Literature DB >> 29850096

2-[(4-Chloro-phen-yl)sulfan-yl]-2-meth-oxy-1-phenyl-ethan-1-one: crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis.

Ignez Caracelli1, Julio Zukerman-Schpector2, Henrique J Traesel3, Paulo R Olivato3, Mukesh M Jotani4, Edward R T Tiekink5.   

Abstract

The title compound, C15H13ClO2S, comprises (4-chloro-phen-yl)sulfanyl, benzaldehyde and meth-oxy residues linked at a chiral methine-C atom (the crystal is racemic). A twist in the methine-C-C(carbon-yl) bond [O-C-C-O torsion angle = 19.3 (7)°] leads to a dihedral angle of 22.2 (5)° between the benzaldehyde and methine+meth-oxy residues. The chloro-benzene ring is folded to lie over the O atoms, with the dihedral angle between the benzene rings being 42.9 (2)°. In the crystal, the carbonyl-O atom accepts two C-H⋯O inter-actions with methyl- and methine-C-H atoms being the donors. The result is an helical supra-molecular chain aligned along the c axis; chains pack with no directional inter-actions between them. An analysis of the Hirshfeld surface points to the important contributions of weak H⋯H and CC contacts to the mol-ecular packing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surface analysis; NCI plots; crystal structure; phenyl­ethanone; sulfan­yl

Year:  2018        PMID: 29850096      PMCID: PMC5947492          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018006072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

As part of our ongoing studies on the conformational and electronic characteristics of some β-thio­carbonyl, β-bis-thio­carbonyl and β-thio-β-oxacarbonyl compounds, e.g. N,N-diethyl-2-[(4′-substituted)phenyl­thio]­acetamides (Vinhato et al., 2013 ▸), 1-methyl-3-phenyl­sulfonyl-2-piperidones (Zuker­man-Schpector et al., 2008 ▸), 3,3-bis­[(4′-substituted) phenyl­sulfan­yl]-1-methyl-2-piperidones (Olivato et al., 2013 ▸), 2-alkyl­thio-2-alkyl­sulfinyl-aceto­phenones and 2-alkyl­thio-2-phenyl­sulfonyl-aceto­phenones, 2-alkyl­sulfinyl-2-alkyl­sulfonyl-aceto­phenones (Distefano et al., 1996 ▸), 2-meth­oxy-2-[(4′-substituted) phenyl­sulfan­yl]-aceto­phenones (Zukerman-Schpector et al., 2015 ▸; Caracelli et al., 2015 ▸) and 2-meth­oxy-2-(phenyl­selan­yl)-(4′-substituted)aceto­phenones (Traesel et al., 2018 ▸), utilizing infrared spectroscopy, computational chemistry and X-ray diffraction methods, the title compound (I) was synthesized and characterized. The primary motivation behind this work is the search for selenium/sulfur-containing compounds with anti-inflammatory activity that could be selective COX-2 inhibitors (Cerqueira et al., 2015 ▸, 2017 ▸). Mol­ecular docking studies have also been conducted in order to understand the mechanism of inhibition (Baptistini, 2015 ▸). Herein, the crystal and mol­ecular structures of (I) are described along with an analysis of the calculated Hirshfeld surfaces and non-covalent inter­action plots for selected inter­actions.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of (I) sees (4-chloro­phen­yl)sulfanyl, phenyl­ethanone and meth­oxy groups linked at the chiral methine-C8 atom, Fig. 1 ▸. In the arbitrarily chosen asymmetric mol­ecule, C8 has an R configuration, but crystal symmetry generates a racemic mixture. The base of the mol­ecule is defined by the phenyl­ethanone [r.m.s. deviation of the eight non-hydrogen atoms = 0.0134 Å] and meth­oxy groups. These residues are not co-planar, with the dihedral angle between the two planes being 22.2 (5)° owing to the twist about the C8—C9 bond as seen in the value of the O1—C8—C9—O2 torsion angle of 19.3 (7)°. The 4-chloro­phenyl group is orientated so that the ring lies over the oxygen atoms with the dihedral angle between the benzene rings being 42.9 (2)°.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of (I), showing the atom-labelling scheme and displacement ellipsoids at the 35% probability level.

