| Literature DB >> 29848351 |
Wen X Li1, Pei P Fu1,2, Dong Zhang1,2, Kellyanne Boyce3, Bing W Xi4, Hong Zou1, Ming Li1, Shan G Wu1, Gui T Wang5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After observing differences in the number of reproductive complexes per proglottid within the genus Ligula, the genus Digramma was erected. However, the validity of Digramma has been previously questioned due to a low variability in the cox1, nad1 and ITS rDNA sequences between the two genera. We undertook a study to greatly increase the amount of sequence data available for resolution of this question by sequencing and characterizing the complete mitogenomes of Digramma interrupta and Ligula intestinalis.Entities:
Keywords: Digramma; Diphyllobothriidea; Eucestoda; Ligula; Mitogenome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29848351 PMCID: PMC5975392 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-2910-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Circular map of the mitochondrial genome of Digramma interrupta and Ligula intestinalis. Protein-coding genes (12) are shown in red, tRNAs (22) in yellow, rRNAs (2) in green and non-coding regions in grey
Annotated mitochondrial genomes of Digramma interrupta and Ligula intestinalis
| Gene | Position | Size (bp) | Intergenic nucleotides | Codon | Identity (%) | Sequence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From | To | Start | Stop | |||||
| 1/1 | 643/643 | 643/643 | GTG/GTG | T/T | 91.29 | |||
|
| 644/644 | 710/710 | 67/67 | 100 | ||||
| GAP1 | 711/711 | 713/713 | 3/3 | 100 | gaa/gaa | |||
|
| 714/714 | 1820/1820 | 1107/1107 | ATG/ATG | TAA/TAA | 93.41 | ||
| GAP2 | 1821/1821 | 1821/1821 | 1/1 | 100 | c/c | |||
| 1822/1822 | 2082/2082 | 261/261 | ATG/ATG | TAA/TAA | 94.64 | |||
| 2043/2043 | 3293/3293 | 1251/1251 | -40/-40 | ATG/ATG | TAG/TAG | 91.37 | ||
|
| 3293/3293 | 3357/3357 | 65/65 | -1/-1 | 100 | |||
|
| 3353/3353 | 3419/3419 | 67/67 | -5/-5 | 97.01 | |||
|
| 3416/3416 | 3482/3482 | 67/67 | -4/-4 | 98.51 | |||
| GAP3 | 3483/3483 | 3485/3485 | 3/3 | 66.67 | gtt/att | |||
| 3486/3486 | 3995/3995 | 510/510 | ATG/ATG | TAA/TAA | 93.33 | |||
| GAP4 | 3996/3996 | 3997/3997 | 2/2 | 100 | tc/tc | |||
| 3998/3998 | 4876/4876 | 879/879 | ATG/ATG | TAG/TAG | 91.24 | |||
| GAP5 | 4877/4877 | 4877/4877 | 1/1 | 100 | t/t | |||
|
| 4878/4878 | 4941/4941 | 64/64 | 100 | ||||
| GAP6 | 4942/4942 | 4949/4949 | 8/8 | 87.5 | gtcttaag/gttttaag | |||
|
| 4950/4950 | 5010/5010 | 61/61 | 98.36 | ||||
| GAP7 | 5011/5011 | 5013/5013 | 3/3 | 100 | tgg/tgg | |||
|
| 5014/5014 | 5077/5077 | 64/64 | 87.5 | ||||
| 5078/5078 | 5968/5968 | 891/891 | ATG/ATG | TAG/TAG | 93.04 | |||
|
| 5968/5968 | 6033/6033 | 66/66 | -1/-1 | 96.97 | |||
| GAP8 | 6034/6034 | 6040/6040 | 7/7 | 100 | tatgggt/tatgggt | |||
|
| 6041/6041 | 6105/6105 | 65/65 | 95.38 | ||||
| GAP9 | 6106/6106 | 6112/6113 | 7/8 | 62.5 | cgcatta/tagtatta | |||
|
| 6113/6114 | 6177/6178 | 65/65 | 93.85 | ||||
| GAP10 | 6,178/6,179 | 6194/6195 | 17/17 | 82.35 | taaagaaggaaaggata/taaagaaggaaaaggtg | |||
|
