M Fujimoto1,2, I Lylyk2, C Bleise2, P Albiña3, J Chudyk2, P Lylyk2. 1. From the Department of Neurosurgery (M.F.), Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan michio1974111@gmail.com. 2. Clinica Sagrada Familia (M.F., I.L., C.B., J.C., P.L.), ENERI, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3. Department of Neurosurgery (P.A.), Hospital Barros Luco Trudeau, University of Santiago, Santiago, Chile.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms using endovascular therapy is still challenging even with the development of treatment devices. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with a Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients treated with a WEB device at our institution between May 2009 and November 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical and imaging evaluation, aneurysm occlusion status, and modified Rankin scale score were analyzed 1 day after treatment and in the short- (<6 months), mid- (<24 months), and long-term (>24 months) follow-up periods. RESULTS: Forty-one cases of wide-neck aneurysms were analyzed in this study. Overall, 78.8% of the aneurysms had complete occlusion in the last follow-up, and 19.5% required retreatment with additional endovascular devices. A good clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale: 0-2) was obtained in 95.1% of the patients, and the overall treatment-related morbidity and mortality rates were 2.4% and 0.0%, respectively. The mean follow-up time was 15.3 ± 13.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in this study suggest that treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms with a WEB device is feasible with an acceptable safety and efficacy rate.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms using endovascular therapy is still challenging even with the development of treatment devices. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with a Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients treated with a WEB device at our institution between May 2009 and November 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical and imaging evaluation, aneurysm occlusion status, and modified Rankin scale score were analyzed 1 day after treatment and in the short- (<6 months), mid- (<24 months), and long-term (>24 months) follow-up periods. RESULTS: Forty-one cases of wide-neck aneurysms were analyzed in this study. Overall, 78.8% of the aneurysms had complete occlusion in the last follow-up, and 19.5% required retreatment with additional endovascular devices. A good clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale: 0-2) was obtained in 95.1% of the patients, and the overall treatment-related morbidity and mortality rates were 2.4% and 0.0%, respectively. The mean follow-up time was 15.3 ± 13.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in this study suggest that treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms with a WEB device is feasible with an acceptable safety and efficacy rate.
Authors: C Papagiannaki; L Spelle; A-C Januel; A Benaissa; J-Y Gauvrit; V Costalat; H Desal; F Turjman; S Velasco; X Barreau; P Courtheoux; C Cognard; D Herbreteau; J Moret; L Pierot Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: D Herbreteau; R Bibi; A P Narata; K Janot; C Papagiannaki; S Soize; L Pierot Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: L Pierot; J Moret; F Turjman; D Herbreteau; H Raoult; X Barreau; S Velasco; H Desal; A-C Januel; P Courtheoux; J-Y Gauvrit; C Cognard; S Soize; A Molyneux; L Spelle Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Laurent Pierot; Vincent Costalat; Jacques Moret; Istvan Szikora; Joachim Klisch; Denis Herbreteau; Markus Holtmannspötter; Werner Weber; Anne-Christine Januel; Thomas Liebig; Vojtech Sychra; Christoph Strasilla; Christophe Cognard; Alain Bonafé; Andrew Molyneux; James V Byrne; Laurent Spelle Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: S B T van Rooij; W J van Rooij; J P Peluso; M Sluzewski; R S Bechan; H G Kortman; G N Beute; B van der Pol; C B Majoie Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: X Armoiry; F Turjman; D J Hartmann; R Sivan-Hoffmann; R Riva; P E Labeyrie; G Aulagner; B Gory Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Fadi Al Saiegh; Lohit Velagapudi; Omaditya Khanna; Ahmad Sweid; Nikolaos Mouchtouris; Michael P Baldassari; Thana Theofanis; Rizwan Tahir; Victoria Schunemann; Carrie Andrews; Lucas Philipp; Nohra Chalouhi; Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris; David Hasan; M Reid Gooch; Nabeel A Herial; Robert H Rosenwasser; Pascal Jabbour Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2021-09-04 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Visish M Srinivasan; Adam A Dmytriw; Robert W Regenhardt; Juan Vicenty-Padilla; Naif M Alotaibi; Elad Levy; Muhammad Waqas; Jacob Cherian; Jeremiah N Johnson; Pascal Jabbour; Ahmad Sweid; Bradley Gross; Robert M Starke; Ajit Puri; Francesco Massari; Christoph J Griessenauer; Joshua S Catapano; Caleb Rutledge; Omar Tanweer; Parham Yashar; Gustavo M Cortez; Mohammad A Aziz-Sultan; Aman B Patel; Andrew F Ducruet; Felipe C Albuquerque; Ricardo A Hanel; Michael T Lawton; Peter Kan Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tom De Beule; Thierry Boulanger; Sam Heye; Williem J van Rooij; Wim van Zwam; Luc Stockx Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2021-03-21 Impact factor: 1.764
Authors: J Cortese; J Caroff; J-B Girot; C Mihalea; V Da Ros; G Aguiar; A Elawady; L Ikka; S Gallas; A Ozanne; V Chalumeau; A Rouchaud; J Moret; L Spelle Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 4.966
Authors: Timothy G White; Kevin Shah; Justin Turpin; Thomas Link; Amir R Dehdashti; Jeffrey M Katz; Henry H Woo Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2020-11-29 Impact factor: 1.764