Patterns of Orthostatic Blood Pressure Changes in Patients with Orthostatic Hypotension.

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the patterns of blood pressure (BP) changes during the head-up tilt (HUT) test, particularly in terms of its clinical significance for patients with orthostatic hypotension (OH).
METHODS: OH was divided into four categories based on systolic BP changes occurring within the first 10 minutes of the HUT test: sustained orthostatic hypotension (SOH), progressive orthostatic hypotension (POH), orthostatic hypotension with partial recovery (OHPR), and transient orthostatic hypotension (TOH).
RESULTS: In total, 151 patients were analyzed: 65 with SOH, 38 with POH, 21 with OHPR, and 27 with TOH. POH patients exhibited the greatest reduction in systolic BP after HUT and were also the most likely to develop symptoms requiring early termination of the HUT test (42.1%, p<0.001). Additionally, SOH patients exhibited smaller heart-rate variation with deep breathing values (p=0.003) and Valsalva ratios (p=0.022) compared to POH patients. The sweat volume was greatest in OHPR patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics, including the findings of autonomic function tests, differed between the OH patient groups. This might reflect differences in the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Determining the patterns of BP changes during the HUT test may facilitate the development of effective management strategies in patients with OH.

INTRODUCTION

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a common condition that occurs when a patient shows a reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP) of at least 20 mm Hg or in diastolic BP of at least 10 mm Hg within 3 minutes of standing or after a head-up tilt (HUT) to at least 60 degrees on a tilt table.12345 The severity of OH symptoms can vary substantially between patients, with some patients failing to display even minor symptoms during the HUT test in spite of showing the characteristic BP decrease.6 Unfortunately, it is difficult to predict either the presence or the severity of clinical symptoms for any specific patient.

OH is known to be caused by adrenergic sympathetic dysfunction.567 Although OH is defined solely based on a minimum threshold for a change in BP, the magnitude of BP decreases and the patterns of BP changes during the HUT test are highly variable. Some patients show rapid recovery in BP after tilting while others show a continuous decrease over time for as long as the tilted position is maintained. These variations could be related to the ability of the autonomic nervous system to compensate for changes in BP. Two previous studies have measured the patterns of BP changes in different OH patients.89 However, both of these studies mainly focused on supine hypertension with OH9 or otherwise were limited to the minimum duration of HUT necessary to detect OH,8 without focusing on the clinical significance of these patterns of BP changes. Additionally, the authors applied a HUT protocol that involved only 5 minutes of tilting, which might be insufficient to observe meaningful patterns in BP changes. Finally, their samples were likely to be too small to allow any significant clinical conclusions to be drawn. A recent study also investigated the patterns of BP changes in OH patients, but it targeted all types of OH including delayed OH; that is, not just classic OH alone.10 This approach meant that the study could not provide information on the detailed pattern classification of classic OH, which constitutes the largest proportion of all types of OH.

The aim of the present study was to identify the association between the patterns of BP changes during the HUT test and symptom development during tilting, as well as to obtain other autonomic function test (AFT) results for OH patients.

METHODS

Subjects

Among 3,152 patients with orthostatic intolerance, we reviewed the medical records of 336 patients with OH, whose diagnosis was confirmed by a HUT test at a university-affiliated neurology clinic between August 2010 and June 2015. OH was diagnosed as a systolic BP reduction of at least 20 mm Hg within 3 minutes of tilting in the HUT test. Based on the HUT results, we defined neurogenic OH as being present when patients exhibiting OH also had an increase in heart rate of <15 beats/minute within 3 minutes of tilting.11 Patients with delayed OH who met the criterion of a BP decrease after 3 minutes of beginning tilting and for whom OH was diagnosed based only a decrease in diastolic BP were excluded from further analyses. We also excluded patients with fluctuating systolic BP changes due to the possibility of technical errors and ambiguous classification of OH.

Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, and comorbid medical conditions were obtained by reviewing medical records. Additionally, other available AFT results such as for the quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART), heart-rate variation with deep breathing (HRDB), and Valsalva ratio were obtained.