Supra­molecular features

The mol­ecular packing of (I) features C—H⋯O inter­actions where the donors are methyl-C7 and methine-C8 H atoms, and the acceptor is the carbonyl-O2 atom, Table 1 ▸. These inter­actions combine to sustain a supra­molecular chain along [001] with an helical topology as it is propagated by 21 symmetry, Fig. 2 ▸ a. Chains assemble into the three-dimensional architecture without directional inter­actions between them, Fig. 2 ▸ b.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C7—H7A⋯O2i 0.962.533.297 (9)137
C8—H8⋯O2i 0.982.423.305 (8)150

Symmetry code: (i) .

Figure 2

Mol­ecular packing in (I): (a) view of the supra­molecular chain parallel to the c axis and (b) view of the unit-cell contents shown in projection down the b axis; one chain is highlighted in space-filling mode. The C—H⋯O contacts are shown as orange dashed lines.

Hirshfeld surface analysis

The Hirshfeld surface calculations for (I) were performed as per a recent study (Zukerman-Schpector et al., 2017 ▸) and serve to provide additional information on the mol­ecular packing, in particular the weaker inter­actions between mol­ecules. In addition to bright-red spots near the methyl-H7A and methine-H8 atoms, a pair near the carbonyl-O2 atom arise as a result of the C—H⋯O inter­actions leading to the supra­molecular chain discussed above, Table 1 ▸. The presence of diminutive and faint-red spots on the Hirshfeld surfaces illustrated in Fig. 3 ▸ indicate the influence of short inter­atomic contacts on the mol­ecular packing in the crystal, Table 2 ▸. Thus, the CC and C⋯H/H⋯C contacts involving chloro­benzene-C6, carbonyl-C9 and methyl-H7C atoms are viewed as the pair of diminutive and faint-red spots near these atoms in Fig. 3 ▸, whereas similar features near the methyl-H7B, phenyl-C14 and -H14 atoms represent H7B⋯H14 and C⋯H/H⋯C contacts. Views of the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over electrostatic potential are shown in Fig. 4 ▸ and also indicate the donors and acceptors of the C—H⋯O inter­actions through the appearance of intense-blue and -red regions around the participating atoms. Fig. 5 ▸ illustrates the environment around a reference mol­ecule within the d norm-mapped Hirshfeld surface and highlight the inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­actions and short inter­atomic H⋯H, C⋯H/H⋯C and CC contacts.
Figure 3

Two views of the Hirshfeld surface for (I) mapped over d norm in the range −0.073 to +1.389 au.

Table 2

Summary of short inter­atomic contacts (Å) in (I)

ContactDistanceSymmetry operation
H7B⋯H142.101 − x, − y,  + z
H7B⋯C142.761 − x, − y,  + z
H7C⋯C62.731 − x, 1 − y,  + z
C6⋯C93.331 − x, − y,  + z
Figure 4

Two views of the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over the electrostatic potential in the range −0.073 to + 0.056 au. The red and blue regions represent negative and positive electrostatic potentials, respectively.

Figure 5

A view of the Hirshfeld surface mapped over d norm in the range −0.073 to +1.389 au highlighting inter­molecular C—H⋯O, C⋯C, H⋯H and C⋯H/H⋯C contacts by black, red, yellow and sky-blue dashed lines, respectively.

The non-symmetric mol­ecular geometry in (I) results in an asymmetric distribution of points in its overall two-dimensional fingerprint plot shown in Fig. 6 ▸ and also in those delin­eated into H⋯H, C⋯H/H⋯C, Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl, O⋯H/H⋯O and CC contacts (McKinnon et al., 2007 ▸), also illus­trated in Fig. 6 ▸. The major percentage contributions to the Hirshfeld surface are from (in descending order) H⋯H, C⋯H/H⋯C, Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl, O⋯H/H⋯O and S⋯H/H⋯S contacts along with a small, i.e. 0.6%, contribution from CC contacts as summarized in Table 3 ▸. These inter­actions result in distinctive features in their respective delineated fingerprint plots. The short inter­atomic H⋯H and C⋯H/H⋯C contacts are characterized as a pair of beak-shape tips at d e + d i ∼ 2.1 Å and the pair of parabolic distributions of points at around d e + d i < 2.8 Å in their respective delineated fingerprint plots. The short inter­atomic C⋯H/H⋯C contacts in the crystal, Table 2 ▸, appear as a pair of thin tips at d e + d i ∼ 2.7 Å attached to the aforementioned parabolic distribution. The inter­atomic Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl contacts, making the next most significant contribution to the Hirshfeld surface, i.e. 12.8%, are at van der Waals separations. The C—H⋯O contacts, involving the carbonyl-O2 with methyl-C7 H and methine-C8 H atoms, Table 1 ▸, are evident as a pair of spikes with tips at d e + d i ∼ 2.3 Å. The vase-shaped distribution of points beginning at d e + d i ∼ 3.3 Å in the fingerprint plot delineated into CC contacts results from the contacts highlighted in Fig. 5 ▸ and Table 2 ▸. The small contribution from other remaining inter­atomic contacts summarized in Table 3 ▸ have a negligible influence upon the mol­ecular packing.
Figure 6

