| Literature DB >> 29848952 |
Juhani Virtanen1, Sanni Somppi2, Heini Törnqvist3, Vala Jeyhani4, Patrique Fiedler5, Yulia Gizatdinova6, Päivi Majaranta7, Heli Väätäjä8, Anna Valldeoriola Cardó9, Jukka Lekkala10, Sampo Tuukkanen11, Veikko Surakka12, Outi Vainio13, Antti Vehkaoja14.
Abstract
The functionality of three dry electrocardiogram electrode constructions was evaluated by measuring canine heart rate during four different behaviors: Standing, sitting, lying and walking. The testing was repeated (n = 9) in each of the 36 scenarios with three dogs. Two of the electrodes were constructed with spring-loaded test pins while the third electrode was a molded polymer electrode with Ag/AgCl coating. During the measurement, a specifically designed harness was used to attach the electrodes to the dogs. The performance of the electrodes was evaluated and compared in terms of heartbeat detection coverage. The effect on the respective heart rate coverage was studied by computing the heart rate coverage from the measured electrocardiogram signal using a pattern-matching algorithm to extract the R-peaks and further the beat-to-beat heart rate. The results show that the overall coverage ratios regarding the electrodes varied between 45⁻95% in four different activity modes. The lowest coverage was for lying and walking and the highest was for standing and sitting.Entities:
Keywords: dry electrode; heart rate canine
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29848952 PMCID: PMC6022057 DOI: 10.3390/s18061757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Electrodes: (a) The spring-loaded j75-1 test pins; (b) The Ag/AgCl-coated polymer electrode; (c) The electrode with gold-plated spring-loaded test pins.
Electrode housing configurations used in the study.
| Electrode | Peak | Polymer | Gold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contacts | j75-1 | Ag/AgCl-polymer | M1071 |
| Housing | Neoprene | Silicone rubber | Silicone rubber |
| Pins | 37 | 30 | 12 |
Figure 2The electrodes embedded into housings: (a) Peak electrode with PLA plate; (b) Ag/AgCl-coated polymer electrode before the second casting; (c) Gold electrode before the second casting; (d) Peak electrode in the neoprene fixture; (e) Ag/AgCl coated polymer electrode in the silicone rubber fixture; (f) Gold electrode in the silicone rubber fixture.
Figure 3(a) Mold for the silicone rubber housing casting; (b) Cast silicone rubber electrode housing.
Figure 4(a) The second version of the neoprene harness placed on the dog; (b) Polymer and gold electrodes attached to the neoprene harness.
Figure 5Illustration of the measured and filtered ECG data. Red rectangles denote the parts of the original signal that will be depicted in detail in Figure 6.
Figure 6Zoomed-in raw and filtered ECG data. The data comes from the original signals presented in Figure 5 that are marked by red rectangles.
Figure 7A typical scaled EGC template pattern that was used in pattern matching.
Figure 8Raw pattern match data and its respective RR interval graph. Red rectangles denote the parts of the original signal that will be depicted in detail in Figure 9.
Figure 9A zoomed-in representation of the scaled vector distance from the template pattern and the respective zoomed-in RR interval graph.
Average coverage ratios and their respective standard deviations of each electrode in all activity modes combined. The maximum and minimum values are highlighted in bold typeface.
| Activity | Stand | Sit | Lie | Walk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrode | Avg | Sd | Md | R | Avg | Sd | Md | R | Avg | Sd | Md | R | Avg | Sd | Md | R |
| Peak | 0.68 | 0.23 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.26 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 0.70 | 0.35 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 0.57 | 0.26 | 0.51 | 0.81 |
| Polymer | 0.74 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.34 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.61 | 0.32 | 0.58 | 0.90 | 0.17 | 0.44 | 0.62 | |||
| Gold | 0.93 | 0.13 | 0.53 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.49 | 0.24 | 0.53 | 0.91 | |||||
Average coverage ratios with different measurement scenarios regarding the different electrode design. The maximum and minimum values are highlighted in bold typeface.
| Dog 1 | 0.58 | 0.26 | 0.58 | 0.80 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.35 | 0.79 | 0.49 | 0.34 | 0.46 | 0.87 | |||
| Dog 2 | 0.72 | 0.24 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.74 | 0.33 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.62 | 0.33 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.81 | |
| Dog 3 | 0.63 | 0.31 | 0.56 | 0.89 | 0.71 | 0.19 | 0.72 | 0.49 | 0.19 | 0.57 | 0.15 | 0.40 | 0.44 | |||
| Dog 1 | 0.77 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 0.33 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.66 | 0.85 | 0.27 | 0.14 | 0.38 | |||
| Dog 2 | 0.63 | 0.33 | 0.72 | 0.92 | 0.80 | 0.32 | 0.91 | 0.37 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.77 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.30 | ||
| Dog 3 | 0.76 | 0.33 | 0.98 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.34 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.18 | 0.95 | 0.40 | 0.25 | ||||
| Dog 1 | 0.94 | 0.12 | 0.39 | 0.08 | 0.25 | 0.85 | 0.24 | 0.60 | 0.47 | 0.37 | ||||||
| Dog 2 | 0.83 | 0.25 | 0.94 | 0.77 | 0.92 | 0.09 | 0.95 | 0.24 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.31 | 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.32 |
| Dog 3 | 0.94 | 0.08 | 0.96 | 0.22 | 0.86 | 0.12 | 0.87 | 0.31 | 0.83 | 0.29 | 0.95 | 0.86 | ||||
Figure 10Combined heart rate coverage boxplots with observation points which represent a coverage ratio computed from a 60 s measurement case. The observations are marked with stars while the outliers are marked with red circles.
Figure 11Boxplots of coverage ratios in different configurations with the respective observation points included in the plots. The observations are marked with stars while the outliers are marked with red circles.
The computed p-values of Mann-Whitney test (n = 27) regarding the electrodes in different activity modes.
| Stand | Sit | Lie | Walk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak/Polymer | 0.510 | 0.117 | ||
| Peak/Gold | 0.897 | 0.418 | ||
| Polymer/Gold | 0.053 | 0.252 | 0.184 | 0.354 |