Literature DB >> 32185801

Flexible regression approach to propensity score analysis and its relationship with matching and weighting.

Huzhang Mao1,2, Liang Li2.   

Abstract

In propensity score analysis, the frequently used regression adjustment involves regressing the outcome on the estimated propensity score and treatment indicator. This approach can be highly efficient when model assumptions are valid, but can lead to biased results when the assumptions are violated. We extend the simple regression adjustment to a varying coefficient regression model that allows for nonlinear association between outcome and propensity score. We discuss its connection with some propensity score matching and weighting methods, and show that the proposed analytical framework can shed light on the intrinsic connection among some mainstream propensity score approaches (stratification, regression, kernel matching, and inverse probability weighting) and handle commonly used causal estimands. We derive analytic point and variance estimators that properly take into account the sampling variability in the estimated propensity score. Extensive simulations show that the proposed approach possesses desired finite sample properties and demonstrates competitive performance in comparison with other methods estimating the same causal estimand. The proposed methodology is illustrated with a study on right heart catheterization.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  matching; regression adjustment; stratification; varying coefficient model; weighting

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32185801      PMCID: PMC9110115          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.497


  21 in total

1.  Variance estimation for stratified propensity score estimators.

Authors:  E J Williamson; R Morley; A Lucas; J R Carpenter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Estimating exposure effects by modelling the expectation of exposure conditional on confounders.

Authors:  J M Robins; S D Mark; W K Newey
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Paul Grootendorst; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Comparing treatments via the propensity score: stratification or modeling?

Authors:  Jessica A Myers; Thomas A Louis
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03

6.  Estimation of causal effects of binary treatments in unconfounded studies with one continuous covariate.

Authors:  R Gutman; D B Rubin
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data.

Authors:  Yu Xie; Jennie E Brand; Ben Jann
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2012-08

8.  On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Baiming Zou; Fei Zou; Jonathan J Shuster; Patrick J Tighe; Gary G Koch; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.

Authors:  A F Connors; T Speroff; N V Dawson; C Thomas; F E Harrell; D Wagner; N Desbiens; L Goldman; A W Wu; R M Califf; W J Fulkerson; H Vidaillet; S Broste; P Bellamy; J Lynn; W A Knaus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Bias associated with using the estimated propensity score as a regression covariate.

Authors:  Erinn M Hade; Bo Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does Internet Use Impact the Health Status of Middle-Aged and Older Populations? Evidence from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).

Authors:  Liqing Li; Haifeng Ding; Zihan Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.