The full two-dimensional fingerprint plot for (I) and those delineated into H⋯H, C⋯H/H⋯C, Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl, O⋯H/H⋯O and C⋯C contacts.

Table 3

Percentage contributions of inter­atomic contacts to the Hirshfeld surface for (I)

ContactPercentage contribution
H⋯H39.3
C⋯H/H⋯C23.2
Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl12.8
O⋯H/H⋯O11.0
S⋯H/H⋯S4.4
Cl⋯S/S⋯Cl2.1
Cl⋯O/O⋯Cl2.1
C⋯O/O⋯C1.5
C⋯Cl/Cl⋯C1.5
C⋯S/S⋯C1.2
C⋯C0.6

Non-covalent inter­action plots

Non-covalent inter­action plots are a convenient means by which the nature of a specified inter­molecular inter­action may be assessed in terms of it being attractive or otherwise (Johnson et al., 2010 ▸; Contreras-García et al., 2011 ▸). If a specified inter­action is attractive, the isosurface will be blue in appearance whereas a repulsive inter­action will result in a red isosurface. On the other hand, a weakly attractive inter­action will appear green. The isosurfaces for the inter­actions between the methyl-C7 and methine-C H atoms and the carbonyl-O2 atom are shown in Fig. 7 ▸ a, clearly indicating their weakly attractive nature. Similarly, the inter­actions between the chloro­benzene-C6 and methyl-H7C atoms, Fig. 7 ▸ b, and between the methyl-H7B and phenyl-H14 atoms, Fig. 7 ▸ c, are weakly attractive.
Figure 7

Non-covalent inter­action plots for inter­molecular inter­actions between (a) methyl-C7- and methine-C—H atoms, and the carbonyl-O2 atom, (b) chloro­benzene-C6 and methyl-H7C atoms and (c) methyl-H7B and phenyl-H14 atoms.

Database survey

There are two closely related literature precedents for (I), namely the S-bound 4-meth­oxy­benzene [(II); Caracelli et al., 2015 ▸] and 4-tolyl [(III); Zukerman-Schpector et al., 2015 ▸] derivatives. The three compounds crystallize in the same Pca21 space group and present similar unit-cell dimensions. An overlay diagram for (I)–(III) is shown in Fig. 8 ▸ from which it can be noted there is a high degree of concordance for (I) and (III). The mol­ecule in (II) is coincident with (I) and (III) except for the relative disposition of the S-bound meth­oxy­benzene ring. This difference arises as a result of a twist about the C8—S1 bond as seen in the C4—S1—C8—C9 torsion angles of 57.3 (5), 46.6 (3) and 57.9 (3)° for (I)–(III), respectively. Despite this difference, the angles between the S-bound benzene rings and the phenyl rings in (I)–(III) are relatively constant at 42.9 (2), 40.11 (16) and 44.03 (16)°, respectively.
Figure 8

Overlay diagram of (a) (I), red image, (b) (II), green and (c) (III), blue.

