Literature DB >> 23572026

A unifying framework for robust association testing, estimation, and genetic model selection using the generalized linear model.

Christina Loley1, Inke R König, Ludwig Hothorn, Andreas Ziegler.   

Abstract

The analysis of genome-wide genetic association studies generally starts with univariate statistical tests of each single-nucleotide polymorphism. The standard approach is the Cochran-Armitage trend test or its logistic regression equivalent although this approach can lose considerable power if the underlying genetic model is not additive. An alternative is the MAX test, which is robust against the three basic modes of inheritance. Here, the asymptotic distribution of the MAX test is derived using the generalized linear model together with the Delta method and multiple contrasts. The approach is applicable to binary, quantitative, and survival traits. It may be used for unrelated individuals, family-based studies, and matched pairs. The approach provides point and interval effect estimates and allows selecting the most plausible genetic model using the minimum P-value. R code is provided. A Monte-Carlo simulation study shows that the asymptotic MAX test framework meets type I error levels well, has good power, and good model selection properties for minor allele frequencies ≥0.3. Pearson's χ(2)-test is superior for lower minor allele frequencies with low frequencies for the rare homozygous genotype. In these cases, the model selection procedure should be used with caution. The use of the MAX test is illustrated by reanalyzing findings from seven genome-wide association studies including case-control, matched pairs, and quantitative trait data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23572026      PMCID: PMC3820468          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  29 in total

1.  Robust trend tests for genetic association using matched case-control design.

Authors:  Gang Zheng; Xin Tian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Efficient approximation of P-value of the maximum of correlated tests, with applications to genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Qizhai Li; Gang Zheng; Zhaohai Li; Kai Yu
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 1.670

3.  A robust genome-wide scan statistic of the Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium.

Authors:  Jungnam Joo; Minjung Kwak; Kwangmi Ahn; Gang Zheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A unification of multivariate methods for meta-analysis of genetic association studies.

Authors:  Pantelis G Bagos
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2008-10-24

5.  Order-restricted scores test for the evaluation of population-based case-control studies when the genetic model is unknown.

Authors:  Ludwig A Hothorn; Torsten Hothorn
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  MAX-rank: a simple and robust genome-wide scan for case-control association studies.

Authors:  Qizhai Li; Kai Yu; Zhaohai Li; Gang Zheng
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Bayesian statistical methods for genetic association studies.

Authors:  Matthew Stephens; David J Balding
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Robust tests for single-marker analysis in case-control genetic association studies.

Authors:  Qizhai Li; Gang Zheng; Xueying Liang; Kai Yu
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  Pearson's test, trend test, and MAX are all trend tests with different types of scores.

Authors:  Gang Zheng; Jungnam Joo; Yaning Yang
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Nonadditive Effects of Genes in Human Metabolomics.

Authors:  Yakov A Tsepilov; So-Youn Shin; Nicole Soranzo; Tim D Spector; Cornelia Prehn; Jerzy Adamski; Gabi Kastenmüller; Rui Wang-Sattler; Konstantin Strauch; Christian Gieger; Yurii S Aulchenko; Janina S Ried
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Differentiating the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test and Pearson's χ2 Test: Location and Dispersion.

Authors:  Zhengyang Zhou; Hung-Chih Ku; Zhipeng Huang; Guan Xing; Chao Xing
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 1.670

3.  Decomposing Pearson's χ2 test: A linear regression and its departure from linearity.

Authors:  Zhengyang Zhou; Hung-Chih Ku; Guan Xing; Chao Xing
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.180

4.  Gain of power of the general regression model compared to Cochran-Armitage Trend tests: simulation study and application to bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Dizier; Florence Demenais; Flavie Mathieu
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  Genetic model misspecification in genetic association studies.

Authors:  Amadou Gaye; Sharon K Davis
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-11-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.