Literature DB >> 16923978

Prospective clinical follow-up after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Maurits H J Voormolen1, Paul N Lohle, Leo E Lampmann, Wilco van den Wildenberg, Job R Juttmann, Carel H Diekerhof, Jan de Waal Malefijt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess short-term, midterm, and long-term pain relief in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at the treated vertebral level, analgesic use, and satisfaction with outcome were assessed in 112 patients after PV of 168 VCFs. Serial follow-up was performed at 24 hours and 3, 6, and 12 months and in a small number of patients at 1-3 years. Procedure-related complications were evaluated by physical examination and computed tomography of treated levels.
RESULTS: After PV, VAS scores for pain at the individual vertebral levels treated and use of analgesic agents were significantly reduced compared with before treatment at every follow-up period. Within 24 hours after the procedure, the decreases in all scores were less compared with scores at later follow-up periods, but this was not significant. The preprocedural mean VAS score was 8.8 (range, 5-10). At follow-up, mean VAS scores ranged from 2.5 to 3.3 (range, 0-10). In the short term after PV, patients used significantly less analgesic drugs and 86% of patients were satisfied with the outcome. At midterm and long-term follow-up, patients used even less analgesic drugs and 95%-100% of patients were satisfied with the outcome of PV. Procedure-related complications with clinical consequences occurred in three patients (2.7%): one patient experienced a cardiovascular reaction, one patient had a pedicle chip fracture, and one had a rib fracture.
CONCLUSION: PV of painful osteoporotic VCFs provides significant pain reduction in nearly all treated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16923978     DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000231952.75209.4A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  27 in total

1.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty in vertebral compression fractures of benign or malignant origin: a prospective study of 1188 patients with follow-up of 12 months.

Authors:  Anastasios Mpotsaris; Razmin Abdolvahabi; Bastian Hoffleith; Janpeter Nickel; Ali Harati; Christian Loehr; Chun Hee Gerdes; Svenja Hennigs; Werner Weber
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: how good is the evidence?

Authors:  Fergus E McKiernan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  The association between the duration of preoperative pain and pain improvement in vertebral augmentation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Ehteshami Rad; M T Luetmer; M H Murad; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Minimal invasive treatment of vertebral compression fractures: vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Hendrik Fransen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Natural history of pain in patients with conservatively treated osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: results from VERTOS II.

Authors:  A Venmans; C A Klazen; P N M Lohle; W P Mali; W J van Rooij
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Optimizing bone cement stiffness for vertebroplasty through biomechanical effects analysis based on patient-specific three-dimensional finite element modeling.

Authors:  Yi Peng; Xianping Du; Lihua Huang; Jinsong Li; Ruisen Zhan; Weiguo Wang; Biaoxiang Xu; Song Wu; Cheng Peng; Shijie Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  A prospective randomized controlled study comparing the pain relief in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with the use of vertebroplasty or facet blocking.

Authors:  Biao Wang; Hua Guo; Li Yuan; Dageng Huang; Haiping Zhang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Vertebroplasty in multiple myeloma: outcomes in a large patient series.

Authors:  R J McDonald; A T Trout; L A Gray; A Dispenzieri; K R Thielen; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures.

Authors:  David F Kallmes; Bryan A Comstock; Patrick J Heagerty; Judith A Turner; David J Wilson; Terry H Diamond; Richard Edwards; Leigh A Gray; Lydia Stout; Sara Owen; William Hollingworth; Basavaraj Ghdoke; Deborah J Annesley-Williams; Stuart H Ralston; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Pain course in conservatively treated patients with back pain and a VCF on the spine radiograph (VERTOS III).

Authors:  Alexander Venmans; P N M Lohle; W J van Rooij
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.