| Literature DB >> 34159089 |
Jingqi Zhang1, Shibo Zhu1, Liyu Zhang1, Wen Fu1, Jinhua Hu1, Zhao Zhang1, Wei Jia1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of caudal block (CB) on the incidence of urethroplasty complications in hypospadias repair remains controversial. The evidence is conflicting, and some confounding bias issues need to be addressed. We sought to study a more homogenous group of distal hypospadias patients undergoing primary tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair by a senior pediatric urology surgeon in the past 2 years to examine the relationship between urethroplasty complications and the use of CB.Entities:
Keywords: Hypospadias; caudal block; fistulas; tubularized incised plate repair (TIP repair)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34159089 PMCID: PMC8185679 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Androl Urol ISSN: 2223-4683
Patients’ demographic data between the different anesthesia groups
| Variables | Total, N=246 | General only, N=116 (47.15%) | General + CB, N=130 (52.85%) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at surgery (years) | 0.56 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 2.61 (2.15) | 2.56 (4.8) | 2.65 (2.11) | |
| Median (interquartile range) | 2 [2] | 2 [2] | 2 [2] | |
| Age group, n (%) | 0.38 | |||
| <2 years | 98 (39.84) | 51 (43.97) | 47 (36.15) | |
| 2 to 4 (not inclusive) | 95 (38.62) | 40 (34.48) | 55 (42.31) | |
| ≥4 | 53 (21.54) | 25 (21.55) | 28 (21.54) | |
| Weight (kilograms) | 0.45 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 13.32 (4.75) | 13.30 (5.48) | 13.35 (4.23) | |
| Median (interquartile range) | 12 [4] | 12 (4.28) | 12 (18.10) | |
| Length of urethral plate defect (cm) | 0.43 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 2.08 (0.74) | 2.10 (0.68) | 2.07 (0.79) | |
| Median (interquartile range) | 2 (0.8) | 2 (0.5) | 2 (0.7) | |
| Glans size (cm) | 0.73 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 1.35 (0.21) | 1.35 (0.23) | 1.34 (0.20) | |
| Median (interquartile range) | 1.4 (0.3) | 1.4 (0.28) | 1.4 (0.3) |
CB, caudal block.
Univariate and multivariable analysis of risk factors for urethroplasty complications in distal TIP repair patients
| Factors | No complications, N=216 | Complications, N=30 | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P value | RR (95% CI) | P value | ||||
| Analgesia, n (%) | 0.25 | |||||
| General only | 99 (85.3) | 17 (14.7) | 0.27 | 1.58 (0.73–3.45) | ||
| General + CB | 117 (90.0) | 13 (10.0) | ||||
| Age in years (SD) | 2.52 (2.15) | 3.27 (2.08) | 0.01 | 1.18 (1.00–1.38) | 0.04 | |
| Age group, n (%) | 0.02 | |||||
| <2 years | 91 (92.9) | 7 (7.1) | ||||
| 2 to 4 (not inclusive) | 84 (88.4) | 11 (11.6) | ||||
| ≥4 | 41 (77.4) | 12 (22.6) | ||||
| Weight (SD) | 13.09 (4.47) | 15.02 (6.28) | 0.218 | |||
| Length of urethral plate defect (SD) | 2.06 (0.72) | 2.25 (0.84) | 0.16 | 1.40 (0.85–2.30) | 0.19 | |
| Glans size (SD) | 1.34 (4.47) | 1.36 (0.24) | 0.44 | 0.65 (0.09–4.69) | 0.67 | |
TIP, tubularized incised plate; CB, caudal block, HR, hazard ratio.