Jian Xu1, Yong Wang1, Jiajun Yin2, Min Yin2, Mofei Wang1, Jingang Liu1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, P.R., China. 2. Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, P.R., China.
Abstract
Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and related pathways are involved in the therapeutic effect of sleeve gastrectomy for overweight or obese patients with diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to investigate the mechanism of FXR expression regulation during the surgical treatment of obese diabetes mellitus by sleeve gastrectomy. Diabetic rats were established by combined streptozotocin and high-fat diet induction. Data collection included body weight, chemical indexes of glucose and lipid metabolism, liver function, and the expression levels of musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene family B (MAFB), FXR, and related genes induced by sleeve gastrectomy. Chang liver cells overexpressing MAFB gene were established to confirm the expression of related genes. The binding and activation of FXR gene by MAFB were tested by Chip and luciferase reporter gene assays. Vertical sleeve gastrectomy induced significant weight loss and decreased blood glucose and lipids in diabetic rat livers, as well as decreased lipid deposition and recovered lipid function. The expression of MAFB, FXR, and FXR-regulated genes in diabetic rat livers were also restored by sleeve gastrectomy. Overexpression of MAFB in Chang liver cells led to FXR gene expression activation and the alteration of multiple FXR-regulated genes. Chip assay showed that MAFB could directly bind with FXR promoter, and the activation of FXR expression was confirmed by luciferase reporter gene analysis. The therapeutic effect of sleeve gastrectomy for overweight or obese patients with diabetes mellitus was mediated by activation of FXR expression through the binding of MAFB transcription factor.
Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and related pathways are involved in the therapeutic effect of sleeve gastrectomy for overweight or obesepatients with diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to investigate the mechanism of FXR expression regulation during the surgical treatment of obese diabetes mellitus by sleeve gastrectomy. Diabeticrats were established by combined streptozotocin and high-fat diet induction. Data collection included body weight, chemical indexes of glucose and lipid metabolism, liver function, and the expression levels of musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene family B (MAFB), FXR, and related genes induced by sleeve gastrectomy. Chang liver cells overexpressing MAFB gene were established to confirm the expression of related genes. The binding and activation of FXR gene by MAFB were tested by Chip and luciferase reporter gene assays. Vertical sleeve gastrectomy induced significant weight loss and decreased blood glucose and lipids in diabeticrat livers, as well as decreased lipid deposition and recovered lipid function. The expression of MAFB, FXR, and FXR-regulated genes in diabeticrat livers were also restored by sleeve gastrectomy. Overexpression of MAFB in Chang liver cells led to FXR gene expression activation and the alteration of multiple FXR-regulated genes. Chip assay showed that MAFB could directly bind with FXR promoter, and the activation of FXR expression was confirmed by luciferase reporter gene analysis. The therapeutic effect of sleeve gastrectomy for overweight or obesepatients with diabetes mellitus was mediated by activation of FXR expression through the binding of MAFB transcription factor.
Diabetes mellitus (DM), also referred to as diabetes, is a common metabolic disorder
characterized by aberrantly increased blood sugar level leading to severe
complications such as cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, stroke, foot ulcers,
and eye disease if left untreated (1). Type 2
DM, previously known as non-insulin-dependent DM, is the most common type of DM
caused by insulin resistance, the condition in which human cells fail to properly
respond to insulin (1). DMpatients are
frequently overweight or obese, and recent progress in an etiological study
suggested that obesity and lack of physical exercise are the main causes of type 2
DM (2). Moreover, a current systematic review
and meta-analysis confirmed that weight control by a healthy eating pattern, energy
intake reduction, and regular physical activity should be encouraged as the primary
prevention and treatment strategies for obesepatients with type 2 DM (3). However, the specific mechanisms underlying
the causative effect of obesity in diabetes development and the therapeutic efficacy
of weight control for diabetics are not well known.Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has been applied as a promising surgical way of weight
control for obese diabetics. A large-scale meta-analysis including 27 independent
studies and 673 DMpatients demonstrated that sleeve gastrectomy produced
significant DM resolution and improvement of DM markers in most diabetics (4). Similar results were also observed by a
mice model investigation showing that vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) could lead
to sustainable weight loss and relieve fatty liver and insulin resistance (5). In an animal model study using the
University of California Davis-type 2 diabetes mellitusrat, VSG was reported to be
effective not only for weight loss and DM resolution, but also for preventing the
onset of type 2 DM (6). However, little is
known about the molecular mechanisms mediating the roles of sleeve gastrectomy in
causing weight loss and diabetes mellitus remission.Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) acts as the sensor and nuclear receptor
of bile acids, which activates FXR activity as nutrient signaling molecules (7). It has been well established that bile
acids, the amphipathic detergent-like molecules as the end-products of cholesterol
catabolism, could promote the solubilization of cholesterol and dietary lipids and
are critically involved in lipid, cholesterol, and glucose metabolism (8,9).
