PURPOSE: Fluid management within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols is designed to maintain a euvolemic state avoiding the negative sequelae of hypervolemia or hypovolemia. We sought to determine the effect of a recent ERAS protocol implementation on kidney function and on the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: A total of 132 elective colorectal resections performed using our ERAS protocol were compared to a propensity-matched group prior to ERAS implementation. Fluid balance, urine output, creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were recorded for all patients, and the incidence of AKI was determined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. RESULTS: Implementation of our ERAS protocol decreased average postoperative length of hospital stay (5.5 vs 7.7 days, p < 0.0001) and time to return of bowel function (2.5 vs 4.1 days, p < 0.0001). The rate of postoperative AKI increased following implementation of the protocol (11.4 vs 2.3%, p < 0.0001). However, by the time of discharge, the average creatinine of ERAS patients who had experienced AKI had returned to their preoperative baseline values (p = 0.9037). Significant univariate predictors of AKI in ERAS patients were longer operative times (p < 0.01) and the diagnosis of diverticulitis (p < 0.01). Within our ERAS patients, AKI was associated with a prolonged postoperative length of hospital stay (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the proven benefits of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, care should be taken during protocol implementation to monitor for and to prevent acute kidney injury.
PURPOSE: Fluid management within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols is designed to maintain a euvolemic state avoiding the negative sequelae of hypervolemia or hypovolemia. We sought to determine the effect of a recent ERAS protocol implementation on kidney function and on the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: A total of 132 elective colorectal resections performed using our ERAS protocol were compared to a propensity-matched group prior to ERAS implementation. Fluid balance, urine output, creatinine, and blood ureanitrogen (BUN) were recorded for all patients, and the incidence of AKI was determined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. RESULTS: Implementation of our ERAS protocol decreased average postoperative length of hospital stay (5.5 vs 7.7 days, p < 0.0001) and time to return of bowel function (2.5 vs 4.1 days, p < 0.0001). The rate of postoperative AKI increased following implementation of the protocol (11.4 vs 2.3%, p < 0.0001). However, by the time of discharge, the average creatinine of ERAS patients who had experienced AKI had returned to their preoperative baseline values (p = 0.9037). Significant univariate predictors of AKI in ERAS patients were longer operative times (p < 0.01) and the diagnosis of diverticulitis (p < 0.01). Within our ERAS patients, AKI was associated with a prolonged postoperative length of hospital stay (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the proven benefits of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, care should be taken during protocol implementation to monitor for and to prevent acute kidney injury.
Authors: Ronald C W Ma; Chun Chung Chow; Vincent T F Yeung; Wing Yee So; Alice P S Kong; Peter C Y Tong; Clive S Cockram; Juliana C N Chan Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; W Schwenk; N Demartines; D Roulin; N Francis; C E McNaught; J Macfie; A S Liberman; M Soop; A Hill; R H Kennedy; D N Lobo; K Fearon; O Ljungqvist Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Murat Biteker; Akın Dayan; Ahmet İlker Tekkeşin; Mehmet M Can; İbrahim Taycı; Erkan İlhan; Gülizar Şahin Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: W E Longo; K S Virgo; F E Johnson; C A Oprian; A M Vernava; T P Wade; M A Phelan; W G Henderson; J Daley; S F Khuri Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Azra Bihorac; Sinan Yavas; Sophie Subbiah; Charles E Hobson; Jesse D Schold; Andrea Gabrielli; A Joseph Layon; Mark S Segal Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper; Michael Heung; Andrew L Rosenberg; Michael Englesbe; Amy M Shanks; Darrell A Campbell Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Tong J Gan; Andrew Soppitt; Mohamed Maroof; Habib el-Moalem; Kerri M Robertson; Eugene Moretti; Peter Dwane; Peter S A Glass Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Sarah P Huepenbecker; Maria D Iniesta; Andrés Zorrilla-Vaca; Pedro T Ramirez; Katherine E Cain; Micah Vaughn; Juan P Cata; Gabriel E Mena; Javier Lasala; Larissa A Meyer Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2021-08-13 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Fabian Grass; Jenna K Lovely; Jacopo Crippa; Kellie L Mathis; Martin Hübner; David W Larson Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Ross Harrison; Maria D Iniesta; Brandelyn Pitcher; Pedro T Ramirez; Katherine Cain; Ashley M Siverand; Gabriel Mena; Javier Lasala; Larissa A Meyer Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Magdalena Pisarska; Natalia Gajewska; Piotr Małczak; Michał Wysocki; Piotr Major; Katarzyna Milian-Ciesielska; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2018-11-04 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Anthony Bonavia; Milad Javaherian; Alexander J Skojec; Vernon M Chinchilli; Berend Mets; Kunal Karamchandani Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 1.817