Farshid Alizadeh1, Seyed Morteza Heydari2, Reza Nejadgashti3. 1. Kidney Transplantation Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Department of Urology, Isfahan, Iran. Electronic address: f_alizadeh@med.mui.ac.ir. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. 3. Kidney Transplantation Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Department of Urology, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Intraoperative blood loss is considered to be an important issue in hypospadias surgery. Some studies have demonstrated the utility of caudal epidural block (CEB) in this regard among pediatric patients with hypospadias. Though there is evidence in favor of the use of CEB as the only anesthetic method for pediatric surgeries, it is usually used in combination with general anesthesia. In this form of use, it could have more favorable outcomes for both intra- and postoperative periods. There are few studies regarding the effectiveness of CEB on intraoperative blood loss. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the utility of CEB on blood loss, operation time, and analgesic use during hypospadias repairs of pediatric population referred to our university hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized clinical trial, consecutive patients with hypospadias who were candidate for surgery were enrolled and randomly allocated to one of the two groups: group A received caudal epidural block (CEB) plus general anesthesia (GA) before surgery and group B received only GA. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and dose of fentanyl used during the procedure were recorded and compared. All surgeries were performed by a single pediatric urologist in two different university hospitals that was not blinded to the study groups. RESULTS: In this study, 57 pediatric patients with hypospadias who underwent surgical repair were studied, from which 29 and 28 patients were allocated to receive or not to receive preoperative CEB, respectively. The patients' age, weight, ASA, score and severity of hypospadias were not significantly different between the two groups. The operation time was significantly lower in the CEB before surgery group (p < 0.05). The mean dose of fentanyl and volume of blood loss during procedure were lower in the CEB group, although for fentanyl it approached but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The findings of current study indicated that caudal epidural anesthesia in addition to general anesthesia has a favorable effect on reducing blood loss during operation, operation time, and analgesic use. Our data confirm the findings of previous studies in this field. Further studies are recommended to evaluate the effect of this type of analgesia in other outcomes of hypospadias repair surgery. Our results could be used for revising existing surgical guidelines for better management of hypospadias.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Intraoperative blood loss is considered to be an important issue in hypospadias surgery. Some studies have demonstrated the utility of caudal epidural block (CEB) in this regard among pediatric patients with hypospadias. Though there is evidence in favor of the use of CEB as the only anesthetic method for pediatric surgeries, it is usually used in combination with general anesthesia. In this form of use, it could have more favorable outcomes for both intra- and postoperative periods. There are few studies regarding the effectiveness of CEB on intraoperative blood loss. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the utility of CEB on blood loss, operation time, and analgesic use during hypospadias repairs of pediatric population referred to our university hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized clinical trial, consecutive patients with hypospadias who were candidate for surgery were enrolled and randomly allocated to one of the two groups: group A received caudal epidural block (CEB) plus general anesthesia (GA) before surgery and group B received only GA. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and dose of fentanyl used during the procedure were recorded and compared. All surgeries were performed by a single pediatric urologist in two different university hospitals that was not blinded to the study groups. RESULTS: In this study, 57 pediatric patients with hypospadias who underwent surgical repair were studied, from which 29 and 28 patients were allocated to receive or not to receive preoperative CEB, respectively. The patients' age, weight, ASA, score and severity of hypospadias were not significantly different between the two groups. The operation time was significantly lower in the CEB before surgery group (p < 0.05). The mean dose of fentanyl and volume of blood loss during procedure were lower in the CEB group, although for fentanyl it approached but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The findings of current study indicated that caudal epidural anesthesia in addition to general anesthesia has a favorable effect on reducing blood loss during operation, operation time, and analgesic use. Our data confirm the findings of previous studies in this field. Further studies are recommended to evaluate the effect of this type of analgesia in other outcomes of hypospadias repair surgery. Our results could be used for revising existing surgical guidelines for better management of hypospadias.