| Literature DB >> 29846438 |
Breno Souza de Aguiar1, Cassia Maria Buchalla2, Francisco Chiaravalloti Neto2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE An ecological study describring the spatial characteristics of AIDS in São Paulo city between 2001 and 2010 according to the place of residence of reported cases in adults. METHODS The AIDS reported cases (28,146), grouped by sex, were geocodified (25,969) and linked with a census tract database (18,953). Case and population at risk data supplied spatial cluster identification and relative risk estimate by the scan method, using the discrete Poisson model. Incidence rate and proportional distribution allowed comparing people living in the high-risk clusters areas to other locations by age, race/ethnicity, schooling and transmission category. RESULTS The AIDS incidence rate decreased in both sexes except among young men and older people. The identification of spatial high-risk clusters showed that the decrease of AIDS did not occur in the same way in the city. Clusters located in the central area presented the highest AIDS incidence rates (245.7/100,000 men), especially among black women (RR = 7.9), men who have sex with men (66.2%) and injection drug users (10.7%) participation. In peripheral clusters, identified only in the female population, the epidemic can be related to the poverty of these women (22.5% low education level). Residents in the north and central-south areas of the city are generally black, with little schooling, and predominantly heterosexually infected. CONCLUSIONS The study of spatial clusters using a census tract helps to determine epidemiological patterns inside the city and in specific populations. Spatial stratification and key population epidemiological patterns were identified in four regions in São Paulo city.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29846438 PMCID: PMC5963909 DOI: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Saude Publica ISSN: 0034-8910 Impact factor: 2.106
Figure 1Brazil (A), São Paulo state (B) and São Paulo city by Zone/Region (C).
Figure 2AIDS cases cluster (A) and annual incidence rate, per 100,000 men, age-adjusted (B). São Paulo city, 2001–2010.
Figure 3AIDS cases clusters (A) and annual incidence rate, per 100,000 women, age-adjusted (B). São Paulo city, 2001–2010.
Cluster identification, census tract, cases, relative risk (RR), and related zone/region by sex. São Paulo city, 2001–2010.
| Id | Census track | Cases | RR | Zone/Region | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| n | % | n | % | |||
| Spatial cluster – Male | ||||||
| E1 | 829 | 4.4 | 2,684 | 15.5 | 4.3 | Central, Southeast and Northeast |
| Spatial cluster – Female | ||||||
| E4 | 429 | 2.3 | 506 | 5.8 | 3.0 | Central, Southeast and Northeast |
| E5 | 754 | 4.0 | 712 | 8.2 | 1.9 | Northwest and Northeast |
| E10 | 503 | 2.7 | 346 | 4.0 | 1.5 | South, South Center and Southeast |
Source: SINAN CCD/COVISA – SMS/SP; IBGE 2010.
Clusters incidence rate in 2001, 2010 and entire interval (age-adjusted), age-specific and race-specific (per 100,000 inhabitants), schooling and transmission category proportional distribution (per 100 cases) by sex. São Paulo city, 2001–2010.
| Variable | Male | Female | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| E1 | MSP | E4 | E5 | E10 | FSP | |
| Incidence rate (per 100,000 inhabitants) | ||||||
| 2001 | 245.7 | 62.1 | 56.8 | 43.9 | 33.9 | 24.5 |
| 2010 | 106.3 | 34.5 | 27.6 | 21.7 | 19.4 | 11.6 |
| Interval | 170.4 | 47.6 | 54.5 | 34.0 | 27.1 | 18.8 |
| Age-specific (age group) | ||||||
| 13–29 | 101.3 | 23.6 | 40.6 | 21.6 | 16.4 | 14.0 |
| 30–59 | 251.0 | 65.8 | 77.7 | 51.1 | 40.4 | 27.4 |
| ≥ 60 | 45.3 | 11.3 | 7.4 | 6.7 | 6.4 | 3.9 |
| Race-specific | ||||||
| White | 102.0 | 34.9 | 28.1 | 19.7 | 16.3 | 13.8 |
| Black | 342.8 | 57.0 | 221.4 | 67.1 | 45.1 | 31.5 |
| Brown | 192.6 | 27.6 | 99.3 | 27.3 | 30.4 | 14.9 |
| Proportional distribution (per 100 cases) | ||||||
| Schooling (years)b | ||||||
| None/1–3 | 10.2 | 12.8 | 16.7c | 22.5 | 22.5c | 18.5 |
| 4–7 | 21.4 | 29.3 | 38.6 | 39.2 | 40.7 | 37.2 |
| 8–11 | 40.2 | 39.9 | 35.3 | 33.4 | 31.6 | 37.0 |
| 12 or more | 28.2 | 18.0 | 9.3 | 4.9 | 5.2 | 7.3 |
| Transmission categoryd | ||||||
| Homosexual/Bisexual | 66.2 | 46.0 | 0.3 | 0.5c | 0.3c | 0.3 |
| Heterosexual | 24.9 | 42.2 | 88.7 | 95.1 | 94.9 | 94.0 |
| Injection drug user | 8.7 | 11.3 | 10.7 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 5.2 |
| Otherse | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
Source: SINAN CCD/COVISA – SMS/SP, 2011; IBGE, 2010.
E1: male spatial cluster in Central, Southeast and Northeast; MSP: male population in São Paulo city; E4: female spatial cluster in Central, Southeast and Northeast; E5: female spatial cluster in Northwest and Northeast; E10: female spatial cluster in South, South Center and Southeast; FSP: female population in São Paulo city
“Unknown information” on race/ethnicity variable E1 25.3%, MSP 22.30%, E4 22.1%, E5 24.7%, E10 19.0% and FSP 21.3%.
b “Unknown information” on schooling variable E1 23.4%, MSP 20.4%, E4 27.9%, E5 20.1%, E10 17.6% and FSP 18.8%.
c Results not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
d “Unknown information” on transmission category variable E1 23.0%, MSP 24.1%, E4 28.3%, E5 16.3%, E10 13.7% and FSP 19.5%.
e Mother-to-child transmission, accident with biological material, hemophiliac.