N J Bishop1, K E Zuniga, A L Lucht. 1. Nicholas Joseph Bishop, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, USA, (512) 245-7051, n_b110@txstate.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Our first objective was to estimate empirically-derived subgroups (latent profiles) of observed carbohydrate, protein, and fat intake density in a nationally representative sample of older U.S. adults. Our second objective was to determine whether membership in these groups was associated with levels of, and short term change in, physical mobility limitations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Measures of macronutrient density were taken from the 2013 Health Care and Nutrition Study, an off-year supplement to the Health and Retirement Study, which provided indicators of physical mobility limitations and sociodemographic and health-related covariates. PARTICIPANTS: 3,914 community-dwelling adults age 65 years and older. MEASUREMENTS: Percent of daily calories from carbohydrate, protein, and fat were calculated based on responses to a modified Harvard food frequency questionnaire. Latent profile analysis was used to describe unobserved heterogeneity in measures of carbohydrate, protein, and fat density. Mobility limitation counts were based on responses to 11 items indicating physical limitations. Poisson regression models with autoregressive controls were used to identify associations between macronutrient density profile membership and mobility limitations. Sociodemographic and health-related covariates were included in all Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Four latent subgroups of macronutrient density were identified: "High Carbohydrate", "Moderate with Fat", "Moderate", and "Low Carbohydrate/High Fat". Older adults with the lowest percentage of daily calories coming from carbohydrate and the greatest percentage coming from fat ("Low Carbohydrate/High Fat") were found to have greater reported mobility limitations in 2014 than those identified as having moderate macronutrient density, and more rapid two-year increases in mobility limitations than those identified as "Moderate with Fat" or "Moderate". CONCLUSION: Older adults identified as having the lowest carbohydrate and highest fat energy density were more likely to report a greater number of mobility limitations and experience greater increases in these limitations than those identified as having moderate macronutrient density. These results suggest that the interrelation of macronutrients must be considered by those seeking to reduce functional limitations among older adults through dietary interventions.
OBJECTIVES: Our first objective was to estimate empirically-derived subgroups (latent profiles) of observed carbohydrate, protein, and fat intake density in a nationally representative sample of older U.S. adults. Our second objective was to determine whether membership in these groups was associated with levels of, and short term change in, physical mobility limitations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Measures of macronutrient density were taken from the 2013 Health Care and Nutrition Study, an off-year supplement to the Health and Retirement Study, which provided indicators of physical mobility limitations and sociodemographic and health-related covariates. PARTICIPANTS: 3,914 community-dwelling adults age 65 years and older. MEASUREMENTS: Percent of daily calories from carbohydrate, protein, and fat were calculated based on responses to a modified Harvard food frequency questionnaire. Latent profile analysis was used to describe unobserved heterogeneity in measures of carbohydrate, protein, and fat density. Mobility limitation counts were based on responses to 11 items indicating physical limitations. Poisson regression models with autoregressive controls were used to identify associations between macronutrient density profile membership and mobility limitations. Sociodemographic and health-related covariates were included in all Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Four latent subgroups of macronutrient density were identified: "High Carbohydrate", "Moderate with Fat", "Moderate", and "Low Carbohydrate/High Fat". Older adults with the lowest percentage of daily calories coming from carbohydrate and the greatest percentage coming from fat ("Low Carbohydrate/High Fat") were found to have greater reported mobility limitations in 2014 than those identified as having moderate macronutrient density, and more rapid two-year increases in mobility limitations than those identified as "Moderate with Fat" or "Moderate". CONCLUSION: Older adults identified as having the lowest carbohydrate and highest fat energy density were more likely to report a greater number of mobility limitations and experience greater increases in these limitations than those identified as having moderate macronutrient density. These results suggest that the interrelation of macronutrients must be considered by those seeking to reduce functional limitations among older adults through dietary interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health Care and Nutrition Study (HCNS); Health and Retirement Study (HRS); Macronutrient density; latent profile analysis; mobility limitations
Authors: Marjolein E M den Ouden; Marieke J Schuurmans; Ilse E M A Arts; Yvonne T van der Schouw Journal: Geriatr Gerontol Int Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 2.730
Authors: Richard D Semba; Ravi Varadhan; Benedetta Bartali; Luigi Ferrucci; Michelle O Ricks; Caroline Blaum; Linda P Fried Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2006-11-17 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Jürgen Bauer; Gianni Biolo; Tommy Cederholm; Matteo Cesari; Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; John E Morley; Stuart Phillips; Cornel Sieber; Peter Stehle; Daniel Teta; Renuka Visvanathan; Elena Volpi; Yves Boirie Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Jeannette M Beasley; Andrea Z LaCroix; Marian L Neuhouser; Ying Huang; Lesley Tinker; Nancy Woods; Yvonne Michael; J David Curb; Ross L Prentice Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: W C Willett; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; C Bain; J Witschi; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1985-07 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Luz M León-Muñoz; Esther García-Esquinas; Esther López-García; José R Banegas; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo Journal: BMC Med Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 8.775