Literature DB >> 29806167

Nucleophilic Influences and Origin of the SN 2 Allylic Effect.

Boris Galabov1, Gergana Koleva1, Henry F Schaefer2, Wesley D Allen2.   

Abstract

The potential energy surfaces for the SN 2 reactions of allyl and propyl chlorides with 21 anionic and neutral nucleophiles was studied by using ωB97X-D/6-311++G(3df,2pd) computations. The "allylic effect" on SN 2 barriers was observed for all reactions, and compared with propyl substrates, the energy barriers differed by -0.2 to -4.5 kcal mol-1 in the gas phase. Strong correlations of the SN 2 net activation barriers with cation affinities, proton affinities, and electrostatic potentials at nuclei demonstrated the powerful influence of electrostatic interactions on these reactions. For the reactions of anionic (but not neutral) nucleophiles with allyl chloride, some of the incoming negative charge (0.2-18 %) migrated into the carbon chains, which would provide secondary stabilization of the SN 2 transition states. Activation strain analysis provided additional insight into the allylic effect by showing that the energy of geometric distortion for the reactants to reach the SN 2 transition state was smaller for each allylic reaction than for its propyl analogue. In many cases, the interaction energies between the substrate and nucleophile in this analysis were more favorable for propyl chloride reactions, but this compensation did not overcome the predominant strain energy effect.
© 2018 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allylic compounds; electrostatic interactions; nucleophilic substitution; solvent effects; transition states

Year:  2018        PMID: 29806167     DOI: 10.1002/chem.201801187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemistry        ISSN: 0947-6539            Impact factor:   5.236


  9 in total

1.  SN2 versus SN2' Competition.

Authors:  Thomas Hansen; Pascal Vermeeren; Lea de Jong; F Matthias Bickelhaupt; Trevor A Hamlin
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.198

2.  Understanding chemical reactivity using the activation strain model.

Authors:  Pascal Vermeeren; Stephanie C C van der Lubbe; Célia Fonseca Guerra; F Matthias Bickelhaupt; Trevor A Hamlin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  PyFrag 2019-Automating the exploration and analysis of reaction mechanisms.

Authors:  Xiaobo Sun; Thomas M Soini; Jordi Poater; Trevor A Hamlin; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  SN2 versus E2 Competition of F- and PH2- Revisited.

Authors:  Pascal Vermeeren; Thomas Hansen; Maxime Grasser; Daniela Rodrigues Silva; Trevor A Hamlin; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  How Solvation Influences the SN2 versus E2 Competition.

Authors:  Thomas Hansen; Jasper C Roozee; F Matthias Bickelhaupt; Trevor A Hamlin
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.354

6.  C-X Bond Activation by Palladium: Steric Shielding versus Steric Attraction.

Authors:  Thomas Hansen; Xiaobo Sun; Marco Dalla Tiezza; Willem-Jan van Zeist; Joost N P van Stralen; Daan P Geerke; Lando P Wolters; Jordi Poater; Trevor A Hamlin; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.020

7.  Chemical reactivity from an activation strain perspective.

Authors:  Pascal Vermeeren; Trevor A Hamlin; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  A Unified Framework for Understanding Nucleophilicity and Protophilicity in the SN 2/E2 Competition.

Authors:  Pascal Vermeeren; Thomas Hansen; Paul Jansen; Marcel Swart; Trevor A Hamlin; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.236

9.  C(spn )-X (n=1-3) Bond Activation by Palladium.

Authors:  Thomas Hansen; Xiaobo Sun; Marco Dalla Tiezza; Willem-Jan van Zeist; Jordi Poater; Trevor A Hamlin; F M Bickelhaupt
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.020

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.