Synthesis and crystallization

The 4′-chloro­phenyl di­sulfide precursor was prepared as previously described (Ali & McDermott, 2002 ▸) through the oxidation of 4′-chloro­thio­phenol by bromine. A solution of 2-meth­oxy aceto­phenone (0.70 ml, 5.08 mmol, Sigma–Aldrich) in THF (15 ml), was added dropwise to a cooled (195 K) solution of diiso­propyl­amine (0.78 ml, 5.59 mmol) and n-butyl­lithium (3.76 ml, 5.08 mmol) in THF (25 ml). After 30 min., a solution of 4′-chloro­phenyl di­sulfide (1.61 g, 5.08 mmol) with hexa­methyl­phospho­ramide (HMPA) (0.90 ml, ca 5.08 mmol) dissolved in THF (15 ml) was added dropwise to the enolate solution (Zoretic & Soja, 1976 ▸). After stirring for 3 h, water (50 ml) was added at room temperature and extraction with diethyl ether was performed. The organic layer was then treated with a saturated solution of ammonium chloride until neutral pH and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. A brown oil was obtained after evaporation of solvent. Purification through flash chromatography with n-hexane was used in order to remove the non-polar reactant (di­sulfide), then with dry acetone to give a mixture of both aceto­phenones (product and reactant). Crystallization was performed by vapour diffusion of n-hexane into a chloro­form solution held at 283 K to give pure product (0.4 g, yield = 60%). Irregular colourless crystals for X-ray diffraction of (I) were obtained by the same pathway. M.p. 358.2–358.8 K. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz, δ ppm): 3.67 (s, 3H), 5.86 (s, 1H), 7.24–7.29 (m, 4H), 7.44–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.57–7.60 (m, 1H), 7.93–7.95 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz, δ p.p.m.): 190.20, 135.60, 135.25, 134.23, 133.55, 129.22, 128.84, 128.59, 89.37, 56.13. Microanalysis calculated for C15H13ClO2S (%): C 61.53, H 4.48. Found (%): C 61.47, H 4.55. High-resolution MS [M +, M 2+] calculated: 292.0325, 294.0295; found: 292.0324, 294.0296.

Refinement details

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 4 ▸. The carbon-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.93–0.98 Å) and were included in the refinement in the riding-model approximation, with U iso(H) set to 1.2–1.5U eq(C).
Table 4

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC15H13ClO2S
M r 292.76
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P c a21
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)17.964 (3), 8.0234 (15), 9.7761 (19)
V3)1409.0 (5)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.41
Crystal size (mm)0.42 × 0.21 × 0.12
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
T min, T max 0.365, 0.745
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections5010, 2081, 1505
R int 0.049
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.594
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.048, 0.116, 1.04
No. of reflections2081
No. of parameters173
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.28, −0.18
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 465 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter0.06 (9)

