Literature DB >> 29851025

Decomposing Pearson's χ2 test: A linear regression and its departure from linearity.

Zhengyang Zhou1,2,3, Hung-Chih Ku4, Guan Xing5, Chao Xing1,2,6.   

Abstract

In case-control genetic association studies, a standard practice is to perform the Cochran-Armitage (CA) trend test under the assumption of the additive model because of its robustness. We could even identify situations in which it outperformed the analysis model consistent with the underlying inheritance mode. In this article, we analytically reveal the statistical basis that leads to the phenomenon. By elucidating the origin of the CA trend test as a linear regression model, we decompose Pearson's χ2 -test statistic into two components-one is the CA trend test statistic that measures the goodness of fit of the linear regression model, and the other measures the discrepancy between data and the linear regression model. Under this framework, we show that the additive coding scheme, as well as the multiplicative coding scheme, increases the coefficient of determination of the regression model by increasing the spread of data points. We also obtain the conditions under which the CA trend test statistic equals the MAX statistic and Pearson's χ2 -test statistic.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/University College London.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pearson's chi-squared test; linear regression; ordinary least squares; trend test

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29851025      PMCID: PMC6105398          DOI: 10.1111/ahg.12257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Genet        ISSN: 0003-4800            Impact factor:   2.180


  13 in total

1.  Trend tests for case-control studies of genetic markers: power, sample size and robustness.

Authors:  B Freidlin; G Zheng; Z Li; J L Gastwirth
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Cochran-Armitage test versus logistic regression in the analysis of genetic association studies.

Authors:  Stefan Wellek; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  Man bites dog? The validity of maximizing lod scores to determine mode of inheritance.

Authors:  R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1989-12

4.  Maximizing association statistics over genetic models.

Authors:  Juan R González; Josep L Carrasco; Frank Dudbridge; Lluís Armengol; Xavier Estivill; Victor Moreno
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  What's the best statistic for a simple test of genetic association in a case-control study?

Authors:  Chia-Ling Kuo; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  From genotypes to genes: doubling the sample size.

Authors:  P D Sasieni
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Differentiating the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test and Pearson's χ2 Test: Location and Dispersion.

Authors:  Zhengyang Zhou; Hung-Chih Ku; Zhipeng Huang; Guan Xing; Chao Xing
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 1.670

8.  Robust tests for single-marker analysis in case-control genetic association studies.

Authors:  Qizhai Li; Gang Zheng; Xueying Liang; Kai Yu
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  Pearson's test, trend test, and MAX are all trend tests with different types of scores.

Authors:  Gang Zheng; Jungnam Joo; Yaning Yang
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  A unifying framework for robust association testing, estimation, and genetic model selection using the generalized linear model.

Authors:  Christina Loley; Inke R König; Ludwig Hothorn; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Factors associated with the reporting quality of low back pain systematic review abstracts in physical therapy: a methodological study.

Authors:  Dafne Port Nascimento; Gabrielle Zoldan Gonzalez; Amanda Costa Araujo; Anne Moseley; Christopher Maher; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.377

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.