| Literature DB >> 29849950 |
Wojciech Wojtowicz1, Angelika Chachaj2, Andrzej Olczak3, Adam Ząbek1, Elżbieta Piątkowska4, Justyna Rybka5, Aleksandra Butrym6,7, Monika Biedroń5, Grzegorz Mazur6, Tomasz Wróbel5, Andrzej Szuba2, Piotr Młynarz1.
Abstract
Haematological malignancies are a frequently diagnosed group of neoplasms and a significant cause of cancer deaths. The successful treatment of these diseases relies on early and accurate detection. Specific small molecular compounds released by malignant cells and the simultaneous response by the organism towards the pathological state may serve as diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers or as a tool with relevance for cancer therapy management. To identify the most important metabolites required for differentiation, an 1H NMR metabolomics approach was applied to selected haematological malignancies. This study utilized 116 methanol serum extract samples from AML (n= 38), nHL (n= 26), CLL (n= 21) and HC (n= 31). Multivariate and univariate data analyses were performed to identify the most abundant changes among the studied groups. Complex and detailed VIP-PLS-DA models were calculated to highlight possible changes in terms of biochemical pathways and discrimination ability. Chemometric model prediction properties were validated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and statistical analysis. Two sets of eight important metabolites in HC/AML/CLL/nHL comparisons and five in AML/CLL/nHL comparisons were selected to form complex models to represent the most significant changes that occurred.Entities:
Keywords: AML; CLL; haematological malignancies; metabolomics; nHL
Year: 2018 PMID: 29849950 PMCID: PMC5966245 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Representative 1H NMR spectrum with marked resonance signals
1 - 2-Hydroxyisovalerate, 2 - 2-Hydroxybutyrate, 3 - Isovalerate, 4 - Isoleucine, 5 - 2-Oxoisocaproate, 6 - Alloisoleucine, 7 - Leucine, 8 - Valine, 9 - Isobutyrate, 10 - 2-Methylglutarate, 11 - 3-Methyl-2-oxovalerate, 12 - 3-Hydroxybutyrate, 13 - Lactate, 14 - 2-Hydroxyisobutyrate, 15 - Alanine, 17 - Lysine, 18 - Acetate, 19 - Proline, 20 - Glutamine, 21 - Succinate, 22 - Glutamate, 23 - Citrate, 24 - Methionine, 25 - Dimethylamine, 26 - Sarcosine, 27 - N,N-Dimethylglycine, 28 - Creatine, 29 - Creatinine, 30- Ornithine, 31 - Dimethyl sulfone, 32 - Choline, 33 - O-Phosphocholine, 34 - sn-Glycero-3-phosphocholine, 35 - Glucose, 36 - Betaine, 37 - Taurine, 38 - Methanol, 39 - Glycine, 40 - Threonine, 41 - Glycerol, 42 - Serine, 43 - Urea, 44 - Tyrosine, 45 - Histidine, 46 - Tryptophan, 47 - Phenylalanine, 48 - Hypoxanthine, 49 - Oxypurinol, and 50 - Formate.
The VIP-PLS-DA model parameters for each comparison based on serum samples
| Comparison | Latent variables | R2X(cum) | R2Y(cum) | Q2(cum) | CV-ANOVA | AUC training | AUC test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0.370 | 0.267 | 0.223 | 3.96E-12 | - | - | |
| 2 | 0.512 | 0.864 | 0.744 | 3.18E-05 | 1.000 | 0.975 | |
| 2 | 0.472 | 0.662 | 0.248 | 1.05E-01 | 0.852 | 0.588 | |
| 2 | 0.614 | 0.622 | 0.37 | 1.08E-02 | 0.898 | 0.853 | |
| 2 | 0.366 | 0.394 | 0.315 | 4.98E-11 | - | - | |
| 2 | 0.530 | 0.692 | 0.575 | 7.74E-04 | 0.929 | 0.837 | |
| 2 | 0.459 | 0.719 | 0.383 | 6.20E-02 | 0.879 | 0.932 | |
| 2 | 0.582 | 0.469 | 0.287 | 7.84E-02 | 0.837 | 0.655 |
Figure 2The VIP-PLS-DA models for all the groups used in the study
For a better representation, only Hotelling's T2 range is shown. (A) The PLS-DA general model with all the sample groups. (B) Loading plot of the VIP-PLS-DA model for all groups and samples used in the study. Red pentagon – AML; Orange circle – HC; Green triangle – nHL and Blue box – CLL. The inserted reduced figure serves to show outliers related to the variability in the studied groups.
Figure 3The VIP-PLS-DA models plots with the training (no fill) and test (fill) set samples and ROC curves
The dark blue curve represents the training set and the red curve represents the test set. (A) - HC vs AML; (B) - HC vs nHL, (C) - HC vs CLL. Red pentagon – AML; Orange circle – HC; Green triangle – nHL and Blue box – CLL.
Figure 6The VIP-PLS-DA model plots with the training (no fill) and test (fill) set samples and ROC curves
The dark blue curve represents the training set and the red curve represents the test set. (A) - AML vs CLL; (B) - AML vs nHL, (C) - nHL vs CLL. Red pentagon – AML; Green triangle – nHL and Blue box – CLL.
Figure 4Boxplots of the statistically important metabolites (p<0.05) between HC and the haematological cancers
Braces mark the comparisons where the selected metabolites are statistically important. Whiskers - non-outlier min-max range; * - extreme; ° - outlier; bar - median; box - Q1-Q3 interquartile range; yellow – HC; red – AML; blue - CLL; and green - nHL.
Figure 5The VIP-PLS-DA models for all the groups used in study
For a better representation, only Hotelling's T2 range is shown. (A) The VIP-PLS-DA model with the haematological malignancy groups. (B) VIP-PLS-DA loading plot for the haematological malignancy groups. Red pentagon – AML; Green triangle – nHL and Blue box – CLL. The inserted reduced figure serves to show outliers related to the variability in the studied groups.
Figure 7Boxplots for the identified statistically important metabolites (p<0.05) between the haematological cancer groups
Braces show that the comparisons with the selected metabolites are statistically important. Whiskers - non-outlier min-max range; * - extreme; ° - outlier; bar - median; box - Q1-Q3 interquartile range;