Literature DB >> 29855060

On the propensity score weighting analysis with survival outcome: Estimands, estimation, and inference.

Huzhang Mao1,2, Liang Li2, Wei Yang3, Yu Shen2.   

Abstract

Propensity score analysis is widely used in observational studies to adjust for confounding and estimate the causal effect of a treatment on the outcome. When the outcome is survival time, there are special considerations on the definition of the causal estimand, point, and variance estimation that have not been thoroughly studied in the literature. We investigate propensity score analysis of survival data with a class of weighting methods. We consider the following estimands in the two-sample context: average survival time, restricted average survival time, survival probability, survival quantile, and the marginal hazard ratio. We propose a unified analytic framework to obtain the point and variance estimators. The proposed methodology properly adjusts for the sampling variability in the estimated propensity scores. Extensive simulations show that the point and variance estimators possess desired finite sample properties and demonstrate better numerical performance than some existing weighting and matching methods commonly used in the literature. The proposed methodology is illustrated with data from a breast cancer study.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  balancing weight; hazard ratio; matching weight; observational study; survival data

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29855060     DOI: 10.1002/sim.7839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Causal Inference for External Comparator Arm Studies.

Authors:  Gerd Rippin; Nicolás Ballarini; Héctor Sanz; Joan Largent; Chantal Quinten; Francesco Pignatti
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.228

2.  Flexible regression approach to propensity score analysis and its relationship with matching and weighting.

Authors:  Huzhang Mao; Liang Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  On the use of flexible excess hazard regression models for describing long-term breast cancer survival: a case-study using population-based cancer registry data.

Authors:  R Schaffar; A Belot; B Rachet; L Woods
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Uncovering interpretable potential confounders in electronic medical records.

Authors:  Jiaming Zeng; Michael F Gensheimer; Daniel L Rubin; Susan Athey; Ross D Shachter
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Bootstrap vs asymptotic variance estimation when using propensity score weighting with continuous and binary outcomes.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.497

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.