The following types of OH were defined according to systolic-BP-vs.-time curves during the initial 10 minutes of tilting: sustained orthostatic hypotension (SOH), progressive orthostatic hypotension (POH), orthostatic hypotension with partial recovery (OHPR), and transient orthostatic hypotension (TOH) (Fig. 1). SOH is defined as a relatively stable systolic BP without a decrease or a recovery of ≥10 mm Hg after decreasing ≥20 mm Hg within 3 minutes of tilting. POH is defined either by a continuous decrease of ≥10 mm Hg in BP extending beyond 3 minutes of tilting or by a stable BP without a decrease or a recovery of ≥10 mm Hg during the initial 5 minutes, followed by a decrease of ≥15 mm Hg between 5 and 10 minutes of tilting. OHPR is defined either by an incomplete recovery of ≥10 mm Hg in BP (remaining ≥20 mm Hg below baseline; in other words, continuing OH) within 5 minutes of tilting, or by a stable BP without decrease or a recovery of ≥10 mm Hg during the initial 5 minutes, followed by a recovery by ≥15 mm Hg between 5 and 10 minutes of tilting. TOH is defined by a recovery of ≥10 mm Hg in BP to a level that no longer satisfies the definition of OH (i.e., within 20 mm Hg of baseline) within 5 minutes of tilting.

Fig. 1

Patterns of changes in systolic BP. Upper line is a schematic representation and lower line shows data from an example patient with orthostatic hypotension. SOH is defined as occurring when a patient has a relatively stable systolic BP after it has decreased within 3 minutes of tilting. POH is defined by a continuous decrease in BP extending beyond 3 minutes of tilting. OHPR is defined by an incomplete recovery in BP (remaining ≥20 mm Hg below baseline) within 5 minutes of tilting. TOH is defined by a recovery in BP to a level that no longer satisfies the definition of OH (i.e., within 20 mm Hg of baseline). BP: blood pressure, OHPR: orthostatic hypotension with partial recovery, POH: progressive orthostatic hypotension, SOH: sustained orthostatic hypotension, TOH: transient orthostatic hypotension.

Ethics statement

All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Korea University Medical Center Institutional Review Board with exemption of the requirement to obtain informed consent (IRB no. ED15255).

HUT test

The HUT test was applied to all of the subjects. Patients were asked to not consume any medication, alcohol, or coffee that could affect autonomic function for at least 24 hours prior to the test. Orthostatic BP was measured using a sphygmomanometer cuff over the brachial artery and a monitor console that displays the systolic, diastolic, and mean BPs. The patient's heart rate was recorded simultaneously with the BP. After 20 minutes of rest in the supine position, baseline resting measurements of BP and heart rate were performed. Each subject was then positioned at an angle of 70 degrees from the supine position on a standard electrically driven tilt table with footboard for at least 10 minutes. We measured the BP and heart rate once per minute during the HUT test.

Other AFTs

AFT results for subjects who completed the QSART and in whom the HRDB and Valsalva ratio were measured were also obtained, as described below.

QSART

The QSART was performed according to the standard method with the Q-Sweat device (WR Medical Electronics, Maplewood, MN, USA).71213 The stimulus involved applying 10% acetylcholine via iontophoresis at 2 mA for 5 minutes, which was followed by an additional 5 minutes of recording. Responses were recorded quantitatively from four sites: proximal forearm (25% of the distance from the ulnar epicondyle to the pisiform bone), distal forearm (75% of the distance from the ulnar epicondyle to the pisiform bone), proximal leg (5 cm distal to the fibular head), and distal leg (5 cm proximal to the medial malleolus). All of the obtained data were compared to age- and sex-specific reference values.14 A QSART result was considered abnormal if the sweat volume was lower than the age- and sex-specific reference value.

HRDB and Valsalva ratio

The HRDB and Valsalva ratio were measured using a conventional Nicolet Viking IV device (Nicolet Biomedical, Madison, WI, USA) according to a previously described method.71215 The heart-rate range in response to forced respiratory sinus arrhythmia was measured during deep breathing at 6 breaths/minute. The mean value of differences between the maximum and minimum heart rates during each cycle for six breaths was used in the analysis. For the Valsalva maneuver, the rested and recumbent subject was asked to maintain an airway pressure of 40 mm Hg for 15 seconds. The Valsalva ratio is calculated as the ratio of the maximum heart rate to the minimum heart rate. The obtained values were also compared with age-specific reference values.15

Statistical analysis

We compared variations in demographic characteristics, symptom development during HUT, and the results of the other AFTs across patients with variations in the patterns of BP changes during the HUT test. We also examined intergroup differences in the frequency with which the HUT test was terminated early (prior to 10 minutes) due to symptomatic hypotension. The change in systolic BP was defined as the difference between the baseline and lowest systolic BP point reached after tilting. We also examined the variation in the frequency of abnormal AFT results.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square methods were used for statistical analysis. Post-hoc analysis of significant differences between groups was performed using Tukey's honest-significant-difference test. Probability values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

