Literature DB >> 29850066

3-Methyl-1-{(E)-[1-(4-methyl-pyridin-2-yl)ethyl-idene]amino}-thio-urea: crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis.

Lee Chin Lai1, Che Nursarah Binti Che Abdul Rahman1, M Ibrahim M Tahir1, Thahira B S A Ravoof1, Mukesh M Jotani2, Edward R T Tiekink3.   

Abstract

The title disubstituted thio-urea derivative, C10H14N4S, features an almost planar imine (E configuration, C3N) core flanked by thio-urea (CN2S) and methyl-pyridyl (C5N) residues (each plane has a r.m.s. deviation of the respective fitted atoms of 0.0066 Å). The dihedral angles between the core and the thio-urea and pyridyl residues are 20.25 (8) and 7.60 (9)°, respectively, indicating twists in the mol-ecule; the dihedral angle between the outer planes is 13.62 (7)°. There is an anti-disposition of the amine-N-H atoms which allows for the formation of an intra-molecular amine-N-H⋯N(imine) hydrogen bond that closes an S(5) loop. In the crystal, amine-N-H⋯N(pyrid-yl) hydrogen bonds lead to zigzag (glide symmetry) supra-molecular chains along the c-axis direction. These are connected into a supra-molecular layer propagating in the bc plane by thio-amide-N-H⋯S(thione) hydrogen bonds via eight-membered thio-amide {⋯HNCS}2 synthons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surface analysis; crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; thio­urea derivative

Year:  2018        PMID: 29850066      PMCID: PMC5956349          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018001305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Thio­semicarbazones (TSCs) are thio­urea derivatives that form versatile ligands containing mixed hard–soft, nitro­gen–sulfur donor atoms. TSC and its derivatives have attracted considerable attention due to their promising biological applications, especially in the realm of anti-tumour (Hussein et al., 2015 ▸), anti-viral (Easmon et al., 1992 ▸), anti-malarial (Kumar et al., 2014 ▸), anti-fungal (Lobana et al., 2017 ▸), anti-bacterial (Khan & Asiri, 2018 ▸) and anti-parasitic (Njogu & Chibale, 2013 ▸) activities. Their biological potential has been found to be enhanced by the addition of alkyl groups at the terminal N-position (Liberta and West, 1992 ▸). In fact, a thio­semi­carbazone drug, methisazone (N-methyl­isatin β-thio­semi­carbazone) was reported as an anti-viral agent by McNeill in 1972 (McNeill, 1972 ▸) and field trials for methisazone as a prophylactic agent against smallpox were carried out in West Pakistan between 1964 and 1970 (Heiner et al., 1971 ▸). More recently, phase I and phase II clinical trials were conducted for triapine (3-amino­pyridine­carbaldehyde thio­semicarbazone) in untreated patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer where triapine showed an inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase and thus enhanced the radiochemosensitivity by prolonging DNA repair time (Kunos & Sherertz, 2014 ▸). With this inter­est and as a part of on-going investigations on a series of thio­semi­carbazone Schiff bases and their transition metal complexes, the title compound, namely the N-methyl thio­semicarbazone derived from 2-acetyl-4-methyl pyridine, (I), was synthesized. Herein, its crystal and mol­ecular structures along with an analysis of its Hirshfeld surface and fingerprint plots are reported.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of (I), Fig. 1 ▸, comprises three distinct almost planar residues, namely the thio­urea (C1,N1,N2,S1), central imine (C3,C4,C5,N3) and methyl­pyridyl (N4,C5–C10) residues, coincidentally each with the r.m.s. deviation of the respective fitted atoms being 0.0066 Å. Twists in the mol­ecule are apparent about the N2—N3 and C3—C5 bonds as seen in the values of the C1—N2—N3—C3 and C4—C3—C5—C9 torsion angles of −167.44 (13) and 171.34 (13)°, respectively. This is reflected in the dihedral angles between the mean planes through the central and each of the thio­urea and methyl­pyridyl residues of 20.25 (8) and 7.60 (9)°, respectively; the dihedral angle between the outer planes is 13.62 (7)°. The configuration about the C3=N3 imine bond [1.2872 (19) Å] is E. The mol­ecule in (I) features an anti-disposition of the amine-NH atoms, which facilitates the formation of an intra­molecular amine-N1—H⋯N3(imine) hydrogen bond to close an S(5) loop, Table 1 ▸. The methyl groups lie to opposite sides of the mol­ecule and can also be described as being anti to one another.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of (I) showing the atom-labelling scheme and displacement ellipsoids at the 70% probability level.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg1 is the centroid of the (N4,C5–C9) ring.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1N⋯N30.88 (2)2.23 (2)2.6148 (18)106 (1)
N1—H1N⋯N4i 0.88 (2)2.33 (2)3.0714 (18)142 (1)
N2—H2N⋯S1ii 0.87 (1)2.55 (1)3.3955 (13)168 (2)
C10—H10ACg1i 0.982.893.7546 (18)147

