Literature DB >> 15834762

What is the minimum duration of head-up tilt necessary to detect orthostatic hypotension?

Jade A Gehrking1, Stacy M Hines, Lisa M Benrud-Larson, Tonette L Opher-Gehrking, Phillip A Low.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is uncertainty as to the minimum duration of head-up tilt (HUT) needed to detect orthostatic hypotension (OH). The orthostatic duration has variably been recommended to be 1, 2, 3, and 5 minutes. The purpose of the current study was 1) to determine the minimum duration of HUT necessary to detect OH and 2) to identify different patterns of orthostatic blood pressure (BP) response in patients with OH. DESIGN/
METHODS: We evaluated the medical records of 66 consecutive patients (mean age 70.0+/-10.1 years; 64% male) seen at Mayo Clinic-Rochester from 2000-2001 who fulfilled the criteria for OH (systolic blood pressure [SBP] reduction > or = 20 mmHg within 3 minutes of HUT) during routine clinical autonomic studies. All patients completed an autonomic reflex screen with continuous monitoring of heart rate and BP during supine rest and 5 minutes of 70 degree HUT. Severity of autonomic deficits was quantified with the Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS).
RESULTS: Overall, BP was the lowest at 1 minute with gradual and partial recovery over the following 4 minutes. Eighty-eight percent of patients (N=58) developed OH by 1 minute of HUT, with an additional 11% (N=7) developing OH by 2 minutes and the remaining 1% (N=1) developing OH by 3 minutes. We identified two broad patterns of SBP response to HUT. Forty-eight percent (N=32) of patients demonstrated an initial drop in SBP (> or = 20 mm Hg),which remained stable until tilt-back. Thirty-six percent (N=24) demonstrated an initial drop (> or = 20 mmHg) followed by a progressive decline in SBP until tilt-back. Repeated measures analysis of variance confirmed that the SBP change in response to HUT differed significantly among patients with a stable vs. progressive pattern [F(3,32)=25.1, p<0.001). Patients with the progressive pattern also had more severe adrenergic impairment on the CASS (p=0.03) and were more likely to have their tilt test terminated early (prior to 5 minutes) due to presyncope (p<0.0001) than patients with the stable pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: One minute of HUT will detect OH in the great majority (88%) of patients and three minutes will detect the balance. Orthostatic stress beyond 2 minutes is necessary to detect the pattern of progressive OH. Since this group has more severe adrenergic deficits than the group with stable OH, we suggest that the progressive pattern is due to greater impairment of compensatory reflexes. Recognition of the group with progressive fall in BP is important since this group may be at greater risk of orthostatic syncope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15834762     DOI: 10.1007/s10286-005-0246-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Auton Res        ISSN: 0959-9851            Impact factor:   4.435


  7 in total

Review 1.  Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, pure autonomic failure, and multiple system atrophy. The Consensus Committee of the American Autonomic Society and the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Neurally mediated syncope: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  H Kaufmann
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Pathophysiological basis of orthostatic hypotension in autonomic failure.

Authors:  A A Smit; J R Halliwill; P A Low; W Wieling
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Efficacy of midodrine vs placebo in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. A randomized, double-blind multicenter study. Midodrine Study Group.

Authors:  P A Low; J L Gilden; R Freeman; K N Sheng; M A McElligott
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Composite autonomic scoring scale for laboratory quantification of generalized autonomic failure.

Authors:  P A Low
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 6.  Consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy.

Authors:  S Gilman; P A Low; N Quinn; A Albanese; Y Ben-Shlomo; C J Fowler; H Kaufmann; T Klockgether; A E Lang; P L Lantos; I Litvan; C J Mathias; E Oliver; D Robertson; I Schatz; G K Wenning
Journal:  J Auton Nerv Syst       Date:  1998-12-11

Review 7.  Recent advances in the treatment of orthostatic hypotension.

Authors:  D Robertson; T L Davis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.910

  7 in total
  16 in total

Review 1.  Orthostatic hypotension: managing a difficult problem.

Authors:  Pearl K Jones; Brett H Shaw; Satish R Raj
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-10-01

2.  What is the optimal orthostatic stress to diagnose orthostatic hypotension?

Authors:  Satish R Raj
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.435

3.  Sub-Lingual Spray Versus Pearl of TNG as A Provocative Agent for Tilt Table Test.

Authors:  Reza Karbasi-Afshar; Amin Saburi; Ayat Shahmari; Arezoo Khosravi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-10-05

Review 4.  Confounders of vasovagal syncope: orthostatic hypotension.

Authors:  Victor C Nwazue; Satish R Raj
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 5.  Preventing and treating orthostatic hypotension: As easy as A, B, C.

Authors:  Juan J Figueroa; Jeffrey R Basford; Phillip A Low
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.321

Review 6.  Orthostatic Circulatory Disorders: From Nosology to Nuts and Bolts.

Authors:  Michael Gutkin; Julian M Stewart
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 7.  The relationship between orthostatic hypotension and falling in older adults.

Authors:  Brett H Shaw; Victoria E Claydon
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 8.  The patient with supine hypertension and orthostatic hypotension: a clinical dilemma.

Authors:  J E Naschitz; G Slobodin; N Elias; I Rosner
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 9.  Orthostatic hypotension: framework of the syndrome.

Authors:  Jochanan E Naschitz; Itzhak Rosner
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Unobtrusive Detection of Simulated Orthostatic Hypotension and Supine Hypertension Using Ballistocardiogram and Electrocardiogram of Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Isaac S Chang; Narges Armanfard; Abdul Q Javaid; Jennifer Boger; Alex Mihailidis
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.