Gerhard-Paul Diller1,2,3,4, Aleksander Kempny1,2, Sonya V Babu-Narayan1,2, Marthe Henrichs3, Margarita Brida1,5, Anselm Uebing1,6, Astrid E Lammers6, Helmut Baumgartner3,4, Wei Li1,2, Stephen J Wort1,2, Konstantinos Dimopoulos1,2, Michael A Gatzoulis1,2. 1. Adult Congenital Heart Centre, National Centre for Pulmonary Hypertension, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, UK. 2. National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Dovehouse Street, London, UK. 3. Department of Cardiology III - Adult Congenital and Valvular Heart Disease, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Muenster, Germany. 4. Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects, DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany. 5. Division of Valvular Heart Disease and Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Kispaticeva 12, Zagreb, Croatia. 6. Division of Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Muenster, Germany.
Abstract
AIMS: To assess the utility of machine learning algorithms on estimating prognosis and guiding therapy in a large cohort of patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) or pulmonary hypertension at a single, tertiary centre. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 10 019 adult patients (age 36.3 ± 17.3 years) under follow-up at our institution between 2000 and 2018. Clinical and demographic data, ECG parameters, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and selected laboratory markers where collected and included in deep learning (DL) algorithms. Specific DL-models were built based on raw data to categorize diagnostic group, disease complexity, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. In addition, models were developed to estimate need for discussion at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings and to gauge prognosis of individual patients. Overall, the DL-algorithms-based on over 44 000 medical records-categorized diagnosis, disease complexity, and NYHA class with an accuracy of 91.1%, 97.0%, and 90.6%, respectively in the test sample. Similarly, patient presentation at MDT-meetings was predicted with a test sample accuracy of 90.2%. During a median follow-up time of 8 years, 785 patients died. The automatically derived disease severity-score derived from clinical information was related to survival on Cox analysis independently of demographic, exercise, laboratory, and ECG parameters. CONCLUSION: We present herewith the utility of machine learning algorithms trained on large datasets to estimate prognosis and potentially to guide therapy in ACHD. Due to the largely automated process involved, these DL-algorithms can easily be scaled to multi-institutional datasets to further improve accuracy and ultimately serve as online based decision-making tools. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: To assess the utility of machine learning algorithms on estimating prognosis and guiding therapy in a large cohort of patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) or pulmonary hypertension at a single, tertiary centre. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 10 019 adult patients (age 36.3 ± 17.3 years) under follow-up at our institution between 2000 and 2018. Clinical and demographic data, ECG parameters, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and selected laboratory markers where collected and included in deep learning (DL) algorithms. Specific DL-models were built based on raw data to categorize diagnostic group, disease complexity, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. In addition, models were developed to estimate need for discussion at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings and to gauge prognosis of individual patients. Overall, the DL-algorithms-based on over 44 000 medical records-categorized diagnosis, disease complexity, and NYHA class with an accuracy of 91.1%, 97.0%, and 90.6%, respectively in the test sample. Similarly, patient presentation at MDT-meetings was predicted with a test sample accuracy of 90.2%. During a median follow-up time of 8 years, 785 patients died. The automatically derived disease severity-score derived from clinical information was related to survival on Cox analysis independently of demographic, exercise, laboratory, and ECG parameters. CONCLUSION: We present herewith the utility of machine learning algorithms trained on large datasets to estimate prognosis and potentially to guide therapy in ACHD. Due to the largely automated process involved, these DL-algorithms can easily be scaled to multi-institutional datasets to further improve accuracy and ultimately serve as online based decision-making tools. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Helmut Baumgartner; Philipp Bonhoeffer; Natasja M S De Groot; Fokko de Haan; John Erik Deanfield; Nazzareno Galie; Michael A Gatzoulis; Christa Gohlke-Baerwolf; Harald Kaemmerer; Philip Kilner; Folkert Meijboom; Barbara J M Mulder; Erwin Oechslin; Jose M Oliver; Alain Serraf; Andras Szatmari; Erik Thaulow; Pascal R Vouhe; Edmond Walma Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-08-27 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Xiaoying Yang; Colin O Wu; Kiang Liu; W Gregory Hundley; Robyn McClelland; Antoinette S Gomes; Aaron R Folsom; Steven Shea; Eliseo Guallar; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima Journal: Circ Res Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Darren Mylotte; Louise Pilote; Raluca Ionescu-Ittu; Michal Abrahamowicz; Paul Khairy; Judith Therrien; Andrew S Mackie; Ariane Marelli Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Roberta G Williams; Gail D Pearson; Robyn J Barst; John S Child; Pedro del Nido; Welton M Gersony; Karen S Kuehl; Michael J Landzberg; Merle Myerson; Steven R Neish; David J Sahn; Amy Verstappen; Carole A Warnes; Catherine L Webb Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-01-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Danielle F Pace; Adrian V Dalca; Tal Geva; Andrew J Powell; Mehdi H Moghari; Polina Golland Journal: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Date: 2015-11-18
Authors: Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2020-07-09
Authors: John Harry Caufield; Dibakar Sigdel; John Fu; Howard Choi; Vladimir Guevara-Gonzalez; Ding Wang; Peipei Ping Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 13.081