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▸), SIR2014 (Burla et al., 2015 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▸), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ▸), MarvinSketch (ChemAxon, 2010 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018006072/hb7746sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018006072/hb7746Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018006072/hb7746Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1838590 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C15H13ClO2SDx = 1.380 Mg m3
Mr = 292.76Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pca21Cell parameters from 1839 reflections
a = 17.964 (3) Åθ = 2.5–23.7°
b = 8.0234 (15) ŵ = 0.41 mm1
c = 9.7761 (19) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1409.0 (5) Å3Irregular, colourless
Z = 40.42 × 0.21 × 0.12 mm
F(000) = 608
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1505 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.049
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.3°
Tmin = 0.365, Tmax = 0.745h = −20→21
5010 measured reflectionsk = −7→9
2081 independent reflectionsl = −11→8
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.043P)2 + 0.3264P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.116(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.28 e Å3
2081 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.18 e Å3
173 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 465 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
1 restraintAbsolute structure parameter: 0.06 (9)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.36121 (11)0.3177 (3)1.0687 (2)0.0916 (7)
S10.41934 (10)0.2492 (2)0.4390 (2)0.0646 (5)
O10.5511 (2)0.0919 (5)0.4909 (4)0.0616 (11)
O20.4654 (2)−0.1253 (5)0.6070 (4)0.0685 (12)
C10.3786 (4)0.2943 (8)0.8946 (7)0.0571 (17)
C20.3254 (4)0.2193 (8)0.8147 (9)0.069 (2)
H20.28120.18060.85270.083*
C30.3396 (4)0.2028 (8)0.6744 (8)0.0644 (18)
H30.30480.15060.61860.077*
C40.4045 (3)0.2632 (7)0.6186 (7)0.0529 (15)
C50.4565 (4)0.3385 (7)0.7019 (7)0.0579 (16)
H50.50050.37930.66470.069*
C60.4432 (4)0.3534 (8)0.8404 (7)0.0593 (18)
H60.47840.40380.89670.071*
C70.6003 (4)0.1950 (9)0.4167 (9)0.081 (2)
H7A0.60780.14920.32710.121*
H7B0.64720.20110.46370.121*
H7C0.57940.30470.40900.121*
C80.4828 (3)0.0677 (6)0.4279 (7)0.0504 (14)
H80.49150.04210.33120.060*
C90.4447 (3)−0.0804 (7)0.4942 (6)0.0493 (14)
C100.3836 (3)−0.1693 (7)0.4225 (7)0.0465 (13)
C110.3538 (3)−0.3095 (7)0.4869 (7)0.0577 (16)
H110.3719−0.34310.57160.069*
C120.2974 (3)−0.3981 (7)0.4246 (9)0.0690 (18)
H120.2784−0.49240.46740.083*
C130.2691 (4)−0.3500 (9)0.3017 (9)0.073 (2)
H130.2306−0.40970.26130.087*
C140.2984 (4)−0.2114 (9)0.2377 (8)0.075 (2)
H140.2794−0.17740.15370.090*
C150.3559 (3)−0.1224 (8)0.2978 (7)0.0621 (17)
H150.3758−0.03030.25310.075*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.1147 (15)0.1100 (15)0.0501 (11)0.0357 (11)0.0107 (12)−0.0064 (10)
S10.0977 (11)0.0519 (8)0.0441 (8)0.0100 (8)−0.0060 (11)0.0053 (8)
O10.072 (3)0.068 (3)0.045 (3)−0.012 (2)−0.002 (2)0.001 (2)
O20.103 (3)0.066 (3)0.037 (3)−0.010 (2)−0.008 (3)0.009 (2)
C10.074 (4)0.054 (4)0.042 (4)0.022 (3)0.005 (4)−0.003 (3)
C20.075 (5)0.061 (4)0.071 (5)0.002 (3)0.014 (4)−0.002 (4)
C30.073 (4)0.054 (4)0.066 (5)0.000 (3)−0.005 (4)−0.006 (3)
C40.074 (4)0.036 (3)0.048 (4)0.009 (3)−0.003 (4)0.001 (3)
C50.068 (4)0.051 (4)0.055 (4)0.005 (3)0.001 (4)−0.004 (3)
C60.068 (4)0.058 (4)0.052 (4)0.014 (3)−0.010 (3)−0.015 (3)
C70.087 (5)0.092 (5)0.063 (6)−0.026 (4)0.004 (5)−0.004 (5)
C80.068 (3)0.049 (3)0.034 (3)0.001 (3)0.003 (3)0.003 (3)
C90.075 (4)0.046 (3)0.028 (3)0.009 (3)0.009 (3)0.002 (3)
C100.061 (3)0.044 (3)0.035 (3)0.006 (3)0.006 (3)−0.002 (3)
C110.067 (4)0.056 (4)0.050 (4)0.005 (3)0.004 (3)0.008 (3)
C120.073 (4)0.053 (4)0.081 (6)−0.007 (3)0.012 (5)0.005 (4)
C130.073 (5)0.076 (5)0.069 (5)−0.011 (3)0.002 (4)−0.011 (4)
C140.088 (5)0.092 (5)0.046 (5)−0.003 (4)−0.010 (4)−0.006 (4)
C150.082 (4)0.059 (4)0.046 (4)−0.013 (3)−0.003 (4)0.001 (3)
Cl1—C11.741 (7)C7—H7B0.9600
S1—C41.780 (7)C7—H7C0.9600
S1—C81.853 (5)C8—C91.517 (7)
O1—C81.386 (6)C8—H80.9800
O1—C71.412 (8)C9—C101.485 (8)
O2—C91.219 (7)C10—C151.370 (9)
C1—C61.362 (9)C10—C111.395 (8)
C1—C21.372 (10)C11—C121.379 (9)
C2—C31.401 (10)C11—H110.9300
C2—H20.9300C12—C131.360 (11)
C3—C41.376 (9)C12—H120.9300
C3—H30.9300C13—C141.380 (9)
C4—C51.378 (8)C13—H130.9300
C5—C61.381 (9)C14—C151.387 (8)
C5—H50.9300C14—H140.9300
C6—H60.9300C15—H150.9300
C7—H7A0.9600
C4—S1—C8101.5 (3)O1—C8—S1114.1 (4)
C8—O1—C7114.1 (5)C9—C8—S1108.2 (4)
C6—C1—C2121.6 (7)O1—C8—H8108.6
C6—C1—Cl1119.7 (6)C9—C8—H8108.6
C2—C1—Cl1118.6 (6)S1—C8—H8108.6
C1—C2—C3118.2 (7)O2—C9—C10120.7 (5)
C1—C2—H2120.9O2—C9—C8118.8 (5)
C3—C2—H2120.9C10—C9—C8120.6 (5)
C4—C3—C2120.6 (6)C15—C10—C11118.9 (6)
C4—C3—H3119.7C15—C10—C9123.8 (5)
C2—C3—H3119.7C11—C10—C9117.3 (5)
C3—C4—C5119.6 (7)C12—C11—C10119.9 (7)
C3—C4—S1119.7 (5)C12—C11—H11120.0
C5—C4—S1120.6 (5)C10—C11—H11120.0
C4—C5—C6120.0 (6)C13—C12—C11121.2 (6)
C4—C5—H5120.0C13—C12—H12119.4
C6—C5—H5120.0C11—C12—H12119.4
C1—C6—C5119.9 (6)C12—C13—C14119.1 (7)
C1—C6—H6120.1C12—C13—H13120.5
C5—C6—H6120.1C14—C13—H13120.5
O1—C7—H7A109.5C13—C14—C15120.5 (7)
O1—C7—H7B109.5C13—C14—H14119.8
H7A—C7—H7B109.5C15—C14—H14119.8
O1—C7—H7C109.5C10—C15—C14120.4 (6)
H7A—C7—H7C109.5C10—C15—H15119.8
H7B—C7—H7C109.5C14—C15—H15119.8
O1—C8—C9108.6 (5)
C6—C1—C2—C30.8 (9)O1—C8—C9—O219.3 (7)
Cl1—C1—C2—C3179.3 (5)S1—C8—C9—O2−105.1 (5)
C1—C2—C3—C4−1.2 (9)O1—C8—C9—C10−160.4 (5)
C2—C3—C4—C50.9 (9)S1—C8—C9—C1075.2 (6)
C2—C3—C4—S1−177.2 (5)O2—C9—C10—C15177.7 (6)
C8—S1—C4—C3−101.5 (5)C8—C9—C10—C15−2.5 (8)
C8—S1—C4—C580.5 (5)O2—C9—C10—C11−2.9 (8)
C3—C4—C5—C6−0.2 (8)C8—C9—C10—C11176.9 (5)
S1—C4—C5—C6177.9 (5)C15—C10—C11—C120.0 (9)
C2—C1—C6—C50.0 (9)C9—C10—C11—C12−179.4 (5)
Cl1—C1—C6—C5−178.5 (5)C10—C11—C12—C13−1.0 (9)
C4—C5—C6—C1−0.3 (9)C11—C12—C13—C141.0 (10)
C7—O1—C8—C9163.9 (5)C12—C13—C14—C150.1 (10)
C7—O1—C8—S1−75.3 (6)C11—C10—C15—C141.0 (10)
C4—S1—C8—O1−63.7 (4)C9—C10—C15—C14−179.6 (5)
C4—S1—C8—C957.3 (5)C13—C14—C15—C10−1.1 (10)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H7A···O2i0.962.533.297 (9)137
C8—H8···O2i0.982.423.305 (8)150
  8 in total