Bile acids binding with FXR induce the expression of fibroblast
growth factor 15/19 to regulate bile acid synthesis, glycogen metabolism, and
gallbladder filling (10). Consistent with the
key roles of FXR in metabolism, FXR has been
demonstrated to be associated with obesity-linked DM. For instance,
FXR activity enhancement through agonist treatment or FXR gene
overexpression leads to significantly decreased blood glucose levels in normal and
diabeticmice, showing the critical function of FXR in glucose
metabolism regulation (11). It is also worth
mentioning that FXR agonists have been successfully applied as promising therapeutic
agents for DM and other non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases (12). More importantly, the therapeutic value of VSG was
revealed to be mediated by FXR signaling, thus leading to reduced body weight and
improved glucose tolerance in DMmice (13).
However, the mechanisms by which FXR was regulated during the substantial resolution
of DM by sleeve gastrectomy deserve further investigation.In this study, the effect of VSG on body weight, blood glucose, and lipid content, as
well as on liver functions, was analyzed using a rat model of obese diabetes. To
address the molecular mechanisms underlying the function of VSG in effectively
inducing weight loss and diabetes symptom resolution, we predicted the
musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene family B (MAFB) as one of the candidate
transcription factors that might bind FXR promoter through bioinformatics analysis
using JASPAR. A previous investigation showed that MAFB functions as a key regulator
of islet α-cell activity and β cell maturation (14). Here, we investigated the influence of SG on MAFB expression, the
regulation of FXR expression by MAFB, and also the downstream regulatory mechanisms,
which provided novel insights into the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effect
of sleeve gastrectomy for obesepatients with DM.
Material and Methods
Diet and animal models
Male Sprague-Dawley 8-week-old rats were housed individually in wire cages in the
Animal Feeding Center of the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital at the Dalian
University and maintained on a 14-h light and 10-h dark cycle. The obesediabeticrats were established by the combination of high-fat diet (Guangdong
Medical Laboratory Animal Center, China) and administration of streptozotocin
(STZ) as previously described with minor modifications (6,15). Briefly, rats
were first fed with a high-fat diet for 12 weeks, and then given a single
intraperitoneal injection of 65 mg/kg of STZ. Three days after the STZ
injection, the glucose content in the venous blood from the tail of STZ-treated
rats was analyzed using a blood glucose meter (iChem-540, iCubio Company,
China). Obese diabeticrats were defined by blood glucose level over 16.7 mmol/L
and a weight of more than 395 g. Rats fed with normal-fat diet (Guangdong
Medical Laboratory Animal Center) and given a single intraperitoneal injection
of water were used as the control. One week later, the VSG or sham surgery was
carried out separately on the obese diabeticrats. The experimental protocols of
this study were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Zhongshan
Hospital of the Dalian University. Rats in this study were classified into three
groups as shown in Figure 1A: the control
group (Con) of normal rats fed with normal-fat diet in combination with
injection of water and sham surgery, the Sham group (Sham) of diabeticrats that
underwent sham surgery, and the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) group of diabeticrats
that underwent VSG.
Figure 1.
A, Experimental scheme and B, body
weights of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Sham, and control (CON) groups.
Diabetes mellitus was established by combination of high-fat diet (HFD)
and streptozotocin (STZ). SG and sham surgery were performed on diabetes
mellitus rats. Rats fed with a normal-fat diet (NFD) and that underwent
sham surgery were used as the control. C, Fasting blood
glucose (FBG); D, fasting insulin (FINS);
E, free fatty acid (FFA); F, total cholesterol
(TC); G, triglyceride (TG). Data are reported as
means±SD. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (t-test).
