Literature DB >> 29849353

Aortic Pseudo-dissection.

Karl Huesgen1, Sarah Gul1, Candice Norman1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29849353      PMCID: PMC5965246          DOI: 10.5811/cpcem.2017.9.35658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med        ISSN: 2474-252X


× No keyword cloud information.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 21-year-old female with a past medical history significant for asthma and oral contraceptive use presented complaining of shortness of breath and wheezing. Symptoms started after contact with a dog. She came to the emergency department (ED) after home albuterol treatments failed to provide relief. Initial vital signs included a blood pressure of 145/49mmHg, pulse rate 127 beats/minute, respirations 32 breaths/minute, temperature 37.1°C (98.8°F), and oxygen saturation of 87% on room air. On auscultation, lung fields demonstrated bilateral wheezing and the expiratory phase was prolonged. She also had retractions and endorsed chest tightness. ED workup included an elevated D-dimer, and subsequent computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography indicated ascending aortic dissection instead (Image).
Image

Motion artifact suggesting luminal flap of aortic dissection (arrow).

DIAGNOSIS

Aortic pseudo-dissection artifact

Emergent preoperative transesophageal echocardiography disproved presence of intimal flap and dissection, so operative repair was aborted. The patient’s tachycardia after multiple beta agonist treatments produced a motion artifact concerning for aortic root dissection. Although CT imaging is highly sensitive and specific for aortic dissections, there is a potential for false-positive ascending dissections (Stanford type A). 1, 2 Such artifacts are frequently seen in the thoracic aorta due to its close proximity to the heart, 3 and tachycardia correlates significantly with motion defects on CT. 4 This problem can be overcome by use of electrocardiography-synchronized (ECG-gated) CT instead. 5, 6 The patient’s asthma exacerbation was treated as an inpatient and she was eventually discharged home. This case illustrates the importance of taking the clinical history along with the patient’s presentation into account when making a diagnosis. What do we already know about this clinical entity? An aortic dissection occurs when blood enters the medial layer of the aortic wall through a tear in the intima. An aortic pseudo-dissection on the other hand occurs due to aortic pulsation motion artifact on imaging. What is the major impact of the image(s?) An inaccurate diagnosis of an aortic dissection might result in a patient undergoing unnecessary emergent surgery. How might this improve emergency medicine practice? There is a risk for false-positive computed tomography (CT) results with ascending dissections. Using electrocardiography-gated CT is useful and may prevent unnecessary surgery. It is also important to take the patient’s history and presentation into account and not rely on imaging alone when making a final diagnosis.
  6 in total

1.  Thoracic aorta: motion artifact reduction with retrospective and prospective electrocardiography-assisted multi-detector row CT.

Authors:  Justus E Roos; Jürgen K Willmann; Dominik Weishaupt; Mario Lachat; Borut Marincek; Paul R Hilfiker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Thoracic aorta at multi-detector row CT: motion artifact with various reconstruction windows.

Authors:  Gareth J Morgan-Hughes; Patrick E Owens; Andrew J Marshall; Carl A Roobottom
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-06-20       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Pitfalls in the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection at CT angiography.

Authors:  P Batra; B Bigoni; J Manning; D R Aberle; K Brown; E Hart; J Goldin
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Prevalence and factors associated with false positive suspicion of acute aortic syndrome: experience in a patient population transferred to a specialized aortic treatment center.

Authors:  Chad E Raymond; Bhuvnesh Aggarwal; Paul Schoenhagen; Damon M Kralovic; Kristopher Kormos; David Holloway; Venu Menon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-12

5.  Aortic motion: a potential pitfall in CT imaging of dissection in the ascending aorta.

Authors:  O Duvernoy; R Coulden; C Ytterberg
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Effects of heart rate on motion artifacts of the aorta on non-ECG-assisted 0.5-sec thoracic MDCT.

Authors:  Sheung-Fat Ko; Ming-Jeng Hsieh; Min-Chi Chen; Shu-Hang Ng; Fu-Min Fang; Chung-Cheng Huang; Yung-Liang Wan; Tze-Yu Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.959

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.