| 6195/6196 | 6258/6259 | 64/64 | 98.44 | ||||
| GAP11 | 6259/6260 | 6261/6260 | 3/1 | 33.33 | aat/a | |||
| 6262/6261 | 6618/6617 | 357/357 | ATG/ATG | TAG/TAG | 94.96 | |||
|
| 6608/6607 | 6666/6665 | 59/59 | -11/-11 | 96.61 | |||
| GAP12 | 6667/6666 | 6668/6667 | 2/2 | 50 | tc/tt | |||
|
| 6669/6668 | 6731/6730 | 63/63 | 93.65 | ||||
| GAP13 | 6732/6731 | 6739/6738 | 8/8 | 87.5 | aatataaa/agtataaa | |||
| 6740/6739 | 8305/8304 | 1566/1566 | ATG/ATG | TAG/TAG | 93.49 | |||
|
| 8296/8295 | 8357/8356 | 62/62 | -10/-10 | 98.39 | |||
|
| 8358/8357 | 9324/9323 | 967/967 | 96.38 | ||||
|
| 9325/9324 | 9388/9387 | 64/64 | 98.44 | ||||
|
| 9389/9388 | 10130/10130 | 742/743 | 95.83 | ||||
| 10131/10131 | 10700/10700 | 570/570 | ATG/ATG | TAA/TAA | 94.39 | |||
| GAP14 | 10701/10701 | 10701/10701 | 1/1 | 100 | a/a | |||
|
| 10702/10702 | 10765/10765 | 64/64 | 98.44 | ||||
| GAP15 | 10766/10766 | 10770/10770 | 5/5 | 100 | ttagc/ttagc | |||
| 10771/10771 | 11229/11229 | 459/459 | ATG/ATG | TAG/TAG | 91.29 | |||
| GAP16 | 11230/11230 | 11232/11232 | 3/3 | 100 | ata/ata | |||
|
| 11233/11233 | 11298/11297 | 66/65 | 96.97 | ||||
|
| 11299/11298 | 11521/11521 | 223/224 | 91.07 | ||||
|
| 11522/11522 | 11588/11588 | 67/67 | 91.04 | ||||
| GAP17 | 11589/11589 | 11600/11601 | 12/13 | 84.62 | tgcggggggttt/ttgtggggggttt | |||
|
| 11601/11602 | 11665/11667 | 65/66 | 96.97 | ||||
| GAP18 | 11666/11668 | 11676/11678 | 11/11 | 72.73 | tagttaaaaga/cagttaaataa | |||
|
| 11677/11679 | 11740/11742 | 64/64 | 95.31 | ||||
|
| 11741/11743 | 11795/11797 | 55/55 | 92.73 | ||||
| GAP19 | 11796/11798 | 11798/11800 | 3/3 | 100 | ttt/ttt | |||
| 11799/11801 | 13367/13369 | 1569/1569 | ATG/ATG | TAA/TAA | 90.12 | |||
|
| 13368/13370 | 13616/13552 | 249/183 | 67.86 | ||||
|
| 13617/13553 | 13682/13618 | 66/66 | 96.97 | ||||
| GAP20 | 13683/13619 | 13685/13621 | 3/3 | 100 | aag/aag | |||
| genome | 1/1 | 13685/13621 | 13,685/13,621 | 92.72 | ||||
Nucleotide composition and skewness of different elements of the mitochondrial genomes of Digramma interrupta and Ligula intestinalis
| Region | Size (bp) | T(U) | C | A | G | AT (%) | GC (%) | AT skew | GC skew |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCGs | 10,062/10,062 | 45.6/45.1 | 12.3/13.1 | 21.9/21.5 | 20.2/20.3 | 67.5/66.6 | 32.5/33.4 | -0.351/-0.354 | 0.244/0.216 |
| 1st codon position | 3354/3354 | 41.2/41.4 | 11.2/11.3 | 23.6/23.4 | 24.0/23.9 | 64.8/64.8 | 35.2/35.2 | -0.272/-0.277 | 0.366/0.358 |
| 2nd codon position | 3354/3354 | 47.6/47.3 | 15.1/15.4 | 17.6/17.5 | 19.7/19.7 | 65.2/64.8 | 34.8/35.1 | -0.461/-0.461 | 0.132/0.122 |
| 3rd codon position | 3354/3354 | 47.9/46.5 | 10.6/12.6 | 24.5/23.6 | 17.0/17.4 | 72.4/70.1 | 27.6/30.0 | -0.323/-0.327 | 0.231/0.159 |
| 510/510 | 47.6/47.3 | 13.3/13.3 | 21.6/20.2 | 17.5/19.2 | 69.2/67.5 | 30.8/32.5 | -0.377/-0.401 | 0.134/0.181 | |
| 1566/1566 | 45.0/44.0 | 12.6/13.8 | 22.3/21.8 | 20.1/20.4 | 67.3/65.8 | 32.7/34.2 | -0.336/-0.338 | 0.229/0.194 | |
| 570/570 | 40.2/38.9 | 12.8/14.2 | 23.9/24.7 | 23.2/22.1 | 64.1/63.6 | 36.0/36.3 | -0.255/-0.223 | 0.288/0.217 | |