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Supra­molecular features

The most prominent feature of the mol­ecular packing is the formation of eight-membered thio­amide {⋯HNCS}2 synthons owing to the formation of thio­amide-N2—H⋯S1(thione) hydrogen bonds between centrosymmetrically related mol­ecules, Table 1 ▸. These serve to link zigzag (glide symmetry) supra­molecular chains, along the c-axis direction and sustained by amine-N1—H⋯N4(pyrid­yl) hydrogen bonds, into a supra­molecular layer propagating in the bc plane, Fig. 2 ▸ a. Additional stabilization of the layers is afforded by methyl-C—H⋯π(pyrid­yl) inter­actions, Table 1 ▸. Layers stack along the a axis without directional inter­actions between them, Fig. 2 ▸ b.
Figure 2

Mol­ecular packing in (I): (a) a view of the supra­molecular layer propagating normal to the a-axis direction sustained by thio­amide-N—H⋯S(thione) and amine-N—H⋯N(pyrid­yl) hydrogen bonds shown as orange and blue dashed lines, respectively. Non-participating hydrogen atoms have been omitted for reasons of clarity, and (b) a view of the unit-cell contents shown in projection down the c axis. One layer is highlighted in space-filling mode to emphasize the jagged topology.

Analysis of the Hirshfeld surfaces

The Hirshfeld surface calculations were performed according to recent work on a related organic mol­ecule (Tan et al., 2017 ▸) and serve to provide more detailed information on the influence of inter­molecular inter­actions in the crystal. The dominant N—H⋯S and N—H⋯N hydrogen-bonding interactions in the structure of (I) are viewed as bright-red spots near the respective donor and acceptor atoms on the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over d norm shown in Fig. 3 ▸. The diminutive red spots near the pyridyl-N4 and -H9 atoms indicate the presence of inter­molecular C—H⋯N inter­actions. In addition to the above, the crystal also features comparatively weak inter­molecular C—H⋯S inter­actions and short inter­atomic C⋯S/S⋯C contacts, Table 2 ▸, viewed as faint-red spots in Fig. 3 ▸. The Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over electrostatic potential shown in Fig. 4 ▸ represent the donors and acceptors of inter­molecular inter­actions with blue and red regions corresponding to positive and negative electrostatic potentials, respectively.
Figure 3

Two views of the Hirshfeld surface mapped over d norm for (I) in the range −0.110 to +1.348 au, highlighting N—H⋯N and N—H⋯S hydrogen bonds through yellow dashed lines and short inter­atomic C⋯S/S⋯C contacts through black dashed lines.