Vertical sleeve gastrectomy and the sham surgery
VSG was performed on diabeticrats as previously described (6). Briefly, rats were fed with a liquid diet for
consecutive 3 days before the VSG and sham surgery. Approximately 3–5%
isoflurane was used to induce and maintain anesthesia of operated rats. A
midline abdominal incision of approximately 3 cm was first made, followed by the
transection of connective tissue attachments to rat liver and spleen, which
allowed isolating the stomach. Approximately 70% of the stomach containing the
entire fundus was removed and the remnant part in the tubular shape was left to
connect the esophagus and pylorus. After being lavaged properly, the remnant of
stomach was replaced into abdominal cavity. Finally, the abdominal cavity was
closed. A combination of enrofloxacin (20 mg/kg) and meloxicam (2 mg/kg) was
given to the operated rats for 14 consecutive days after surgery. The Sham group
underwent a similar VSG as previously described and nothing was removed before
suturing the abdominal incision of approximately 3 cm (6).
Biochemical and physiological index measurements
Measurements of major biochemical and physiological indexes of the diabeticrats
and the control group were performed as previously described (16). Briefly, after the three groups of
rats were treated with the indicated diet and surgery, the levels of fasting
blood glucose (FBG), free fatty acid (FFA), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride
(TG), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were
determined by an auto-biochemical analysis apparatus supplied with the
biochemical kit (Hitachi, Japan). The fasting insulin (FINS) level was measured
using the insulin radioimmunoassay (RIA) kit (Beijing Atom High Tech, China) by
an automated RIA-immunity analyzer (Xi'an Nuclear Instrument Factory,
China).
Lipid deposition analysis by oil red-O staining
Histological visualization of lipid deposition in liver sections of VSG or sham
surgery-operated diabeticrats and control group was carried out using the oil
red-O (Lipid Stain) kit (#ab150678; Abcam, UK) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. Briefly, the rat liver sections were first incubated in propylene
glycol for 2 min, in oil red-O solution for 6 min, and then in 85% propylene
glycol for 1 min. After being rinsed 2 min with distilled water, the slides were
incubated at 37°C with hematoxylin for 2 min, rinsed again with tapwater and
distilled water, and finally mounted using aqueous mounting medium under a
coverslip. The lipid deposited in rat liver tissues was stained red and observed
under microscopy.
Quantitative RT-PCR and western blotting
The relative mRNA levels of related genes in the rat livers and Chang liver cells
were analyzed by isolation of the total RNA and quantitative RT-PCR method
(qRT-PCR). Briefly, total RNA samples from rat liver tissues or Chang liver
cells were extracted with Trizol solution (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) following the
manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA synthesis was carried out using
approximately 2 µg RNA with EasyScript First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix kit
(TransGen Biotech, China). The quantitative RT-PCR was performed by mixing 2 μL
cDNA and 1 μL specific primers with the TransStart™ SYBR Green qPCR Supermix
(TransGen Biotech) following the manufacturer's instructions. GAPDH was used as
the internal control for the quantitation of gene expression. The sequences of
primers used in this analysis are listed in Table 1. The relative protein abundance of MAFB and FXR in rat liver
tissues and Chang liver cells was determined by western blotting using the
anti-MAFB (#ab56242, Abcam, UK) and anti-FXR (#AB10304, Merck Millipore,
Germany) antibodies according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Table 1.
qPCR primers used in the study.
