Literature DB >> 29858397

Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery and basilar apex treated by endovascular techniques: a multicentre, core lab adjudicated study evaluating safety and durability of occlusion (BRANCH).

Reade A De Leacy1, Kyle M Fargen2, Justin R Mascitelli1, Johanna Fifi1, Lena Turkheimer1, Xiangnan Zhang1, Aman B Patel3, Matthew J Koch3, Aditya S Pandey4, D Andrew Wilkinson4, Julius Griauzde4, Robert F James5, Enzo M Fortuny5, Aurora Cruz5, Alan Boulos6, Emad Nourollah-Zadeh6, Alexandra Paul6, Eric Sauvageau7, Ricardo Hanel7, Pedro Aguilar-Salinas7, Roberta L Novakovic8, Babu G Welch8, Ranyah Almardawi9, Gaurav Jindal9, Harish Shownkeen10, Elad I Levy11, Adnan H Siddiqui11, J Mocco1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: BRANCH (wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery and basilar apex treated by endovascular techniques) is a multicentre, retrospective study comparing core lab evaluation of angiographic outcomes with self-reported outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients were enrolled from 10 US centres, aged between 18 and 85 with unruptured wide-neck middle cerebral artery (MCA) or basilar apex aneurysms treated endovascularly. Patient demographics, aneurysm morphology, procedural information, mortality and morbidity data and core lab and self-reported modified Raymond Roy (RR) outcomes were obtained.
RESULTS: 115 patients met inclusion criteria. Intervention-related mortality and significant morbidity rates were 1.7% (2/115) and 5.8% (6/103) respectively. Core lab adjudicated RR1 and 2 occlusion rates at follow-up were 30.6% and 32.4% respectively. The retreatment rate within the follow-up window was 10/115 (8.7%) and in stent stenosis at follow-up was 5/63 (7.9%). Self-reporting shows a statistically significant direction to angiographic RR one outcomes at follow-up compared with core lab evaluation, with OR 1.75 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.83).
CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of wide-neck MCA and basilar apex aneurysms resulted in a core lab adjudicated RR1 occlusion rate of 30.6%. Self-reported results at follow-up favour better angiographic outcomes, with OR 1.75 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.83). These data demonstrate the need for novel endovascular devices specifically designed to treat complex intracranial aneurysms, as well as the importance of core lab adjudication in assessing outcomes in such a trial. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneurysm; balloon; coil; intervention; stent

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29858397     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  18 in total

1.  Using the pCANvas neck-bridging device in treating a wide-necked aneurysm of the basilar tip.

Authors:  Stanimir Sirakov; Adriana Panayotova; Alexander Sirakov; Marin Penkov; Krasimir Minkin; Hristo Hristov
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2019-04-03

2.  Residuals, recurrences and re-treatment after endovascular repair of intracranial aneurysms: A retrospective methodological comparison.

Authors:  Jens J Froelich; Nicholas Cheung; Johan Ab de Lange; Jessica Monkhorst; Michael W Carr; Reade DeLeacy
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Factors Associated With Decreased Accuracy of Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarct Scoring Among Neurointerventionalists During Thrombectomy.

Authors:  Elliot Pressman; Muhammad Waqas; Victoria Sands; Adnan Siddiqui; Kenneth Snyder; Jason Davies; Elad Levy; Ciprian Ionita; Waldo Guerrero; Zeguang Ren; Maxim Mokin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Differential Subsampling with Cartesian Ordering-MRA for Classifying Residual Treated Aneurysms.

Authors:  P Shahrouki; R Gupta; P Belani; A Chien; A H Doshi; R De Leacy; J T Fifi; J Mocco; K Nael
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 4.966

5.  Long-Term Outcomes of the WEB Device for Treatment of Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysms.

Authors:  M Fujimoto; I Lylyk; C Bleise; P Albiña; J Chudyk; P Lylyk
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  WEB Device Shape Changes in Elastase-Induced Aneurysms in Rabbits.

Authors:  Y Ding; D Dai; A Rouchaud; K Janot; S Asnafi; D F Kallmes; R Kadirvel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Volume-based sizing of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device: A preliminary assessment of a novel method for device size selection.

Authors:  Kevin A Shah; Timothy G White; Ina Teron; Thomas Link; Amir R Dehdashti; Jeffrey M Katz; Henry H Woo
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 1.764

8.  Use of quantitative angiographic methods with a data-driven model to evaluate reperfusion status (mTICI) during thrombectomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Mahdi Shiraz Bhurwani; Kenneth V Snyder; Muhammad Waqas; Maxim Mokin; Ryan A Rava; Alexander R Podgorsak; Felix Chin; Jason M Davies; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.995

Review 9.  How to WEB: a practical review of methodology for the use of the Woven EndoBridge.

Authors:  Nitin Goyal; Daniel Hoit; Julie DiNitto; Lucas Elijovich; David Fiorella; Laurent Pierot; Saleh Lamin; Laurent Spelle; Isil Saatci; Saru Cekirge; Adam S Arthur
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.836

10.  Technical aspects of combined intrasaccular and endoluminal flow diversion.

Authors:  Timothy G White; Kevin Shah; Justin Turpin; Thomas Link; Amir R Dehdashti; Jeffrey M Katz; Henry H Woo
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 1.764

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.