Table 2

Summary of short inter­atomic contacts (Å) in (I)

ContactDistanceSymmetry operation
H2A⋯H4B 2.232 − x, − + y,  − z
H9⋯N42.54 x,  − y, − + z
H7⋯S12.83−1 + x,  − y, − + z
C3⋯H4A 2.84 x,  − y, − + z
C4⋯S13.4545 (15)2 − x, 1 − y, 2 − z
Figure 4

Two views of the Hirshfeld surface mapped over the electrostatic potential for (I) in the range −0.103 to +0.104 au. The red and blue regions represent negative and positive electrostatic potentials, respectively.

The overall two-dimensional fingerprint plot for (I), showing the key inter­atomic contacts, is illustrated in Fig. 5 ▸ a; fingerprint plots delineated (McKinnon et al., 2007 ▸) into H⋯H, C⋯H/H⋯C, S⋯H/H⋯S and N⋯H/H⋯N contacts are shown in Fig. 5 ▸ b–e. The percentage contributions from the different inter­atomic contacts to the Hirshfeld surface are summarized in Table 3 ▸. A spike at d e + d i ∼2.2 Å with the label ‘a’ in the middle of the plot and those around it at d e + d i ∼2.2 and 2.4 Å, labelled with ‘b′ and ‘c′, in the plot of Fig. 5 ▸ a indicate the presence of the short inter­atomic H2A⋯H4B contact (Table 2 ▸) and inter­molecular N—H⋯N and N—H⋯S hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸), respectively. The significant contribution of 16.7% from C⋯H/H⋯C contacts to the Hirshfeld surface of (I) is the result of the short C3⋯H4A contact (Table 2 ▸) and C—H⋯π inter­action (Table 1 ▸), viewed as a pair of very short peaks at d e + d i ∼2.8 Å and the parabolic distribution of points around d e + d i ∼2.9 Å, respectively. The points related to the most prominent inter­layer contact, i.e. S1⋯H7 (Table 2 ▸), are merged within the plot delineated into S⋯H/H⋯S contacts (Fig. 5 ▸ d) due to the presence of N—H⋯S hydrogen bonds. The contribution of 0.6% from C⋯S/S⋯C contacts to the Hirshfeld surfaces of (I) indicate the presence of the short C4⋯S1 contact listed in Table 2 ▸. The other inter­atomic contacts summarized in Table 3 ▸ having large inter­atomic separations have a negligible effect on the packing.
Figure 5

(a) The full two-dimensional fingerprint plot for (I) and fingerprint plots delineated into (b) H⋯H, (c) C⋯H/H⋯C, (d) S⋯H/H⋯S and (e) N⋯H/H⋯N contacts.

Table 3

Relative percentage contributions of close contacts to the Hirshfeld surface of (I)

H⋯H50.4
C⋯H/H⋯C16.7
S⋯H/H⋯S16.5
N⋯H/H⋯N14.9
C⋯C0.7
C⋯S/S⋯C0.6
S⋯N/N⋯S0.2

Database survey

Reflecting the inter­est in this class of compounds, there are no fewer than 16 structures related to (I) included in the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.38; Groom et al., 2016 ▸), i.e. that are neutral and feature N1-bound alkyl or aryl group and a C3-bound pyridyl ring; the C4-bound methyl group is common to all structures. The most closely related structure to (I), i.e. with an unsubstituted 2-pyridyl ring at the C3-position, has been described three times, being originally reported in 1999 (Bermejo et al., 1999 ▸). Most structures feature N1-bound aryl rings, and all feature an anti-disposition of the N—H groups.

