Literature DB >> 29846890

Core needle biopsy clarify the histology of the small renal masses and may prevent overtreatment.

N H Azawi1,2, S A Tolouee3, M Madsen3, K D Berg3, C Dahl3, M Fode3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy in small renal masses ≤ 4 cm in response to the rising prevalence of renal masses.
METHODS: Data from 129 consecutive patients who underwent biopsies of solid renal masses of ≤ 4 cm were prospectively collected between September 2014 and January 2017. In cases with inconclusive biopsies, a repeat biopsy was recommended. Histology from surgical specimens was used as gold standard to evaluate the accuracy of renal biopsies.
RESULTS: The initial biopsies revealed malignancy in 77 patients (59.7%) and benign histology in 35 patients (27.1%), whereas 17 (13.2%) were inconclusive. Fifty-six patients with malignant histology underwent either partial or radical nephrectomy according to the physicians' recommendation, while two patients with benign histology requested surgery. In all cases, the biopsy diagnosis was confirmed upon final histopathology. Of the inconclusive cases, six underwent repeat biopsies all with benign histology. Further, three patients opted for immediate partial nephrectomy with benign oncocytoma in two and renal cell carcinoma in the third. The remaining eight patients opted for follow-up CT scans with no sign of progression with a minimum of 6-month follow-up. No biopsy related complications were reported in the first 30 days after RTB. Overall, the treatment strategy changed in 45 of 129 (35%) patients due to biopsy results. This was either due to benign findings or due to the discovery of non-renal cell cancers.
CONCLUSION: Core needle biopsies of solid renal masses ≤ 4 cm have excellent accuracy and may be used to select the correct treatment. Importantly, they may serve to prevent overtreatment of benign tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Overtreatment of small renal masses; Renal cell carcinoma; Small renal masses; Ultrasound-guided biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29846890     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-1885-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  18 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion for the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma using biphasic computed tomography (CT) and multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Maali Al-Subhi; Trevor A Flood; Mohammed El-Khodary; Matthew D F McInnes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time.

Authors:  M Schemper; T L Smith
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-08

3.  Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: initial experience.

Authors:  Scott Gerst; Lucy E Hann; Duan Li; Mithat Gonen; Satish Tickoo; Michael J Sohn; Paul Russo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Michael J Leveridge; Antonio Finelli; John R Kachura; Andrew Evans; Hannah Chung; Daniel A Shiff; Kimberly Fernandes; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses.

Authors:  Frank J Rybicki; Kirstin M Shu; Edmund S Cibas; Julia R Fielding; Eric vanSonnenberg; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States.

Authors:  W H Chow; S S Devesa; J L Warren; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.

Authors:  Borje Ljungberg; Karim Bensalah; Steven Canfield; Saeed Dabestani; Fabian Hofmann; Milan Hora; Markus A Kuczyk; Thomas Lam; Lorenzo Marconi; Axel S Merseburger; Peter Mulders; Thomas Powles; Michael Staehler; Alessandro Volpe; Axel Bex
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses.

Authors:  Yann Neuzillet; Eric Lechevallier; Marc Andre; Laurent Daniel; Christian Coulange
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Accuracy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle core biopsy of renal masses: A single center experience in China.

Authors:  Xianding Wang; Yuanhang Lv; Zilin Xu; Muguo Aniu; Yang Qiu; Bing Wei; Xiaohong Li; Qiang Wei; Qiang Dong; Tao Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  1 in total

1.  Non-invasive urine markers for the differentiation between RCCs and oncocytoma.

Authors:  Melanie von Brandenstein; Jan Herden; Barbara Köditz; Manuel Huerta; Tim Nestler; Axel Heidenreich; Jochen W U Fries
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.