Gene
Primer
FXR forward
GGGCAACTGCGTGATGGA
FXR reverse
AGGAGGGTCTGCTGGTCTACA
MAFB forward
GCAGCAACGGTAGTGTGGA
MAFB reverse
TGACCTTGTAGGCGTCTCTCT
SHP-1 forward
GCCCTCTCTTCCTGCTTGG
SHP-1 reverse
GGTTGTGGTGGGTCTGGTG
SREBP-1 forward
CCAGCCTTTGAGGATAACCA
SREBP-1 reverse
CCGAAGCATCAGAGGGAGT
CYP7A1: forward
TGCCTTCTGTTACCGAGTGATGTT
CYP7A1 reverse
ACCGGCAGGTCATTCTCTACC
PEPCK forward
GCTGACAGACTCGCCCTATG
PEPCK reverse
CACCGTATCCGCTTCCG
G6Pase forward
CTCAGGAACGCCTTCTATGT
G6Pase reverse
GTGACGGGGAACTGTTTTATC
PPARa forward
AGAATCCACGAAGCCTACCT
PPARa reverse
AGAATCGGACCTCTGCCTC
FXR promoter forward
GGGGTACCAGGAGTCCCTCAGGCAGC
FXR promoter reverse
CCGCTCGAGTGTCATTTGTTTCCCGTCAC
Cell culture and transfection
Human hepatocyte Chang liver cells were purchased from the Cell Bank of the
Chinese Academy of Sciences (China) and cultured in DMEM medium containing 10%
fetal bovine serum with 100 µg/mL streptomycin and 100 U/mL penicillin at 37°C
in an incubator under 95% humidity and 5% CO2. The establishment of
Chang liver cells overexpressing MAFB gene was finished according to the
previously described protocol with minor modifications (17). Briefly, the humanMAFB gene ORF was cloned into the
pcDNA3.0 expression vector as described by the reference. For overexpression of
MAFB gene, Chang liver cells were seeded in a culture dish and transfected with
the MAFB-pcDNA3.0 construct using the Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen,
USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The pcDNA3.0 plasmid was used as
the control plasmid DNA transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent following
the manufacturer's recommendations. The expression levels were finally checked
by real-time PCR and western blotting 48 h after transfection.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
The binding of MAFB with FXR promoter was tested by chromatin immunoprecipitation
(ChIP) using the ChIP Kit (#ab500, Abcam) following the manufacturer's
instructions. The anti-MafA antibody ChIP Grade (#ab17976, Abcam) was used for
immunoprecipitation. Finally, the binding was determined by PCR amplification of
promoter sequence. The antibody against IgG was used as negative control.
Transcriptional activity by luciferase reporter assays
The activation of FXR expression by MAFB was confirmed by luciferase-based
reporter assay using the pGL3 promoter vector (#E1761, Promega, USA) following
the manufacturer's instructions with reference to previously described protocol
(18). Briefly, the wild-type FXR
promoter as well as the mutant version of FXR promoter with mutation of the
predicted binding sites were separately cloned into the pGL3 promoter vector.
The FXR promoter was amplified using primers named FXR promoter forward and
reverse as in Table 1. HEK293 cells
purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences were cultured in
DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum at 37°C under 95% humidity and 5%
CO2. The transfection of HEK293 cells with the pGL3 promoter
vectors containing the wild-type or mutant FXR promoter was carried out using
the Fugene HD transfection reagent (Roche, USA) following the manufacturer's
instructions. The cells were then lysed using passive lysis buffer (Promega) 48
h after transfection. The luciferase enzyme activity was presented as
fold-change relative to the vehicle control.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software package (version 18.0,
SPSS). The significance of differences was statistically tested by the Student's
t-test using data from at least three biological
replicates. Significant differences were defined by a P value <0.05.
Results
VSG induced weight loss and decreased blood glucose and lipids in diabetic
rats
The body weights of rats were measured each week from the beginning of this
study, showing that the high-fat diet induced a significant weight increase in
the Sham and SG groups before surgery, compared to the control group. The sleeve
gastrectomy significantly decreased body weights of diabeticrats in the SG
group (Figure 1A). Consistent with the
change of weight, blood glucose, and lipid analysis also demonstrated that FBG,
FINS, FFA, TC, and TG of the SG group were greatly lowered compared to the Sham
group (Figure 1B-G), showing the effective
function of VSG in causing weight loss and diabetes mellitus resolution via
improved glucose and lipid metabolism.
VSG improved liver function of diabetic rats
The levels of two common liver function markers, AST and ALT, were remarkably
elevated in the sham group, compared with the control group, but VSG effectively
recovered the AST and ALT levels (Figure 2A and
B). Results of the oil red-O dyed-tissues showed that the fat
deposition in the STZ-induced diabeticrats was greatly enhanced compared with
the control group, but sleeve gastrectomy significantly repressed lipid
deposition in diabeticrat liver tissues (Figure
2C). These results indicated that sleeve gastrectomy could
effectively recover the liver functions of diabeticrats, showing the important
mediating role of the liver organ during DM therapy by surgery.