Synthesis and crystallization

All chemicals were of analytical grade and were used without any further purification. 2-Acetyl-4-methyl pyridine (0.68 g, 0.005 mol) in absolute ethanol (40 ml) was dissolved and added to 4-methyl-3-thio­semicarbazide (0.52 g, 0.005 mol) dissolved in absolute ethanol (40 ml). The mixture was then heated in a water bath for 10 mins with constant and vigorous stirring until the volume reduced to 30 ml. The product that formed was filtered off, washed with cold ethanol and dried in a desiccator over anhydrous silica gel. Brown platy crystals suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained by recrystallization with absolute ethanol as solvent. M.pt: 468.8–470.1 K. IR (cm−1): 3274 ν(N—H), 1589 ν(C=N), 1118 ν(N—N), 1045 ν(C=S). MS (m/z): 222.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 4 ▸. The carbon-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.95–0.98 Å) and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with U iso(H) set to 1.2–1.5U eq(C). The nitro­gen-bound H atoms were located in a difference-Fourier map but were refined with a distance restraint of N—H = 0.88±0.01 Å, and with U iso(H) set to 1.2U eq(N).
Table 4

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC10H14N4S
M r 222.31
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)8.8108 (3), 14.9044 (4), 9.3583 (3)
β (°)113.391 (4)
V3)1127.93 (7)
Z 4
Radiation typeCu Kα
μ (mm−1)2.33
Crystal size (mm)0.15 × 0.13 × 0.03
 
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku Oxford Diffraction Gemini E
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)
T min, T max 0.852, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections21767, 2184, 1995
R int 0.034
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.614
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.035, 0.097, 1.02
No. of reflections2184
No. of parameters145
No. of restraints2
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.41, −0.23

