Literature DB >> 29805753

Identification of radiation responsive genes and transcriptome profiling via complete RNA sequencing in a stable radioresistant U87 glioblastoma model.

Ninh B Doan1, Ha S Nguyen1, Hisham S Alhajala2, Basem Jaber3, Mona M Al-Gizawiy4, Eun-Young Erin Ahn5, Wade M Mueller1, Christopher R Chitambar2, Shama P Mirza6, Kathleen M Schmainda4,7.   

Abstract

The absence of major progress in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) is partly attributable to our poor understanding of both GBM tumor biology and the acquirement of treatment resistance in recurrent GBMs. Recurrent GBMs are characterized by their resistance to radiation. In this study, we used an established stable U87 radioresistant GBM model and total RNA sequencing to shed light on global mRNA expression changes following irradiation. We identified many genes, the expressions of which were altered in our radioresistant GBM model, that have never before been reported to be associated with the development of radioresistant GBM and should be concertedly further investigated to understand their roles in radioresistance. These genes were enriched in various biological processes such as inflammatory response, cell migration, positive regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, apoptosis, positive regulation of T-cell migration, positive regulation of macrophage chemotaxis, T-cell antigen processing and presentation, and microglial cell activation involved in immune response genes. These findings furnish crucial information for elucidating the molecular mechanisms associated with radioresistance in GBM. Therapeutically, with the global alterations of multiple biological pathways observed in irradiated GBM cells, an effective GBM therapy may require a cocktail carrying multiple agents targeting multiple implicated pathways in order to have a chance at making a substantial impact on improving the overall GBM survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acid ceramidase; acid ceramidase inhibitors; carmofur; glioblastoma; radioresistance

Year:  2018        PMID: 29805753      PMCID: PMC5955095          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma (GBM), with an overall survival of less than 1.5 years and a 5-year survival rate of 5%, is the most common, malignant primary cancer of the central nervous system in adults, with an estimated 12,120 new diagnoses in the United States alone in 2016 [1-3]. The current standard treatment regimen for GBM consists of maximal safe surgical resection, followed by the Stupp regimen, which consists of radiation therapy combined with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide [4, 5]. Despite this, recurrence—characterized by radioresistance—is inevitable [6, 7]. To elucidate the underlying mechanism of radioresistance, we recently established a stable, radioresistant GBM model and also presented evidence partly attributing the radioresistance of GBM cells to radiation-induced upregulation of tumor promoters acid ceramidase (ASAH1) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) [8, 9]. ASAH1 is a lysosomal cysteine amidase that converts ceramides, which trigger senescence and apoptosis, into sphingosine and free fatty acids [10-17]. Subsequently, sphingosine is phosphorylated by sphingosine kinase 1 (SPHK1) or 2 (SPHK2) to form a tumor promoter, S1P [10-15]. However, the radiation effects on global gene expression at the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) level in a stable radioresistant GBM model have never been investigated. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has become a powerful technique for transcriptome profiling of cell lines of interest to explain phenotypic variations [18, 19]. This study used RNA-seq to reveal many crucial radiation-responsive genes that may enable GBM cells to acquire resistance to radiation, providing the essential basis for further investigations of the role of these differential mRNA expressions in acquiring radioresistance.

RESULTS

Irradiation of GBM cells induced differential expression of 1094 radiation-responsive genes

We previously generated and described a stable radioresitant GBM model. Briefly, U87 cells received a total radiation of 10 Gy to generate radioresistant U87-10gy cells. Over the course of weeks, most cells died and less than ~1% of cells survived the irradiation. These radioresitant U87-10 gy cells were allowed to grow to confluence and were perpetuated for experiments. Total RNAs from U87 and U87-10 gy cells were harvested and subjected to further analysis. To screen for global mRNA changes following irradiation, we profiled transcriptomes of the control U87 cell line and its derivatives irradiated U87-10gy cells via RNA sequencing (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Using genes with twofold changes or greater with statistically significant values (P < 0.05) as criteria, we identified 1094 radiation responsive genes that were upregulated or downregulated in U87-10gy vs U87 cells. Among these 1094 radiation responsive genes, 427 were upregulated and 667 were downregulated (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).
Figure 1

Clustered heat map of RNA-seq transcriptomes of U87 and U87-10gy cells

U87 and U87-10gy cells were subjected to RNA sequencing. Experiments were performed in triplicates, and only genes with statically significant changes (~2000 genes) were utilized for the heat map. Green: relatively high expression, Red: relatively low expression. (P < 0.05)

Clustered heat map of RNA-seq transcriptomes of U87 and U87-10gy cells

U87 and U87-10gy cells were subjected to RNA sequencing. Experiments were performed in triplicates, and only genes with statically significant changes (~2000 genes) were utilized for the heat map. Green: relatively high expression, Red: relatively low expression. (P < 0.05)

