BACKGROUND: to determine reliability and reproducibility of measurements of aortic annulus in 3D models printed from cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) images. METHODS: Retrospective study on the records of 20 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with pre-surgery annulus assessment by CCT and intra-operative sizing by Hegar dilators (IOS). 3D models were fabricated by fused deposition modelling of thermoplastic polyurethane filaments. For each patient, two 3D models were independently segmented, modelled and printed by two blinded "manufacturers": a radiologist and a radiology technician. Two blinded cardiac surgeons performed the annulus diameter measurements by Hegar dilators on the two sets of models. Matched data from different measurements were analyzed with Wilcoxon test, Bland-Altmann plot and within-subject ANOVA. RESULTS: No significant differences were found among the measurements made by each cardiac surgeon on the same 3D model (p = 0.48) or on the 3D models printed by different manufacturers (p = 0.25); also, no intraobserver variability (p = 0.46). The annulus diameter measured on 3D models showed good agreement with the reference CCT measurement (p = 0.68) and IOH sizing (p = 0.11). Time and cost per model were: model creation ∼10-15 min; printing time ∼60 min; post-processing ∼5min; material cost ∼1€. CONCLUSION: 3D printing of aortic annulus can offer reliable, not expensive patient-specific information to be used in the pre-operative planning of AVR or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
BACKGROUND: to determine reliability and reproducibility of measurements of aortic annulus in 3D models printed from cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) images. METHODS: Retrospective study on the records of 20 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with pre-surgery annulus assessment by CCT and intra-operative sizing by Hegar dilators (IOS). 3D models were fabricated by fused deposition modelling of thermoplastic polyurethane filaments. For each patient, two 3D models were independently segmented, modelled and printed by two blinded "manufacturers": a radiologist and a radiology technician. Two blinded cardiac surgeons performed the annulus diameter measurements by Hegar dilators on the two sets of models. Matched data from different measurements were analyzed with Wilcoxon test, Bland-Altmann plot and within-subject ANOVA. RESULTS: No significant differences were found among the measurements made by each cardiac surgeon on the same 3D model (p = 0.48) or on the 3D models printed by different manufacturers (p = 0.25); also, no intraobserver variability (p = 0.46). The annulus diameter measured on 3D models showed good agreement with the reference CCT measurement (p = 0.68) and IOH sizing (p = 0.11). Time and cost per model were: model creation ∼10-15 min; printing time ∼60 min; post-processing ∼5min; material cost ∼1€. CONCLUSION: 3D printing of aortic annulus can offer reliable, not expensive patient-specific information to be used in the pre-operative planning of AVR or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
Authors: Federico E Mordini; Conor F Hynes; Richard L Amdur; Jeffrey Panting; Dominic A Emerson; Jason Morrissette; Erin Goheen-Thomas; Michael D Greenberg; Gregory D Trachiotis Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Dmitry Levin; G Burkhard Mackensen; Mark Reisman; James M McCabe; Danny Dvir; Beth Ripley Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 2.931