical activity and affective wellbeing among adolescents: an observational study of the moderating roles of autonomous and controlled motivation.

Authors:  Rhiannon Lee White; Philip D Parker; David R Lubans; Freya MacMillan; Rebecca Olson; Thomas Astell-Burt; Chris Lonsdale
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Time spent cycling, walking, running, standing and sedentary: a cross-sectional analysis of accelerometer-data from 1670 adults in the Copenhagen City Heart Study : Physical behaviours among 1670 Copenhageners.

Authors:  Melker Staffan Johansson; Mette Korshøj; Peter Schnohr; Jacob Louis Marott; Eva Irene Bossano Prescott; Karen Søgaard; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.