Upregulation of genes promoting tumor aggressiveness and invasion following irradiation

In an effort to categorize genes based on their functions, we performed a gene ontology analysis. This analysis revealed that upregulated genes were enriched in inflammatory response, cell migration, positive regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, cell proliferation, cell growth, positive regulation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, response to hypoxia, activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase activity, metalloendopeptidase activity, cellular response to fibroblast growth factor stimulus, cellular response to transforming growth factor beta stimulus, cellular response to tumor necrosis factor, and ribonuclease A activity genes (Tables 1 and 2, and Supplementary Tables 2 and 4).
Table 1

Enriched gene ontology categories of differentially expressed genes following irradiation based on sets of statistically significant upregulated and downregulated genes (P < 0.05)

Differentially ExpressedCategoryP-value
GO:0007165: Signal transduction6.90E–04
GO:0006351: Transcription, DNA-templated7.40E–03
GO:0008152: Metabolic process1.50E–04
GO:0006915: Apoptotic process6.60E–04
DownregulatedGO:0007155: Cell adhesion1.50E–03
GO:0072332: Intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediator1.10E–02
GO:0045746: Negative regulation of Notch signaling pathway7.00E–02
GO:2000406: Positive regulation of T-cell migration4.10E–02
GO:0010759: Positive regulation of macrophage chemotaxis5.00E–02
GO:0002457: T-cell antigen processing and presentation9.60E–02
GO:0002282: Microglial cell activation involved in immune response9.60E–02
GO:0006954: Inflammatory response1.60E–04
GO:0016477: Cell migration2.90E–04
GO:0010718: Positive regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition4.90E–03
GO:0001525: Angiogenesis2.00E–02
GO:0008283: Cell proliferation2.30E–02
GO:0016049: Cell growth3.00E–02
UpregulatedGO:0090263: Positive regulation of canonical Wnt signaling pathway4.10E–02
GO:0001666: Response to hypoxia2.90E–02
GO:0000187: Activation of MAPK activity7.50E–02
GO:0004222: Metalloendopeptidase activity5.70E–04
GO:0004522: Ribonuclease A activity8.00E–02
GO:0071356: Cellular response to tumor necrosis factor2.30E–04
GO:0044344: Cellular response to fibroblast growth factor stimulus2.50E–02
GO:0071560: Cellular response to transforming growth factor beta stimulus1.90E–02

Experiments were performed in triplicates.

Table 2

Upregulated genes of selected enriched gene ontology categories following irradiation are shown based on sets of statistically significant changes (P < 0.05)

Gene Ontology CategoryP-valueFold changeGene symbolGene description
GO:0010718:Positive regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition4.90E–032.32BAMBIBMP and activin membrane bound inhibitor
2GLIPR2GLI pathogenesis related 2
2.23AXIN2axin 2
4.78COL1A1collagen type I alpha 1 chain
2.79TGFB3transforming growth factor beta 3
GO:0001525: Angiogenesis2.00E–022.46CXCL8C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8
5.1EPHB3EPH receptor B3
2.2EPHB4EPH receptor B4
5.79ACKR3atypical chemokine receptor 3
2CSPG4chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4
2.48COL8A1collagen type VIII alpha 1 chain
3NRXN3neurexin 3
3.16NDNFneuron derived neurotrophic factor
3.68NRP2neuropilin 2
2.611SERPINE1serpin family E member 1
3.2ZC3H12Azinc finger CCCH-type containing 12A
GO:0016049: Cell growth3.00E–0214.44ROS1ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase
3.07EDN1endothelin 1
2.43IL7Rinterleukin 7 receptor
3.16NDNFneuron derived neurotrophic factor
2.79TGFB3transforming growth factor beta 3
GO:0008283: Cell proliferation2.30E–022.18E2F8E2F transcription factor 8
4.84ERGERG, ETS transcription factor
14.44ROS1ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase
4.47ALKanaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase
2.23AXIN2axin 2
3CDC25Acell division cycle 25A
2.02CSPG4chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4
4.19CYP1A1cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 1
3.23DLX5distal-less homeobox 5
2.14FSCN1fascin actin-bundling protein 1
2.76FGF5fibroblast growth factor 5
2.62GRPRgastrin releasing peptide receptor
5.56MYH10myosin heavy chain 10
2.47PDK1pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1
2.25UHRF1ubiquitin like with PHD and ring finger domains 1
GO:0004222: Metalloendopeptidase activity5.70E–043ADAM12ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12
2.79ADAM19ADAM metallopeptidase domain 19
2.59ADAMTS1ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 1
2.73ADAMTS14ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 14
2.25BMP1bone morphogenetic protein 1
3.15MMP12matrix metallopeptidase 12
5.55MMP3matrix metallopeptidase 3
5.69MMP7matrix metallopeptidase 7
2.35MMEmembrane metalloendopeptidase
2.4TSHZ2teashirt zinc finger homeobox 2
GO:0001666: Response to hypoxia2.90E–025.69ABAT4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase
2.73BNIP3BCL2 interacting protein 3
5.6CA9carbonic anhydrase 9
4.17CYP1A1cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 1
3.84EGLN3egl-9 family hypoxia inducible factor 3
2.25LOXL2lysyl oxidase like 2
2.72MUC1mucin 1, cell surface associated
10.81POSTNperiostin
2.79TGFB3transforming growth factor beta 3
1.80HIF-1αHypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha
GO:0016477: Cell migration2.90E–042.32BAMBIBMP and activin membrane bound inhibitor
2.39EPHA3EPH receptor A3
5.1EPHB3EPH receptor B3
4.84ERGERG, ETS transcription factor
2.95WWC1WW and C2 domain containing 1
2.06BDKRB1bradykinin receptor B1
2CSPG4chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4
2.41COL5A1collagen type V alpha 1 chain
2.14FSCN1fascin actin-bundling protein 1
3.66LCP1lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1
3.3PODXLpodocalyxin like
4.48PSG2pregnancy specific beta-1-glycoprotein 2
2.83SDC1syndecan 1