1.  NCIPLOT: a program for plotting non-covalent interaction regions.

Authors:  Julia Contreras-García; Erin R Johnson; Shahar Keinan; Robin Chaudret; Jean-Philip Piquemal; David N Beratan; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Towards quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions with Hirshfeld surfaces.

Authors:  Joshua J McKinnon; Dylan Jayatilaka; Mark A Spackman
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Conformational analysis of some N,N-diethyl-2-[(4'-substituted) phenylthio] acetamides.

Authors:  Elisângela Vinhato; Paulo R Olivato; Julio Zukerman-Schpector; Maurizio Dal Colle
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 4.098

4.  Conformational study of some 4'-substituted 2-(phenylselanyl)-2-(ethylsulfanyl)-acetophenones.

Authors:  Carlos R Cerqueira; Paulo R Olivato; Maurizio Dal Colle
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 4.098

5.  Revealing noncovalent interactions.

Authors:  Erin R Johnson; Shahar Keinan; Paula Mori-Sánchez; Julia Contreras-García; Aron J Cohen; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  1-Methyl-3-phenyl-sulfonyl-2-piperidone.

Authors:  Julio Zukerman-Schpector; Paulo R Olivato; Carlos R Cerqueira; Elisângela Vinhato; Edward R T Tiekink
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-04-16

7.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

8.  Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement.

Authors:  Simon Parsons; Howard D Flack; Trixie Wagner
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2013-05-17
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Conformationally Biased Ketones React Diastereoselectively with Allylmagnesium Halides.

Authors:  Nicole D Bartolo; Krystyna M Demkiw; Jacquelyne A Read; Elizabeth M Valentín; Yingying Yang; Alexandra M Dillon; Chunhua T Hu; Michael D Ward; K A Woerpel
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.198

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.