Literature DB >> 29858399

Correlation between angiographic stenosis and physiologic venous sinus outflow obstruction in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

James L West1, Garret P Greeneway1, Rebecca M Garner1, Carol A Aschenbrenner2, Jasmeet Singh3, Stacey Q Wolfe1, Kyle M Fargen1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between degree of angiographic venous sinus stenosis and the trans-stenosis pressure gradient magnitude in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is poorly understood. The present study aimed to assess the utility of angiography, venography, and non-invasive imaging (MRV or CTV) for the diagnosis and characterization of clinically significant VSS.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed to identify patients with medically refractory IIH who were evaluated by angiography and venous manometry for the presence of VSS with associated clinically significant pressure gradient. Angiographic stenosis was measured by two independent raters using novel methodology.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients met inclusion criteria for the study. In total, 70% of patients had clinically significant pressure gradients and were selected for stenting. The optimal percentage stenosis for detection of a significant pressure gradient was 34% stenosis on venous phase arteriography (sensitivity 0.81 and specificity 0.91) and 31% stenosis on venography (0.92 and 0.73). For every 10% increase in stenosis, an approximate increase in pressure gradient of 3.5 mmHg is seen. MRV/CTV had a calculated sensitivity of 0.42, and a negative predictive value of 22%.
CONCLUSION: The degree of stenosis predictive of a clinically significant pressure gradient (30-35%) in the venous sinuses is considerably lower than the arterial stenosis at which pathologic hemodynamic alterations occur. While highly predictive of a venous pressure gradient when a stenosis is identified, non-invasive imaging does not appear to be a suitable diagnostic evaluation for the purpose of ruling out clinically significant cerebral VSS. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artery; mri; stenosis; vein

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29858399     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cerebral Venous Outflow Implications in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension-From Physiopathology to Treatment.

Authors:  Sorin Tuță
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

Review 2.  Exploring The Current Management Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension, And Understanding The Role Of Dural Venous Sinus Stenting.

Authors:  Sam P Gurney; Sateesh Ramalingam; Alan Thomas; Alex J Sinclair; Susan P Mollan
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2020-01-14

3.  The Relationships Among Transverse Sinus Stenosis Measured by CT Venography, Venous Trans-stenotic Pressure Gradient and Intracranial Pressure in Patients With Unilateral Venous Pulsatile Tinnitus.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Qiu; Pengfei Zhao; Xiaoshuai Li; Heyu Ding; Han Lv; Rong Zeng; Guopeng Wang; Long Jin; Zhenghan Yang; Shusheng Gong; Zhenchang Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  Advances in the Understanding of the Complex Role of Venous Sinus Stenosis in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Kexin Zhao; Wenjing Gu; Chunmei Liu; Derui Kong; Chong Zheng; Wei Chen; Xuewei Li; Yuchen Liang; Hongwei Zhou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.119

5.  A proposed framework for cerebral venous congestion.

Authors:  Anirudh Arun; Matthew R Amans; Nicholas Higgins; Waleed Brinjikji; Mithun Sattur; Sudhakar R Satti; Peter Nakaji; Mark Luciano; Thierry Agm Huisman; Abhay Moghekar; Vitor M Pereira; Ran Meng; Kyle Fargen; Ferdinand K Hui
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-07-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.