Literature DB >> 15076280

Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses.

Yann Neuzillet1, Eric Lechevallier, Marc Andre, Laurent Daniel, Christian Coulange.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy of solid renal masses 4.0 cm or smaller with helical computerized tomography (CT) guidance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 88 consecutive patients (mean age 61 years) 88 biopsies were performed. Median tumor size was 2.8 cm. Tumor biopsy was performed with an 18 gauge needle using helical CT guidance in an outpatient setting. At least 2 whole cores per tumor were obtained.
RESULTS: Biopsy material was insufficient for analysis in 3 (3.4%) procedures. Median tumor size of failed biopsies was 3.0 cm. There were 5 (5.6%) biopsies which revealed fibrosis and were considered inconclusive. A benign lesion was found in 14 (15.9%) biopsies. In the 66 biopsies positive for malignancy there were 65 cases of renal cell carcinoma and 1 lymphoma. A total of 62 patients underwent surgery. Biopsy changed tumor management in 42 (47.8%) patients who avoided radical nephrectomy, 13 of whom had a lesion which did not require surgery, 1 with a lymphoma and 28 who were treated with partial nephrectomy. Biopsy accuracy for histopathological tumor type and Fuhrman nuclear grade was 92% and 69.8%, respectively. No substantial morbidity occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Fine needle biopsy of small renal masses could select benign lesions for which observation might be an alternative to surgery. The accuracy of fine needle biopsy in identifying histological tumor type was high. However, biopsy was less accurate in evaluating Furhman grade. Biopsy with helical CT guidance could be a key point in tailored management of small solid renal masses and provide important information to those patients harboring renal masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15076280     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000120147.51090.2b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  55 in total

1.  CT fluoroscopy-guided renal tumour cutting needle biopsy: retrospective evaluation of diagnostic yield, safety, and risk factors for diagnostic failure.

Authors:  Toshihiro Iguchi; Takao Hiraki; Yusuke Matsui; Hiroyasu Fujiwara; Jun Sakurai; Yoshihisa Masaoka; Hideo Gobara; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of imaging-guided needle biopsy of renal masses. Retrospective analysis on 150 cases.

Authors:  Andrea Veltri; Irene Garetto; Irene Tosetti; Marco Busso; Alessandro Volpe; Donatella Pacchioni; Enrico Bollito; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Multi-colour FISH on preoperative renal tumour biopsies to confirm the diagnosis of uncertain renal masses.

Authors:  Aliaksei Chyhrai; Jimsgene Sanjmyatav; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Olaf Reichelt; Heiko Wunderlich; Thomas Steiner; Enis Tanović; Kerstin Junker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The role of percutaneous renal biopsy in the management of small renal masses.

Authors:  Rou Wang; Amy Y Li; David P Wood
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Renal mass biopsy to guide treatment decisions for small incidental renal tumors: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Pari V Pandharipande; Debra A Gervais; Rebecca I Hartman; Mukesh G Harisinghani; Adam S Feldman; Peter R Mueller; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  The role of renal biopsy in small renal masses.

Authors:  Rodolfo Burruni; Benoit Lhermitte; Yannick Cerantola; Thomas Tawadros; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Dominik Berthold; Patrice Jichlinski; Massimo Valerio
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Risks of Biopsy in the Diagnosis of a Renal Mass Suspicious for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Michael H Johnson; Phillip M Pierorazio; Stephen M Sozio; Ritu Sharma; Emmanuel Iyoha; Eric B Bass; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Renal cell carcinoma seeding of a percutaneous biopsy tract.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Mullins; Ronald Rodriguez
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Microarray gene expression profiling using core biopsies of renal neoplasia.

Authors:  Craig G Rogers; Jonathon A Ditlev; Min-Han Tan; Jun Sugimura; Chao-Nan Qian; Jeff Cooper; Brian Lane; Michael A Jewett; Richard J Kahnoski; Eric J Kort; Bin T Teh
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.060

10.  Diagnostic performance of prospectively assigned clear cell Likelihood scores (ccLS) in small renal masses at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Sandy Kim; Ryan L Steinberg; Alberto Diaz de Leon; Ivan Pedrosa; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.