| Literature DB >> 29853770 |
Mariana R P Alves1,2, Raquel Boia1,2, Elisa J Campos1,2, João Martins1,2, Sara Nunes1,2, Maria H Madeira1,2, Ana Raquel Santiago1,2,3, Frederico C Pereira1,2, Flávio Reis1,2, António F Ambrósio1,2,3, Filipa I Baptista1,2.
Abstract
Purpose: Diabetic retinopathy is a neurovascular disease characterized by increased permeability of the blood-retinal barrier, changes in the neural components of the retina, and low-grade chronic inflammation. Diabetic retinopathy is a major complication of diabetes; however, the impact of a prediabetic state on the retina remains to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess possible early retinal changes in prediabetic rats, by evaluating changes in the integrity of the blood-retinal barrier, the retinal structure, neural markers, and inflammatory mediators.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29853770 PMCID: PMC5957544
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
List of primary antibodies used.
| Primary antibody | Sample | Antibody dilution | Protein (μg) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse anti-Vimentin | Total Extracts Retina | 1:5000 | 10 | Thermo Scientific |
| | Immunohistochemistry | 1:200 | - | Thermo Scientific |
| Rabbit anti-Occludin | Total Extracts Retina | 1:250 | 20 | Invitrogen |
| Mouse anti-iNOS | Total Extracts Retina | 1:500 | 40 | Abcam |
| Rabbit anti-Claudin-5 | Total Extracts Retina | 1:250 | 10 | Invitrogen |
| Rabbit anti-TUJ-1 | Total Extracts Retina | 1:2500 | 10 | Abcam |
| | Immunohistochemistry | 1:1000 | - | Abcam |
| Rabbit anti-Actin | Total Extracts Retina | 1:5000 | 10 | Sigma |
| Mouse anti-GFAP | Total Extracts Retina | 1:5000 | 10 | Calbiochem |
| | Immunohistochemistry | 1:500 | - | Calbiochem |
| Mouse anti-synaptophysin | Total Extracts Retina | 1:1000 | 10 | Sigma |
| | Immunohistochemistry | 1:200 | - | Sigma |
| Rabbit anti-ZO-1 | Total Extracts Retina | 1:250 | 40 | Invitrogen |
| Rabbit anti-Iba-1 | Immunohistochemistry | 1:1000 | _ | Wako |
| Mouse anti-MHC-II | Immunohistochemistry | 1:200 | _ | AbD Serotec |
Primer sequences.
| Gene | Forward primer (5′-3′) | Reverse primer (5′-3′) | Amplicon size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reference genes | |||
| ATGGGAGGCCATCACATTGT | ATGTAATCCAGCAGGTCAGCAA | 77 | |
| CAAGCATACCAAGAAGCATTTGA | GGGCCAGACCCAGTCTGA | 76 | |
| GCAACAGGAGTCGGCTACCA | GCATAGGGAAGCCAGCAGATC | 76 | |
| Target genes | |||
| CCCAATCTGTGTCCTTCT | TTCTGAGCATCGTAGTTGT | 90 | |
| ATAGAAGTCAAGACCAAAGTG | GACCATTGCTGTTTCCTAG | 109 | |
| AGAGACAGAAGTGCGATC | AGATTCAGTAGTCCACAATAGTA | 96 | |
| ACCCTGTTCGTTTCAAATAG | AGCGTTTATCCCTGGTAAT | 104 | |
| TGTATTCGGCCATGGGGTATG | GAGCCAGCTGACCAGTGTAG | 105 | |
| Qualitative PCR | |||
| GCTCCTCCTGAGCGCAAG | CATCTGCTGGAAGGTGGACA | 75 | |
Metabolic and biochemical data of control and HSu groups for 9 weeks.
| Parameters | Control | HSu |
|---|---|---|
| Bodyweight (g) | 486.50±16.70 | 496.67±11.83 |
| Glycemic profile | | |
| Postprandial glycemia (mg/dl) | 200.00±7.87 | 245.00±8.38** |
| Fasting glycemia (mg/dl) | 96.81±1.72 | 101.64±1.24 |
| Glucose AUC-GTT (mg/dl/120 min) | 29,209.17±2429.31 | 43,438.60±3905.57* |
| HbA1c (%) | 3.78±0.037 | 3.9±0.045 |
| Insulinemic profile and insulin resistance | | |
| Fasting insulin (µg/l) | 2.03±0.18 | 2.59±0.61 |
| HOMA-IR (x10−5) | 1.40±0.14 | 2.47±0.35* |
| Glucose ITT 0 min (mg/dl) | 108.20±4.74 | 118.00±2.47 |
| Glucose ITT 15 min (mg/dl) | 97.50±6.61 | 122.20±6.91* |
| Glucose ITT 30 min (mg/dl) | 78.17±2.0 | 91.50±4.06* |
| Glucose ITT 45 min (mg/dl) | 75.17±3.79 | 87.83±3.18* |
| Glucose ITT 60 min (mg/dl) | 67.00±4.83 | 75.67±6.92 |
| Glucose ITT 120 min (mg/dl) | 65.33±6.90 | 90.5±11.55 |
| Lipid profile | | |
| Total-Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 61.50±3.15 | 60.83±4.80 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 146.70±17.84 | 235.3±38.87* |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, *p<0.05; **p<0.01 versus the Control group (n=5/6). AUC, area under the curve; GTT, glucose tolerance test; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobina; HOMA-IR, Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance; ITT, insulin tolerance test.