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▸), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018001305/hb7729sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018001305/hb7729Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1818317 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H14N4SF(000) = 472
Mr = 222.31Dx = 1.309 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å
a = 8.8108 (3) ÅCell parameters from 9894 reflections
b = 14.9044 (4) Åθ = 3.0–71.2°
c = 9.3583 (3) ŵ = 2.33 mm1
β = 113.391 (4)°T = 100 K
V = 1127.93 (7) Å3Plate, brown
Z = 40.15 × 0.13 × 0.03 mm
Rigaku Oxford Diffraction Gemini E diffractometer2184 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance X-ray source1995 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromatorRint = 0.034
Detector resolution: 16.1952 pixels mm-1θmax = 71.3°, θmin = 5.5°
ω scanh = −10→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)k = −18→17
Tmin = 0.852, Tmax = 1.000l = −11→11
21767 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.097w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.063P)2 + 0.4965P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.02(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2184 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.41 e Å3
145 parametersΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
2 restraints
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S11.01197 (4)0.43326 (2)0.80392 (4)0.01660 (14)
N10.78625 (16)0.52040 (9)0.56429 (14)0.0167 (3)
H1N0.728 (2)0.5689 (9)0.527 (2)0.020*
N20.85960 (15)0.58621 (8)0.80403 (14)0.0151 (3)
H2N0.908 (2)0.5811 (12)0.9041 (11)0.018*
N30.73527 (15)0.64746 (8)0.73280 (14)0.0151 (3)
N40.57917 (15)0.85680 (9)0.79338 (14)0.0169 (3)
C10.87633 (17)0.51659 (10)0.71665 (16)0.0142 (3)
C20.7888 (2)0.45156 (11)0.45507 (18)0.0206 (3)
H2A0.90180.42890.48600.031*
H2B0.75080.47720.35020.031*
H2C0.71550.40220.45540.031*
C30.73564 (17)0.72169 (10)0.80323 (16)0.0137 (3)
C40.86453 (18)0.75205 (10)0.95558 (17)0.0176 (3)
H4A0.82630.74031.03890.026*
H4B0.88410.81650.95080.026*
H4C0.96760.71920.97680.026*
C50.59425 (17)0.78267 (10)0.71764 (16)0.0144 (3)
C60.45183 (19)0.91141 (11)0.71570 (19)0.0201 (3)
H60.43870.96380.76750.024*
C70.33818 (18)0.89648 (11)0.56488 (18)0.0198 (3)
H70.25150.93810.51540.024*
C80.35303 (17)0.81950 (10)0.48712 (16)0.0168 (3)
C90.48424 (17)0.76211 (10)0.56638 (16)0.0153 (3)
H90.49890.70890.51750.018*
C100.23240 (19)0.79716 (11)0.32435 (18)0.0205 (3)
H10A0.29290.78740.25760.031*
H10B0.15460.84700.28300.031*
H10C0.17140.74260.32670.031*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0203 (2)0.0138 (2)0.0143 (2)0.00414 (13)0.00545 (15)0.00082 (13)
N10.0217 (6)0.0131 (6)0.0134 (6)0.0032 (5)0.0050 (5)0.0000 (5)
N20.0174 (6)0.0140 (6)0.0111 (6)0.0029 (5)0.0028 (5)0.0006 (5)
N30.0158 (6)0.0148 (6)0.0144 (6)0.0029 (5)0.0057 (5)0.0017 (5)
N40.0178 (6)0.0160 (7)0.0171 (6)0.0018 (5)0.0072 (5)−0.0005 (5)
C10.0152 (7)0.0125 (7)0.0161 (7)−0.0017 (5)0.0073 (5)0.0008 (5)
C20.0278 (8)0.0167 (8)0.0158 (7)0.0015 (6)0.0072 (6)−0.0027 (6)
C30.0158 (7)0.0143 (7)0.0126 (7)0.0000 (5)0.0073 (5)0.0008 (5)
C40.0193 (7)0.0141 (7)0.0166 (7)0.0020 (6)0.0042 (6)−0.0023 (6)
C50.0161 (7)0.0134 (7)0.0156 (7)−0.0002 (5)0.0082 (6)0.0013 (5)
C60.0216 (7)0.0157 (8)0.0228 (8)0.0035 (6)0.0086 (6)−0.0022 (6)
C70.0174 (7)0.0185 (8)0.0223 (8)0.0043 (6)0.0067 (6)0.0022 (6)
C80.0162 (7)0.0189 (8)0.0158 (7)0.0000 (6)0.0069 (6)0.0033 (6)
C90.0182 (7)0.0143 (7)0.0149 (7)0.0005 (6)0.0081 (6)0.0000 (5)
C100.0204 (7)0.0221 (8)0.0166 (7)0.0028 (6)0.0050 (6)0.0028 (6)
S1—C11.6920 (15)C4—H4A0.9800
N1—C11.3295 (18)C4—H4B0.9800
N1—C21.4547 (19)C4—H4C0.9800
N1—H1N0.873 (9)C5—C91.396 (2)
N2—C11.3649 (19)C6—C71.386 (2)
N2—N31.3776 (17)C6—H60.9500
N2—H2N0.864 (9)C7—C81.392 (2)
N3—C31.2872 (19)C7—H70.9500
N4—C51.3474 (19)C8—C91.392 (2)
N4—C61.342 (2)C8—C101.508 (2)
C2—H2A0.9800C9—H90.9500
C2—H2B0.9800C10—H10A0.9800
C2—H2C0.9800C10—H10B0.9800
C3—C51.4923 (19)C10—H10C0.9800
C3—C41.4971 (19)
C1—N1—C2123.66 (13)H4A—C4—H4C109.5
C1—N1—H1N117.9 (13)H4B—C4—H4C109.5
C2—N1—H1N118.3 (13)N4—C5—C9122.66 (13)
C1—N2—N3117.92 (12)N4—C5—C3116.91 (12)
C1—N2—H2N117.3 (12)C9—C5—C3120.42 (13)
N3—N2—H2N122.4 (12)N4—C6—C7124.37 (14)
C3—N3—N2118.81 (12)N4—C6—H6117.8
C5—N4—C6116.62 (12)C7—C6—H6117.8
N1—C1—N2116.71 (13)C6—C7—C8118.98 (14)
N1—C1—S1123.75 (11)C6—C7—H7120.5
N2—C1—S1119.50 (11)C8—C7—H7120.5
N1—C2—H2A109.5C7—C8—C9117.28 (13)
N1—C2—H2B109.5C7—C8—C10122.34 (14)
H2A—C2—H2B109.5C9—C8—C10120.38 (14)
N1—C2—H2C109.5C8—C9—C5120.08 (14)
H2A—C2—H2C109.5C8—C9—H9120.0
H2B—C2—H2C109.5C5—C9—H9120.0
N3—C3—C5114.63 (12)C8—C10—H10A109.5
N3—C3—C4126.45 (13)C8—C10—H10B109.5
C5—C3—C4118.89 (12)H10A—C10—H10B109.5
C3—C4—H4A109.5C8—C10—H10C109.5
C3—C4—H4B109.5H10A—C10—H10C109.5
H4A—C4—H4B109.5H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C3—C4—H4C109.5
C1—N2—N3—C3−167.44 (13)N3—C3—C5—C9−6.6 (2)
C2—N1—C1—N2−179.61 (13)C4—C3—C5—C9171.34 (13)
C2—N1—C1—S12.5 (2)C5—N4—C6—C7−0.5 (2)
N3—N2—C1—N19.20 (19)N4—C6—C7—C81.0 (2)
N3—N2—C1—S1−172.80 (10)C6—C7—C8—C9−0.8 (2)
N2—N3—C3—C5−178.98 (11)C6—C7—C8—C10178.57 (15)
N2—N3—C3—C43.2 (2)C7—C8—C9—C50.1 (2)
C6—N4—C5—C9−0.3 (2)C10—C8—C9—C5−179.24 (13)
C6—N4—C5—C3179.94 (13)N4—C5—C9—C80.4 (2)
N3—C3—C5—N4173.16 (12)C3—C5—C9—C8−179.77 (13)
C4—C3—C5—N4−8.85 (19)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···N30.88 (2)2.23 (2)2.6148 (18)106 (1)
N1—H1N···N4i0.88 (2)2.33 (2)3.0714 (18)142 (1)
N2—H2N···S1ii0.87 (1)2.55 (1)3.3955 (13)168 (2)
C10—H10A···Cg1i0.982.893.7546 (18)147
  12 in total

