Charlene A Wong1,2,3, Sajal Kulhari4, Ellen J McGeoch4, Arthur T Jones4, Janet Weiner4, Daniel Polsky4, Tom Baker4,5. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, 100 Fuqua Drive, Box 90120, Durham, NC, 27708-0120, USA. charlene.wong@duke.edu. 2. Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. charlene.wong@duke.edu. 3. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. charlene.wong@duke.edu. 4. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 5. University of Pennsylvania Law School, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The design of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) health insurance marketplaces influences complex health plan choices. OBJECTIVE: To compare the choice environments of the public health insurance exchanges in the fourth (OEP4) versus third (OEP3) open enrollment period and to examine online marketplace run by private companies, including a total cost estimate comparison. DESIGN: In November-December 2016, we examined the public and private online health insurance exchanges. We navigated each site for "real-shopping" (personal information required) and "window-shopping" (no required personal information). PARTICIPANTS: Public (n = 13; 12 state-based marketplaces and HealthCare.gov ) and private (n = 23) online health insurance exchanges. MAIN MEASURES: Features included consumer decision aids (e.g., total cost estimators, provider lookups) and plan display (e.g., order of plans). We examined private health insurance exchanges for notable features (i.e., those not found on public exchanges) and compared the total cost estimates on public versus private exchanges for a standardized consumer. RESULTS: Nearly all studied consumer decision aids saw increased deployment in the public marketplaces in OEP4 compared to OEP3. Over half of the public exchanges (n = 7 of 13) had total cost estimators (versus 5 of 14 in OEP3) in window-shopping and integrated provider lookups (window-shopping: 7; real-shopping: 8). The most common default plan orders were by premium or total cost estimate. Notable features on private health insurance exchanges were unique data presentation (e.g., infographics) and further personalized shopping (e.g., recommended plan flags). Health plan total cost estimates varied substantially between the public and private exchanges (average difference $1526). CONCLUSIONS: The ACA's public health insurance exchanges offered more tools in OEP4 to help consumers select a plan. While private health insurance exchanges presented notable features, the total cost estimates for a standardized consumer varied widely on public versus private exchanges.
BACKGROUND: The design of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) health insurance marketplaces influences complex health plan choices. OBJECTIVE: To compare the choice environments of the public health insurance exchanges in the fourth (OEP4) versus third (OEP3) open enrollment period and to examine online marketplace run by private companies, including a total cost estimate comparison. DESIGN: In November-December 2016, we examined the public and private online health insurance exchanges. We navigated each site for "real-shopping" (personal information required) and "window-shopping" (no required personal information). PARTICIPANTS: Public (n = 13; 12 state-based marketplaces and HealthCare.gov ) and private (n = 23) online health insurance exchanges. MAIN MEASURES: Features included consumer decision aids (e.g., total cost estimators, provider lookups) and plan display (e.g., order of plans). We examined private health insurance exchanges for notable features (i.e., those not found on public exchanges) and compared the total cost estimates on public versus private exchanges for a standardized consumer. RESULTS: Nearly all studied consumer decision aids saw increased deployment in the public marketplaces in OEP4 compared to OEP3. Over half of the public exchanges (n = 7 of 13) had total cost estimators (versus 5 of 14 in OEP3) in window-shopping and integrated provider lookups (window-shopping: 7; real-shopping: 8). The most common default plan orders were by premium or total cost estimate. Notable features on private health insurance exchanges were unique data presentation (e.g., infographics) and further personalized shopping (e.g., recommended plan flags). Health plan total cost estimates varied substantially between the public and private exchanges (average difference $1526). CONCLUSIONS: The ACA's public health insurance exchanges offered more tools in OEP4 to help consumers select a plan. While private health insurance exchanges presented notable features, the total cost estimates for a standardized consumer varied widely on public versus private exchanges.
Entities:
Keywords:
Affordable Care Act; consumerism; decision support; health insurance; health insurance marketplace
Authors: Mary C Politi; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Matthew Kreuter; Enbal Shacham; Melissa C Lovell; Timothy McBride Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Charlene A Wong; Daniel E Polsky; Arthur T Jones; Janet Weiner; Robert J Town; Tom Baker Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Charlene A Wong; David A Asch; Cjloe M Vinoya; Carol A Ford; Tom Baker; Robert Town; Raina M Merchant Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Stella M Yala; Obidiugwu Kenrik Duru; Susan L Ettner; Norman Turk; Carol M Mangione; Arleen F Brown Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-12-20 Impact factor: 2.655