| Literature DB >> 29805926 |
Maimoona Siddiqui1, Ahmed S Bukhari2, Ibrahim Shamael2, Zubana A Shah3, Neil Maken4.
Abstract
Objective To obtain the perception of nurses on the use of Facebook as a learning tool. Materials & methods We conducted a pilot observational study in which data were collected through a detailed course evaluation and feedback survey questionnaire. Twelve stroke care nurses were enrolled in a stroke course specifically designed to provide participants with information and knowledge about stroke unit nursing care. Firstly, a closed Facebook group consisting of the participants and facilitators was created. An activity in accordance with the course content was posted in the group daily. Before the start of the course, a pre-course test was conducted. The four-week course culminated in a graded written examination. Its results were compared with the pre-course test. A detailed feedback questionnaire was given to the participants at the end of the course, which was specifically designed to elicit perceptions of nurses about the use of Facebook as a learning tool. Results Of the 12 enrolled nurses, 10 completed the certification and the post-course feedback evaluation. Facebook was used by all participants as a platform to view and study the course contents. The timing of the course activities was rated "very good" by three and 'good' by six of 10 participants. However, one of the major issues faced by five participants was problematic internet access. The overall rating of the course was "very good" by five participants, "good" by three, and "satisfactory" by two of 10 participants. The post-course test showed that nine of 10 candidates passed with scores >70% compared to only two candidates getting scores >50% in the pre-course test. Conclusion Facebook use enabled participants to study the material when their schedule permitted them. The online teaching and facilitation were ideal for our full-time stroke unit nurses as reflected by their improved post-course test results.Entities:
Keywords: asia; blended learning; facebook; islamabad; pakistan; stroke course; stroke unit nurse
Year: 2018 PMID: 29805926 PMCID: PMC5963944 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Course content and activities.
NIHSS: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale
| Serial number | Learning Objectives | Teaching/Learning Activities |
| 1 | Basic anatomy and physiology of central nervous system and peripheral nervous system | Interactive lecture and online reading material |
| 2 | What is stroke? Recognition of stroke, assessment and monitoring of stroke patients, common causes and risk factors of stroke | Interactive lecture and online reading material |
| 3 |
What is Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)?
Components of GCS Importance of GCS How to Monitor GCS | Interactive lecture, online reading material and online videos |
| 4 | Examination of patient including GCS and NIHSS score calculation | Online videos |
| 5 | Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) indications, dosage, and contraindications | Interactive lecture and online reading material |
| 6 | Nursing care of stroke patients in first 72 hours | Online reading material and online videos |
| 7 | Stroke prevention | Online reading material and online videos |
| 8 | Complications after stroke | Online reading material, online videos and a small group activity |
| 9 | Principles and strategies in stroke rehabilitation | Online reading material, online videos and a small group activity |
Feedback questionnaire.
| Question | Possible Answers |
| Did you complete the course? |
Yes No |
| Did you find Facebook group helpful in your course? |
Yes No |
| Which browser did you use for viewing online material? |
Microsoft Internet Explorer Safari Google Chrome Other |
| What was your internet connection type? |
WIFI LAN 3G/4G |
| Did you have any problems in accessing the online material? |
Yes No If yes please explain (Descriptive Question) |
| Were you able to see the video portions of the course? |
Yes No If no please explain (Descriptive question) |
| Overall rating of the course |
Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor |
| Rating of components of the course: | |
|
Timing of activities |
Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor |
|
Content |
Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor |
|
Online and small group interactions |
Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor |
|
Clarity of instructions |
Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor |
|
Sequence of activities |
Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor |
| Which activity/activities did you find most useful? Why? |
Descriptive question |
| Indicate your experience in the course for the following statements: | |
|
My access to internet to work on the course was sufficient and unproblematic. |
Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely |
|
The information received before and during the course was accurate, clear and on time. |
Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely |
|
The instructions were clear. |
Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely |
| Overall how would you describe the course in your own words? |
Descriptive question |
| What is your qualification? |
Descriptive question |
| Work experience in years. |
Descriptive question |
Figure 1Rating of components of the course.
Figure 2Pre-course and post-course test scores.