Few clinical characteristics are associated with the patterns of BP changes in OH patients

Among the 336 patients with OH, 90 had delayed OH and 17 were diagnosed only according to a decrease in diastolic BP and were excluded from our analyses. Another 78 patients had a fluctuating systolic BP (Fig. 2) and so were also excluded. Therefore, 151 patients (102 men; age 70.1±12.7 years, mean±SD) were included in the final analysis: 65 with SOH (43.0%), 38 with POH (25.2%), 21 with OHPR group (13.9%), and 27 with TOH (17.9%). Neurogenic OH was identified in 56 (86.2%), 29 (76.3%), 15 (71.4%), and 22 (81.5%) of those with SOH, POH, OHPR, and TOH, respectively. The proportion with neurogenic OH and the demographic data and comorbid diseases did not significantly differ between the groups (Table 1).

Fig. 2

An example of fluctuating systolic BP. Patients with fluctuating systolic BP that did not conform to any of the four patterns were excluded from the analysis. BP: blood pressure.

Table 1

Clinical characteristics according to categorization of OH

Characteristics	SOH (n=65)	POH (n=38)	OHPR (n=21)	TOH (n=27)	p
Age (years)	70.6±10.9	66.6±17.1	70.2±13.0	73.8±8.0	0.150
Sex (male)	44 (67.7)	23 (60.5)	18 (85.7)	17 (63.0)	0.233
Neurogenic OH	56 (86.2)	29 (76.3)	15 (71.4)	22 (81.5)	0.409
Comorbid diseases
Diabetes	21 (32.3)	9 (23.7)	10 (47.6)	10 (37.0)	0.292
Hypertension	35 (53.8)	21 (55.3)	12 (57.1)	19 (70.4)	0.519
Parkinson's disease	16 (24.6)	5 (13.2)	4 (19.0)	5 (18.5)	0.565
Multiple system atrophy	10 (15.4)	6 (15.8)	1 (4.8)	1 (3.7)	0.257
Cerebrovascular disease	17 (26.2)	8 (21.1)	7 (33.3)	12 (44.4)	0.193

Data are n (%) or mean±SD values.

OH: orthostatic hypotension, OHPR: orthostatic hypotension with partial recovery, POH: progressive orthostatic hypotension, SOH: sustained orthostatic hypotension, TOH: transient orthostatic hypotension.

Significant intergroup variations in HUT test results

POH patients had the largest supine-to-tilt systolic BP reduction (56.6±21.7 mm Hg, p<0.001) and the highest proportion (42.1%, 16/38) with the early termination of tilting and symptom development (both p<0.001). The change in supine-to-tilt systolic BP was greater in patients with SOH (44.3±13.5 mm Hg) and OHPR (43.7±12.0 mm Hg) than in TOH patients (26.2±5.1 mm Hg), but the rate of symptom development did not differ between the groups (Table 2).

Table 2

Detailed results for the HUT across orthostatic hypotension categories

HUT test results	SOH (n=65)	POH (n=38)	OHPR (n=21)	TOH (n=27)	p
Early tilting termination	8 (12.3)	16 (42.1)	2 (9.5)	2 (7.4)	<0.001
Symptom on tilting	8 (12.3)	16 (42.1)	2 (9.5)	3 (11.1)	0.001
Systolic BP (mm Hg)
Baseline	138.9±21.1	137.7±23.7	136.9±16.1	130.3±21.1	0.357
Lowest BP during HUT	94.6±20.3a	81.1±19.6a,b	93.2±18.3	104.1±22.1b	<0.001
Change in systolic BP	44.3±13.5a,c	56.6±21.7a,b,c	43.7±12.0b,c	26.2±5.1c	<0.001

Data are n (%) or mean±SD values. Means with the same letter differed significantly in Tukey's honest-significant-difference test.

BP: blood pressure, HUT: head-up tilt, OHPR: orthostatic hypotension with partial recovery, POH: progressive orthostatic hypotension, SOH: sustained orthostatic hypotension, TOH: transient orthostatic hypotension.

Other AFTs showed significant differences across OH groups

Complete data on other AFTs were available in 64 of the 151 patients. The remaining 87 patients included those for whom all other AFTs were not performed (n=38) and those for whom only some tests were carried out (e.g., HRDB and Valsalva ratio without QSART, n=49). Thus, only data for 64 patients were analyzed (Table 3).