Figure 2.
Sleeve gastrectomy improved liver function of diabetic rats.
A and B: Levels of aspartate
aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in sleeve
gastrectomy (SG), sham, and control (CON) rats. C:
Lipid deposition in liver tissues of SG-operated diabetic rats. Tissues
were stained red by the oil red-O method. Data are reported as means±SD.
**P<0.01 (t-test).
Recovered MAFB and FXR expression by VSG
To explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the physiological effects of VSG,
the MAFB protein, which regulates islet α-cell activity and β cell maturation
(14), was predicted as a possible
regulator of FXR expression (data not shown). Our results showed that the mRNA
levels of both MAFB and FXR were greatly decreased in the liver tissues of
sham-operated diabeticrats, but VSG recovered the MAFB and FXR mRNA levels to
the degrees comparable to those of the control group (Figure 3A and B). Consistently, the decreased protein
abundance of MAFB and FXR in diabeticrat livers was also restored by VSG (Figure 3C). The changes of MAFB and FXR
expression in diabeticrats, which are strictly correlated with glucose
metabolism and liver function, indicated that these two proteins might be key
players mediating DM resolution by sleeve gastrectomy.
Figure 3.
A, MAFB and B, FXR mRNA levels in
sleeve gastrectomy (SG), sham, and control (CON) rats measured by
quantitative RT-PCR. C: MAFB and FXR protein levels
determined by western blotting. GAPDH was applied as the internal
control. MAFB: musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene family A; FXR:
farnesoid X receptor; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Data are reported as means±SD. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01
(t-test).
Modulation of FXR-regulated signaling components by sleeve
gastrectomy
To further investigate the role of FXR in VSG-regulated glucose metabolism and
diabetes mellitus progression, the expression levels of six key signaling
components regulated by FXR in VSG-operated diabeticrat livers were also
measured by quantitative RT-PCR method. The mRNA level of small heterodimer
partner 1 (SHP-1) was significantly decreased in diabeticrats but recovered by
VSG (Figure 4A). On the contrary, the
expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) was
remarkably increased in diabeticrat livers compared with the control group, but
markedly repressed by the VSG (Figure 4B).
The expression level of peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα)
showed the same alteration in these groups as SHP-1 (Figure 4C). Also, the expression of cholesterol
7α-hydroxylase gene (CYP7A1) exhibited correlative alteration in the sham and
SG-operated diabetic liver rats compared with the control group (Figure 4D). Moreover, our results showed
that the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) expression was contrarily
influenced by the sham surgery and VSG in diabeticrats (Figure 4E). No significant change of the
glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) was detected in this assay (Figure 4F). The significant and correlated expression
changes of these FXR-regulated genes provided multiple lines of evidence
suggesting the strong regulatory functions of FXR in resolution of DM by
VSG.
Figure 4.
mRNA levels of six FXR-regulated genes, SHP (A),
SREBP (B), PPAR (C), CYP7A1
(D), PEPCK (E), and G6pase
(F) in livers of diabetic rats that underwent
sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or sham surgery analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR.
GAPDH was applied as the internal control in qRT-PCR analyses. Con:
control group; SHP-1: small heterodimer partner 1; SREBP-1: sterol
regulatory element binding protein-1; PPARα:
peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor α; CYP7A1: cholesterol
7α-hydroxylase gene (CYP7A1); PEPCK: phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase;
G6Pase: glucose-6-phosphatase. Data are reported as means±SD.
**P<0.01 (t-test).
Overexpression of MAFB regulated FXR-associated signaling cascades
To investigate the role of MAFB in regulating FXR expression and downstream
signaling cascades, Chang liver cells were transiently transfected with pcDNA3.0
plasmid containing the open-reading frame (ORF) of MAFB, and the original
pcDNA3.0 vector was used as the control. The overexpression of MAFB in Chang
liver cells were confirmed by both the quantitative RT-PCR and western blotting
(Figure 5A and C). More importantly,
the expression of FXR was also greatly enhanced by overexpression of MAFB in
Chang liver cells, showing the direct activating effect of MAFB on FXR
expression (Figure 5B and C). To further
explore the role of MAFB in inducing FXR expression, these four FXR-regulated
genes shown in Figure 4D to I, together
with G6Pase and PPARα, were also analyzed. Our results demonstrated that the
expression of SHP, G6Pase, PPARα, SREBP, PEPCK, and CYP7A1 were all greatly
altered by the overexpression of MAFB in Chang liver cells. These cells clearly
showed the potent ability of MAFB in regulating FXR and related molecular
processes in human liver cells.
