Literature DB >> 29853485

Diagnostic assessment of a deep learning system for detecting atrial fibrillation in pulse waveforms.

Ming-Zher Poh1, Yukkee Cheung Poh1, Pak-Hei Chan2, Chun-Ka Wong2, Louise Pun3, Wangie Wan-Chiu Leung3, Yu-Fai Wong3, Michelle Man-Ying Wong3, Daniel Wai-Sing Chu3, Chung-Wah Siu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a deep learning system for automated detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) in photoplethysmographic (PPG) pulse waveforms.
METHODS: We trained a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) to detect AF in 17 s PPG waveforms using a training data set of 149 048 PPG waveforms constructed from several publicly available PPG databases. The DCNN was validated using an independent test data set of 3039 smartphone-acquired PPG waveforms from adults at high risk of AF at a general outpatient clinic against ECG tracings reviewed by two cardiologists. Six established AF detectors based on handcrafted features were evaluated on the same test data set for performance comparison.
RESULTS: In the validation data set (3039 PPG waveforms) consisting of three sequential PPG waveforms from 1013 participants (mean (SD) age, 68.4 (12.2) years; 46.8% men), the prevalence of AF was 2.8%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the DCNN for AF detection was 0.997 (95% CI 0.996 to 0.999) and was significantly higher than all the other AF detectors (AUC range: 0.924-0.985). The sensitivity of the DCNN was 95.2% (95% CI 88.3% to 98.7%), specificity was 99.0% (95% CI 98.6% to 99.3%), positive predictive value (PPV) was 72.7% (95% CI 65.1% to 79.3%) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 99.9% (95% CI 99.7% to 100%) using a single 17 s PPG waveform. Using the three sequential PPG waveforms in combination (<1 min in total), the sensitivity was 100.0% (95% CI 87.7% to 100%), specificity was 99.6% (95% CI 99.0% to 99.9%), PPV was 87.5% (95% CI 72.5% to 94.9%) and NPV was 100% (95% CI 99.4% to 100%).
CONCLUSIONS: In this evaluation of PPG waveforms from adults screened for AF in a real-world primary care setting, the DCNN had high sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for detecting AF, outperforming other state-of-the-art methods based on handcrafted features. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; ehealth/telemedicine/mobile health; premature ventricular beats

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29853485     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  24 in total

Review 1.  Connected Health Technology for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Management.

Authors:  Shannon Wongvibulsin; Seth S Martin; Steven R Steinhubl; Evan D Muse
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-05-18

2.  Visual Reassessment with Flux-Interval Plot Configuration after Automatic Classification for Accurate Atrial Fibrillation Detection by Photoplethysmography.

Authors:  Justin Chu; Wen-Tse Yang; Yao-Ting Chang; Fu-Liang Yang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using a Ring-Type Wearable Device (CardioTracker) and Deep Learning Analysis of Photoplethysmography Signals: Prospective Observational Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Soonil Kwon; Joonki Hong; Eue-Keun Choi; Byunghwan Lee; Changhyun Baik; Euijae Lee; Eui-Rim Jeong; Bon-Kwon Koo; Seil Oh; Yung Yi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Deep Learning Approaches to Detect Atrial Fibrillation Using Photoplethysmographic Signals: Algorithms Development Study.

Authors:  Soonil Kwon; Joonki Hong; Eue-Keun Choi; Euijae Lee; David Earl Hostallero; Wan Ju Kang; Byunghwan Lee; Eui-Rim Jeong; Bon-Kwon Koo; Seil Oh; Yung Yi
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Machine learning algorithms estimating prognosis and guiding therapy in adult congenital heart disease: data from a single tertiary centre including 10 019 patients.

Authors:  Gerhard-Paul Diller; Aleksander Kempny; Sonya V Babu-Narayan; Marthe Henrichs; Margarita Brida; Anselm Uebing; Astrid E Lammers; Helmut Baumgartner; Wei Li; Stephen J Wort; Konstantinos Dimopoulos; Michael A Gatzoulis
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 6.  Returning Cardiac Rhythm Data to Patients: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Ruth Masterson Creber; Meghan Reading Turchioe
Journal:  Card Electrophysiol Clin       Date:  2021-07-02

7.  Review of mobile applications for the detection and management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Meghan Reading Turchioe; Victoria Jimenez; Samuel Isaac; Munther Alshalabi; David Slotwiner; Ruth Masterson Creber
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-04-27

Review 8.  Path to precision: prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Rinku Skaria; Saman Parvaneh; Sophia Zhou; James Kim; Santana Wanjiru; Genoveffa Devers; John Konhilas; Zain Khalpey
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.005

9.  Analysis of Relevant Features from Photoplethysmographic Signals for Atrial Fibrillation Classification.

Authors:  César A Millán; Nathalia A Girón; Diego M Lopez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Validation of Single Centre Pre-Mobile Atrial Fibrillation Apps for Continuous Monitoring of Atrial Fibrillation in a Real-World Setting: Pilot Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Jie Zhang; Hong-Bao Li; Yi-Xin Chen; Bin Yang; Yu-Tao Guo; Yun-Dai Chen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.