Table 3

Results of other autonomic function tests across orthostatic hypotension categories

AFT results	SOH (n=25)	POH (n=21)	OHPR (n=10)	TOH (n=8)	p
HRDB (beats/minute)	7.2±4.7a	13.4±8.7a,b	6.5±3.7b	12.9±5.1	0.003
HRDB abnormality	13 (52.0)	7 (33.3)	6 (60.0)	2 (25.0)	0.280
Valsalva ratio	1.2±0.2a	1.5±0.3a	1.3±0.2	1.4±0.2	0.022
Valsalva ratio abnormality	20 (80.0)	8 (38.1)	7 (70.0)	3 (37.5)	0.015
QSART (µL)
Proximal forearm	0.4±0.4a	0.6±0.4b	1.1±0.7a,b	0.6±0.4	0.005
Distal forearm	0.8±0.5	1.1±0.8	1.3±0.6	1.3±1.0	0.346
Proximal leg	0.5±0.6a	0.6±0.5b	1.3±1.0a,b,c	0.5±0.4c	0.004
Distal leg	0.4±0.6	0.8±1.0	1.1±0.7	0.6±0.7	0.207
QSART abnormality	18 (72.0)	8 (38.1)	4 (40.0)	5 (62.5)	0.093

Data are n (%) or mean±SD values. Means with the same letter differed significantly in Tukey's honest-significant-difference test.

AFT: autonomic function test, HRDB: heart-rate variation with deep breathing, OHPR: orthostatic hypotension with partial recovery, POH: progressive orthostatic hypotension, QSART: quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test, SOH: sustained orthostatic hypotension, TOH: transient orthostatic hypotension.

There were significant intergroup differences in both the HRDB and Valsalva ratio (p=0.003 and 0.022, respectively). A post-hoc analysis demonstrated that patients with SOH had a smaller HRDB value (7.2±4.7 beats/minute) and Valsalva ratio (1.2±0.2) compared to POH patients (p=0.008 and 0.015, respectively). Patients with OHPR also had a smaller HRDB value (6.5±3.7 beats/minute) than POH patients (p=0.030). In a subanalysis of the QSART based on recording site, the sweat volume of the proximal forearm was greater in OHPR patients (1.1±0.7 µL) than in SOH (p=0.003) and POH (p=0.022) patients. In addition, OHPR patients had a greater sweat volume of the proximal leg (1.3±1.0 µL) than all other groups (p=0.003, 0.012, and 0.030 compared to SOH, POH, and TOH patients, respectively). The proportion of patients with an abnormal Valsalva ratio (p=0.015) differed among the groups, whereas there were no significant differences in the proportions of those with abnormal HRDB and QSART results.

DISCUSSION

This study explored the patterns of BP changes during the HUT test and its clinical significance in OH patients. Based on the first 10 minutes after HUT, we identified four patterns of BP changes among OH patients, which we termed SOH, POH, OHPR, and TOH (as defined in the Methods section). Key measurements from the HUT test and other AFTs were found to differ significantly between these four OH groups. POH patients exhibited both the largest decrease in systolic BP after tilting and the greatest likelihood of developing symptoms resulting in early HUT termination. Additionally, patients with SOH had smaller HRDB values and Valsalva ratios compared to POH patients, and OHPR patients had greater proximal forearm and leg sweat volumes.

We observed that SOH (43.0%) was the most common pattern among the OH patients in our study, followed by POH (25.2%), TOH (17.9%), and OHPR (13.9%). To our knowledge there are two other published studies that have also evaluated OH patterns.89 One study found five patterns of orthostatic BP response, which were described as stable OH, OH with partial recovery, OH with late recovery, POH, and OH with delayed worsening. That study investigated 66 patients with OH, and most of the patients were assigned to groups with either stable OH (48%) or POH (36%),8 which respectively correspond to our SOH and POH groups. OH with partial recovery in the previous study was similar to SOH in our study, but those authors did not consider the transient pattern. The second study found three distinct OH patterns, which were described as SOH, POH, and TOH.9 Most of the included 70 patients (55.7%) were categorized as SOH, which is in line with our results. However, unlike in the present study, TOH was more frequent (27.1%) than POH (17.1%). The inconsistencies between our study and each of the other two studies may be due to the application of slightly different definitions for OH patterns, as well as differences in the duration of the tilting time during HUT. We defined a new pattern, called OHPR, which exhibited a slight but incomplete recovery after the initial BP decrease. Perhaps more importantly, whereas these previous studies focused on the initial 5 minutes of tilting, we considered systolic BP changes up to 10 minutes after beginning the head tilt as part of our classification system. Because of these differences, patients in our OHPR category might have been categorized as TOH when applying a HUT test that only considered the period up to 5 minutes after tilting the head.