Figure 5.
mRNA levels of MAFB (A) and FXR (B)
in Chang liver cells overexpressing MAFB gene (over-MAFB) were analyzed
by quantitative RT-PCR and by western blotting (C). The
mRNA levels of SHP (D), G6Pase (E),
PPARα (F), SREBP (G), PEPCK
(H), and CYP7A1 (I) were analyzed
by quantitative RT-PCR. GAPDH was applied as the internal control in
qRT-PCR analysis. Con: control group; FXR: farnesoid X receptor; SHP:
small heterodimer partner; SREBP-1: sterol regulatory element binding
protein-1; CYP7A1: cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase gene (CYP7A1); PEPCK:
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; G6Pase: glucose-6-phosphatase; PPARα:
peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor α. Data are reported as
means±SD. **P<0.01 (t-test).
MAFB binded with FXR promoter to induce FXR expression
The RT-PCR amplification following Chip assay demonstrated that MAFB protein
directly associated with FXR promoter in HEK293 cells (Figure 6A). For the investigation of activating ability of
MAFB binding for FXR expression, luciferase reporter assay was also performed in
HEK293 cells, and results showed that the luciferase gene was significantly
activated by the binding of MAFB with FXR promoter, while the mutant version
showed no significant activation of reporter gene expression. These results
clearly demonstrated that MAFB was a key transcription factor responsible for
the activation of FXR expression by directly binding the FXR gene promoter.
Figure 6.
A, The binding of MAFB with FXR promoter was analyzed
by Chip assay using antibodies against MAFB protein (left), and
statistical analysis was based on data from three biological replicates
(right). IgG was used as the negative control. B,
Activation of FXR gene expression by MAFB binding by luciferase reporter
assay. C, Schematic demonstration of the luciferase
reporter assay. MAFB: musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene family;
F/R: Firefly luciferase/Ranilla luciferase; WT: wild type; MUT: mutant;
FXR: farnesoid X receptor. Data are reported as means±SD. **P<0.01,
***P<0.001 (t-test).
Discussion
DM is a severe metabolic disorder characterized with dysregulated glucose metabolism
and previous investigations showed strong correlation of DM with obesity (2). Although weight control by surgical
operations like VSG has been shown to be an effective method for treatment of DMpatients with severe obesity (4), the
molecular mechanisms underlying this method are still poorly understood. As
introduced above, FXR was shown to be an important mediator of DM development by
regulating glucose and lipid metabolism and was revealed to be involved in the
therapeutic effect of VSG (12,13). However, the regulation of
FXR gene expression during DM progression is not well
investigated, especially the transcription factors responsible for the activation of
FXR expression associated with DM. Using bioinformatics analysis,
MAFB gene was found to be a potential transcription factor
regulating FXR gene expression. In this study, we reported that the
expression of MAFB was strictly correlated with FXR and multiple FXR-regulated genes
in diabeticrats that underwent VSG.The enhancement of FXR expression by MAFB was further confirmed by the overexpression
of MAFB gene in Chang liver cells. This regulation was supported by the expression
of downstream genes controlled by FXR, including SHP-1 as the nuclear receptor
induced by FXR and involved in bile acid biosynthesis (19), SREBP-1, which is associated with lipid metabolism and
negatively regulated by FXR (20), PPARα,
which controls SREBP activity and lipid synthesis (21), CYP7A1, which acts as another important regulator of bile acid
metabolism inhibited by both FXR and SHP (19,22), and also PEPCK, which
regulates the rate-limiting step of hepatic gluconeogenesis and is activated by FXR
(23). G6Pase acts as regulator of hepatic
gluconeogenesis (24), and we noticed that its
expression in rat livers exhibited no significant alteration as shown in Figure 4F, which might be due to the functional
abundance of multiple metabolism regulators (25) or the specific expression and functioning of G6Pase isozymes (26). Moreover, by Chip assay and
luciferase-based reporter gene analysis, we found that the activation of FXR
expression was mediated by the direct binding of MAFB with FXR promoter. These
results revealed a novel mechanism of FXR-mediated DM development and treatment by