| 643/643 | 46.8/47.1 | 12.4/12.4 | 20.5/19.4 | 20.2/21.0 | 67.3/66.5 | 32.6/33.4 | -0.390/-0.416 | 0.238/0.256 | |
|
| 1107/1107 | 43.8/43.9 | 13.7/14.1 | 22.1/21.6 | 20.3/20.4 | 65.9/65.5 | 34.0/34.5 | -0.329/-0.341 | 0.194/0.183 |
| 891/891 | 45.3/44.9 | 11.0/11.4 | 20.4/21.1 | 23.2/22.6 | 65.7/66.0 | 34.2/34.0 | -0.379/-0.361 | 0.357/0.327 | |
| 879/879 | 48.9/48.9 | 10.5/11.1 | 21.0/19.8 | 19.6/20.1 | 69.9/68.7 | 30.1/31.2 | -0.398/-0.424 | 0.303/0.287 | |
| 357/357 | 51.3/49.9 | 7.8/9.2 | 21.8/20.7 | 19.0/20.2 | 73.1/70.6 | 26.8/29.4 | -0.402/-0.413 | 0.417/0.371 | |
| 1251/1251 | 47.2/46.9 | 13.7/14.2 | 19.4/19.0 | 19.6/19.8 | 66.6/65.9 | 33.3/34.0 | -0.417/-0.423 | 0.175/0.164 | |
| 261/261 | 48.3/49.4 | 9.2/8.8 | 27.2/27.2 | 15.3/14.6 | 75.5/76.6 | 24.5/23.4 | -0.279/-0.290 | 0.250/0.246 | |
| 1569/1569 | 42.4/41.4 | 13.3/15.2 | 23.8/23.6 | 20.5/19.8 | 66.2/65.0 | 33.8/35.0 | -0.281/-0.273 | 0.214/0.133 | |
| 459/459 | 48.8/48.1 | 9.8/10.2 | 21.1/21.1 | 20.3/20.5 | 69.9/69.2 | 30.1/30.7 | -0.396/-0.390 | 0.348/0.333 | |
|
| 967/967 | 40.1/39.7 | 12.0/12.2 | 28.3/28.2 | 19.5/19.9 | 68.4/67.9 | 31.5/32.1 | -0.172/-0.169 | 0.239/0.239 |
|
| 742/743 | 38.0/38.2 | 12.1/12.9 | 30.2/29.3 | 19.7/19.5 | 68.2/67.5 | 31.8/32.4 | -0.115/-0.131 | 0.237/0.203 |
|
| 223/224 | 44.4/41.5 | 8.5/10.3 | 34.5/33.5 | 12.6/14.7 | 78.9/75.0 | 21.1/25.0 | -0.125/-0.107 | 0.191/0.179 |
|
| 249/183 | 51.8/50.3 | 7.6/6.6 | 22.1/24.6 | 18.5/18.6 | 73.9/74.9 | 26.1/25.2 | -0.402/-0.343 | 0.415/0.478 |
| tRNAs | 1410/1410 | 38.5/37.9 | 12.4/13.0 | 29.1/28.6 | 20.0/20.4 | 67.6/66.5 | 32.4/33.4 | -0.140/-0.141 | 0.234/0.220 |
| Full genome | 13,685/13,621 | 44.1/43.6 | 12.1/12.9 | 23.8/23.4 | 20.0/20.2 | 67.9/67.0 | 32.1/33.1 | -0.299/-0.301 | 0.245/0.221 |
Fig. 2a Ratios of non-synonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) substitution rates estimated from individual protein-coding genes of Digramma interrupta and Ligula intestinalis. b Sliding window analysis of the alignment of complete mtDNAs of D. interrupta and L. intestinalis. The black line shows the value of nucleotide diversity in a sliding window analysis of window size 500 bp with step size 25 bp, and the value is inserted at its mid-point. Gene boundaries are indicated with a variation ratio per gene (below each gene)
Fig. 3Major non-coding regions (mNCRs) in the mitogenomes of Digramma interrupta and Ligula intestinalis. Tandem repeat units are shown on the right. The secondary structures of the mNCRs and consensus repeat sequence are illustrated
Fig. 4Phylogeny of five cestode orders using maximum likelihood analysis inferred from concatenated nucleotide sequences of all 36 genes (12 PCGs, 2 rRNAs and 22 tRNAs). Bootstrap support values are shown above the nodes. The anti-codon of the trnR gene present in individual orders was denoted. The scale-bar represents the estimated number of substitutions per site
Fig. 5Sequence identity of 12 protein-coding genes and two rRNA genes between Digramma interrupta and Ligula intestinalis