The patterns of BP changes for different OH patients can provide information for predicting the HUT outcome.89 Similar to previous studies,89 our patients with POH showed the highest proportion of cases (42.1%, 16/38) of early termination of tilting and symptom development during the HUT test. In addition, the POH patients exhibited the greatest decrease in systolic BP during tilting, suggesting a greater impairment of adrenergic sympathetic function. In support of this notion, two previous studies using the Valsalva maneuver demonstrated that higher adrenergic scores in the composite autonomic severity score occurred in OH patients with a progressive pattern.89 These dramatic adrenergic deficits imply the presence of severe impairment of the compensatory reflex in those patients, and that this contributes to their poorer HUT outcomes.

Conversely, even though the supine-to-tilt systolic BP changes were greater in patients with SOH or OHPR than in TOH patients, the rate of symptom development did not differ between these groups. A recent study using Model-flow measurements of total peripheral resistance and cardiac output classified OH into three categories: 1) arteriolar OH, characterized by a predominant decrease in total peripheral resistance, 2) venular OH, characterized by a predominant decrease in cardiac output, and 3) mixed OH, characterized by decreases in both of these parameters.16 On the one hand, patients with mixed OH showed the greatest posttilt reduction in systolic BP (median 53.3 mm Hg, range 45.59–66.76 mm Hg), and symptoms developed in 46% of these patients. On the other hand, the decrease in systolic BP was smaller in patients with venular OH (median 31.9 mm Hg, range 28.12–40.78 mm Hg) than in patients with arteriolar OH (median 42.5 mm Hg, range 30.65–46.93 mm Hg) and mixed OH, and yet the proportion of patients reporting symptoms was higher or similar in venular OH (47%) than in arteriolar (33%) and mixed (46%) OH. Together these findings suggest that, in addition to the magnitude of the BP decrease, other factors are involved in the development of symptoms experienced by OH patients during the HUT test. A different main determinant for the decrease in BP in each OH category could affect symptom occurrence. One previous study found that the main determinant of the BP decrease leading to symptoms was a significant reduction in cardiac output due to reduced venous return.16 Those authors also found that the reduction in cardiac output was significantly greater in symptomatic OH patients.

In our study we found that patients with SOH had smaller HRDB values and Valsalva ratios compared to POH patients, suggesting a significant decrease in cardiovagal activity. A previous study found that the adrenergic score of the composite autonomic severity score tended to be higher in patients with POH than in patients with SOH.8 However, there was no significant difference in cardiovagal, sudomotor, or total scores on the composite autonomic severity score between these two OH groups. In another study, patients with POH also had higher scores on the adrenergic subscale of the composite autonomic severity score compared to patients presenting other OH patterns.9 However, those authors did not report the cardiovagal, sudomotor, or total scores on the composite autonomic severity score for each OH pattern. Therefore, the presence of greater adrenergic dysfunction in POH than in SOH has been confirmed in previous studies and is consistent with our study. However, the differences of cardiovagal and sudomotor functions between POH and SOH are still difficult to determine based on previous results.

Our study is meaningful in showing that cardiovagal dysfunction might be greater in SOH than in POH. In addition, reduced heart-rate variability has been shown to be associated with increased risks of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thus, the SOH pattern may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Meanwhile, patients with OHPR exhibited the highest proximal forearm and leg sweat volumes. Our QSART findings show that the increased sweat volume indicates a relatively preserved cholinergic sympathetic function for OHPR patients. The parameters measured in OHPR patients for both the HUT and other AFTs are similar to those measured in SOH patients, with the exception of the QSART findings. This suggests that OHPR is a mild form of SOH in which cholinergic sympathetic function is preserved. Our findings therefore suggest that the severity and type of autonomic system dysfunction can be predicted by analyzing the patterns of BP changes during the HUT test in patients with OH. In other words, the different types of OH might be related to the different mechanisms that underlie autonomic dysfunction.