sleeve gastrectomy, through the transcription factor activity of MAFB. Combined with
roles of FXR in bile acid, glycogen, and lipid metabolism (10,27), these findings
indicated that surgery resulted in FXR expression change, downstream signaling
activation, and metabolic adaptions. This discovery provided important insight into
the molecular pathogenesis of DM, as well as the therapeutic effect of sleeve
gastrectomy.MAFB protein, as a basic leucine-zipper-containing transcription factor, was first
identified as the interacting partner of the DNA-bound Ets-1 protein and involved in
erythroid differentiation (28). Further
investigation showed that MAFB plays roles in multiple biological and pathological
process such as monocytic differentiation, osteoclast differentiation, self-renewal
of differentiated functional macrophages, myeloid commitment divisions of
hematopoietic stem cells, respiratory rhythmogenesis, and fatal central apnea (29). More importantly, MAFB was later found to
be a potent regulator of pancreatic α-cell activity and β cell maturation (14,30).
For instance, MAFB was shown to regulate cell type-specific glucagon gene expression
and associated with islet cell development and obesity (31). One recent study using a mice model reported that MafB
deficiency in hematopoietic cells could lead to a greatly increased percentage of
body fat, thus accelerating the development of obesity (31). Considering the close association of islet beta cell
failure in obesity-associated diabetes (32),
it is reasonable to predict the involvement of MAFB in DM development because of the
beta cell compensation for insulin resistance. Not surprisingly, MAFB was found to
possess a protective role for diabetic nephropathy by regulation of multiple
pathways including antioxidative enzymes and Notch pathways (33). In this study, we discovered the direct link between
MAFB-regulated target gene expression and DM development and treatment, which could
lay down key research basis for the understanding of diabetes pathogenesis and novel
therapy development. It should be noted that MAFB, as a transcription factor, might
regulate the expression of multiple genes besides FXR, suggesting that further study
of its downstream regulatory pathways could broaden our understanding of DM
development. In consideration of the several functions of MAFB and FXR in
metabolism, the possible involvement of MAFB-regulated FXR expression in other
metabolic disease deserves further investigation.Moreover, the application of diabeticrat or mouse models induced by high-fat diet
and STZ, an antibiotic causing the destruction of pancreatic islet β-cells, has been
accepted as a feasible way to test clinical therapeutic effects and underlying
mechanism of VSG for diabeticpatients (34).
Both the mice and rats are sensitive to the pancreatic β-cell cytotoxic effects
induced by STZ treatment (34), but rats are
more suitable for surgical operation due to body shape and thus were applied in this
study. By strictly following the widely proven protocol, we successfully established
the obese DMrat model, which was confirmed by a change of the body weight and a
number of physiological indexes associated with glucose and lipid metabolism and
liver function after VSG. This establishment provided the basis for the mechanism
investigation of DM combined with obesity and confirmed the applicability of this
model for obese DM studies.In summary, we reported the characterization of MAFB as a novel transcription factor
responsible for the activation of FXR expression and downstream pathway during DM
resolution induced by sleeve gastrectomy. The transcription factor activity of MAFB
for FXR expression was confirmed by expression analysis in diabeticrat livers and
Chang liver cells, combined with the binding and luciferase reporter gene assays.
The discovery provides meaningful insight into the molecular processes underlying DM
development, as well as the therapeutic effects of sleeve gastrectomy.
Authors: B Goodwin; S A Jones; R R Price; M A Watson; D D McKee; L B Moore; C Galardi; J G Wilson; M C Lewis; M E Roth; P R Maloney; T M Willson; S A Kliewer Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Elizabeth Conrad; Chunhua Dai; Jason Spaeth; Min Guo; Holly A Cyphert; David Scoville; Julie Carroll; Wei-Ming Yu; Lisa V Goodrich; David M Harlan; Kevin L Grove; Charles T Roberts; Alvin C Powers; Guoqiang Gu; Roland Stein Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 4.310