1.  Novel thiosemicarbazones derived from formyl- and acyldiazines: synthesis, effects on cell proliferation, and synergism with antiviral agents.

Authors:  J Easmon; G Heinisch; W Holzer; B Rosenwirth
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1992-08-21       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Towards quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions with Hirshfeld surfaces.

Authors:  Joshua J McKinnon; Dylan Jayatilaka; Mark A Spackman
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Mononuclear dioxomolybdenum(VI) thiosemicarbazonato complexes: Synthesis, characterization, structural illustration, in vitro DNA binding, cleavage, and antitumor properties.

Authors:  Mouayed A Hussein; Teoh S Guan; Rosenani A Haque; Mohamed B Khadeer Ahamed; Amin M S Abdul Majid
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.098

4.  Highly potent anti-proliferative effects of a gallium(III) complex with 7-chloroquinoline thiosemicarbazone as a ligand: synthesis, cytotoxic and antimalarial evaluation.

Authors:  Kewal Kumar; Sarah Schniper; Antonio González-Sarrías; Alvin A Holder; Natalie Sanders; David Sullivan; William L Jarrett; Krystyn Davis; Fengwei Bai; Navindra P Seeram; Vipan Kumar
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 5.  Recent developments in rationally designed multitarget antiprotozoan agents.

Authors:  P M Njogu; K Chibale
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Multi-step synthesis, spectroscopic studies of biological active steroidal thiosemicarbazones and their palladium (II) complex as macromolecules.

Authors:  Salman A Khan; Abdullah M Asiri
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 6.953

7.  Effect of methisazone and other drugs on mouse hemophoietic colony formation in vitro.

Authors:  T A McNeill
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Antifungal and antitumor activity of heterocyclic thiosemicarbazones and their metal complexes: current status.

Authors:  A E Liberta; D X West
Journal:  Biometals       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.949

9.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.