Prior studies have classified OH patterns based on HUT results obtained only during the initial 5 minutes of the test.89 However, we found that 5 minutes of orthostatic stress may be inadequate for defining the most meaningful patterns of BP changes. A significant proportion of the cases in our study (32%, 26/81) exhibited SOH patterns during the first 5 minutes, but then their BP changed significantly over the following 5 minutes. Of the 26 patients in our study allocated to the SOH group, 16 were redesignated as POH and 9 were redesignated as OHPR. In addition, 78 patients excluded from our final analysis based on fluctuating BP changes over 10 minutes would have been classifiable under the 5-minute criterion. Based on these findings, we suggest that a 5-minute HUT test does not yield sufficient data for characterizing the elaborate patterns of OH, even if 5 minutes is sufficient for diagnosing OH. Therefore, the orthostatic stress beyond 5 minutes should be measured when assessing clinically relevant patterns of BP changes among OH patients.

There are some potential limitations to our study that should be considered. Our data contained insufficient clinical information regarding medications that can potentially affect autonomic function due to the retrospective study design. To minimize the possible effects of medications, all subjects discontinued taking drugs for at least 24 hours prior to performing AFTs. Furthermore, our study included patients with various comorbid conditions that can contribute to OH. Although these comorbid conditions did not differ among the four OH groups in the present study, we could not exclude a possible influence of each OH pattern on the AFT results. However, we analyzed a relatively large amount of data compared to previous studies, and so this study improves the likelihood that such information could be applied in clinical evaluations of patients with OH. The analysis of other AFT results in OH patterns was also limited by the amount of missing data, which reduced the effective total sample size for this analysis to only 64 patients.

We performed manual BP measurements every minute rather than continuously monitoring the beat-to-beat BP. This use of intermittent BP monitoring can make differentiating the patterns of BP changes during a HUT artificial and unclear. In addition, we might have missed brief OH episodes such as initial OH, which constituted 30% of the total number of OH cases in a previous study that employed continuous BP monitoring.10 However, continuous noninvasive beat-to-beat BP monitoring performed using a finger plethysmographic device (e.g., Finapres) also has some limitations. The Finapres device reconstructs the brachial artery pressure from the measured finger arterial pressure using generalized waveform filtering and level correction. The arterial pressure waveform normally changes gradually from the brachial artery to the finger arteries as a result of the narrowing of the arteries, which can affect the accuracy of assessments of the arterial pressure. This physiologic phenomenon causes differences between the brachial and finger artery BPs. Furthermore, when peripheral vasoconstriction or poor vascular circulation is present, the BP measured in a finger is not necessarily representative of the brachial BP. There is a recent report of artificial drift in the plethysmographic finger BP being misinterpreted as OH.17 In particular, those authors showed that an artificial transient decrease in the plethysmographic finger BP could occur at the beginning of tilting. This can be fatal to evaluate the initial OH that occurs within 15 seconds of standing.2 Furthermore, passive tilting is not adequate for evaluating the initial OH; the condition can only be documented by employing active standing with continuous BP monitoring.218 While the lack of continuous BP monitoring using the Finapres device is a limitation of our study, this device is not always available for use in actual clinical practice. The Finapres device is not essential for performing the HUT test, and so our methods for the pattern analysis of OH using manual sphygmomanometer BP recordings can be more useful to clinicians in actual clinical practice.

Finally, caution should be applied when interpreting Valsalva ratio results as cardiovagal dysfunction when there is no information on simultaneous BP changes. However, in our study the Valsalva ratio decreased with the HRDB in SOH. The HRDB is a more sensitive and powerful test than the Valsalva ratio since both efferent and afferent pathways are vagal. Therefore, our results suggest that the cardiovagal dysfunction is greater in SOH than in POH regardless of the results for the Valsalva ratio.

These results show that not only is the HUT test useful for diagnosing OH, but also suggest the clinical significance of this test in differentiating the patterns of BP changes over a 10-minute test and associating those differences with the symptoms presented by those patients as well as their severity. OH patients present widely varying patterns of symptoms in HUT tests, and each pattern may have a different clinical significance. Therefore, our approach can provide additional valuable information for managing the disease in individual OH patients.

In conclusion, certain clinical measurements (including AFT results) show meaningful differences between different OH patient groups defined based on the patterns of systolic BP changes during head-up tilting in the HUT test. These differences might reflect different underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, and so different management strategies could be applied to specific OH patients in order to improve the likelihood of successful outcomes.