Literature DB >> 11138768

When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing?

S S Iyengar1, M R Lepper.   

Abstract

Current psychological theory and research affirm the positive affective and motivational consequences of having personal choice. These findings have led to the popular notion that the more choice, the better-that the human ability to manage, and the human desire for, choice is unlimited. Findings from 3 experimental studies starkly challenge this implicit assumption that having more choices is necessarily more intrinsically motivating than having fewer. These experiments, which were conducted in both field and laboratory settings, show that people are more likely to purchase gourmet jams or chocolates or to undertake optional class essay assignments when offered a limited array of 6 choices rather than a more extensive array of 24 or 30 choices. Moreover, participants actually reported greater subsequent satisfaction with their selections and wrote better essays when their original set of options had been limited. Implications for future research are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11138768     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  139 in total

1.  Decision-making Strategies and Performance among Seniors.

Authors:  Tibor Besedeš; Cary Deck; Sudipta Sarangi; Mikhael Shor
Journal:  J Econ Behav Organ       Date:  2012-02-01

2.  Market characteristics and awareness of managed care options among elderly beneficiaries enrolled in traditional Medicare.

Authors:  Jessica N Mittler; Bruce E Landon; Alan M Zaslavsky; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2011-10-14

3.  Health insurance coverage and take-up: lessons from behavioral economics.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; William J Congdon; Sendhil Mullainathan
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Neural inhibition enables selection during language processing.

Authors:  Hannah R Snyder; Natalie Hutchison; Erika Nyhus; Tim Curran; Marie T Banich; Randall C O'Reilly; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Impact of a Randomized Controlled Trial in Arsenic Risk Communication on Household Water-Source Choices in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Lori Bennear; Alessandro Tarozzi; Alexander Pfaff; Soumya Balasubramanya; Kazi Matin Ahmed; Alexander van Geen
Journal:  J Environ Econ Manage       Date:  2013-03-01

6.  The effect of choice on the physiology of emotion: an affective startle modulation study.

Authors:  Alexander Genevsky; David E Gard
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  What we regret most... and why.

Authors:  Neal J Roese; Amy Summerville
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-09

8.  Can limiting choice increase social welfare? The elderly and health insurance.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Thomas Rice
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  Older adults place lower value on choice relative to young adults.

Authors:  Joseph A Mikels; Andrew E Reed; Kosali I Simon
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.