Figure 1Chronic HSu treatment does not affect tight junction proteins and BRB permeability in the retina. A: The permeability of the blood–retinal barrier (BRB) was assessed with the Evans blue dye method. The results are expressed as milligrams of Evans blue per grams of retina, and are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). B: The content of tight junction proteins (claudin-5, occludin, and ZO-1) were analyzed with western blotting in total retinal extracts obtained from control and high sucrose (HSu)-treated animals. Representative images of immunoreactive protein bands are presented above the graphs, as well as the respective loading control (β-actin). The results are expressed as a percentage of the age-matched controls, and data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 2High sucrose diet induces a decrease in retinal thickness. A: Representative fundus image of a rat eye showing the line scan (green line) and the corresponding retinal tomographic images. Retinal thickness was assessed in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images obtained from different bright-field eye fundus scans. B: Retinal tomographic images obtained from the linear scans were used to evaluate the thickness of the retinal layers (the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), the ganglion cell layer (GCL), and the inner plexiform layer (IPL), the inner nuclear layer (INL), the outer nuclear layer (ONL), the inner segments (IS) and the outer segments (OS), and the total) from control and high sucrose (HSu)-treated animals. Data are expressed as a variation in the retinal thickness of the HSu-treated animals relative to the control animals and are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of four to six animals. *p<0.05 statistically significantly different from the respective age-matched control. C: Nuclei were stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and the number of DAPI-positive cells in the GCL was counted. Results are presented as the number of DAPI-positive cells per millimeter of retina and represent the mean fold change of the control ± SEM. Scale bar: 50 μm. D: Cell death was evaluated with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) dUTP nick-End labeling (TUNEL) assay (green) in the control and HSu-treated animals, and in a DNase-positive control. Scale bar: 50 μm. E: The number of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) was assessed with immunolabeling of the retinal sections with Brn3a (a RGC-specific marker), and Brn3a mRNA levels were evaluated with quantitative PCR (qPCR). Results are presented as the number of Brn3a-positive cells per millimeter of retina and represent the mean fold change of the control ± SEM. Scale bar: 50 μm. The qPCR results are presented as the fold change of the control retinas.
Figure 3HSu treatment does not affect neuronal and glial markers. The neuronal markers TUJ-1 (A) and synaptophysin (B) and the glial markers vimentin (C) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (D) were analyzed with immunoblotting in the total retinal extracts obtained from control and high sucrose (HSu) animals. Representative images of protein immunoreactive bands are presented above the graphs, with the respective loading control (β-actin). The results are expressed as a percentage of the age-matched controls, and data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Representative images from immunohistochemistry of the described proteins (red) are presented below the graphs, with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; nuclei) staining in blue. Scale bar: 50 μm.
Figure 4HSu treatment does not induce a proinflammatory state in the retina. A: The mRNA levels of inducible nitric oxide synthase isoform (iNOS) were assessed with quantitative PCR (qPCR). The results are presented as the mean fold change of the control ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of 10 animals. The iNOS protein levels were analyzed with western blotting. A representative image of the iNOS immunoreactive bands is presented above the graph. The results are expressed as a percentage of the age-matched controls, and data are presented as mean ± SEM of 7-8 animals. B: Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) transcript and protein levels were assessed with quantitative PCR (qPCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), respectively. The qPCR results are presented as the mean fold change of the control ± SEM of 11 animals. The ELISA results are expressed as a percentage of the age-matched controls, and data are presented as mean ± SEM of 3-5 animals.
Figure 5HSu treatment does not statistically significantly increase the number of microglial cells in the retina. A: Retinal sections were immunostained for microglia (Iba1; red) and for reactive microglia (MHC-II; green). Nuclei were stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) ; blue). Scale bar: 50 μm. B: Translocator protein (TSPO; a marker of reactive microglia) transcript levels were assessed with quantitative PCR (qPCR), and results are presented as the mean fold change of the control ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of 6 animals. C: The number of Iba1-positive cells was counted in the retinal sections from the control and high sucrose (HSu)-treated animals. Results are presented as the number of Iba1-positive cells per millimeter of retina in each retinal layer and represent the mean ± SEM. Scale bar: 50 μm.