Experiments were performed in triplicates.

Experiments were performed in triplicates. Experiments were performed in triplicates. Many genes involved in enhancement of tumor aggressiveness and invasion were significantly induced by irradiation (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 2). For example, the upregulation of BNIP3, MMP3, MMP7, MMP15, TGFBI, NOTCH2, AKT1, AKT3, TNFAIP3, RRM2, CXCL8, FOXM1, HMOX1, PRMT5, KDM2B, CERS6, SPHK1, ZBTB18, and PDK1 have been linked to radioresistance and increased aggressiveness of irradiated GBM cells [20-40]. In their study of irradiated GBM cells, Maachani et al. revealed FOXM1 confers radioresistance in GBM cells [31]. AKT1 and PDK1 induce resistant to chemotherapy such as temozolomide [39, 40]. In addition, AKT1 plays a major role in DNA repair of double-stranded breaks [40].

Tumor suppressor, immune response, P-53-dependent apoptosis, and cell adhesion genes are enriched in the pool of downregulated genes

The gene ontology analysis was conducted to analyze differentially expressed genes. Compared with control U87 cells, downregulated genes in irradiated U87-10gy cells were enriched in signal transduction, transcription DNA-templated, metabolic pathway, apoptotic process, cell adhesion, intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediator, positive regulation of T-cell migration, positive regulation of macrophage chemotaxis, T-cell antigen processing and presentation, and microglial cell activation involved in immune response genes (Tables 1 and 3, and Supplementary Tables 3 and 5).
Table 3

Downregulated genes of selected enriched gene ontology categories following irradiation are shown based on sets of statistically significant changes (P < 0.05)

Gene Ontology CategoryP-valueFold changeGene symbolGene description
GO:0006915: Apoptotic process6.60E–044.30E–01BBC3BCL2 binding component 3
7.90E–02DCCDCC netrin 1 receptor
1.90E–01PYCARDPYD and CARD domain containing
4.10E–01TRAF5TNF receptor associated factor 5
1.30E–01XAF1XIAP associated factor 1
4.10E–01BEX2brain expressed X-linked 2
2.80E–01CASP1caspase 1
1.60E–01CTSHcathepsin H
2.30E–01C5AR1complement C5a receptor 1
1.50E–01ELMO1engulfment and cell motility 1
4.50E–01IL1Binterleukin 1 beta
2.60E–01MAP2K6mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 6
4.70E–01NR4A1nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 1
3.70E–01PMAIP1phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate-induced protein 1
1.10E–03SFRP2secreted frizzled related protein 2
4.80E–01YARStyrosyl-tRNA synthetase
GO:0072332: Intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediator1.10E–023.50E–01PERPPERP, TP53 apoptosis effector
1.90E–01PYCARDPYD and CARD domain containing
3.70E–01PMAIP1phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate-induced protein 1
4.40E–01ZMAT1zinc finger matrin-type 1
2.60E–01ZNF385Dzinc finger protein 385D
GO:2000406: Positive regulation of T-cell migration4.10E–021.90E–01PYCARDPYD and CARD domain containing
1.40E–01TNFRSF14TNF receptor superfamily member 14
2.50E–01ITGA4integrin subunit alpha 4
GO:0002457: T-cell antigen processing and presentation9.60E–023.80E–01ICAM1intercellular adhesion molecule 1
1.30E–01RFTN1raftlin, lipid raft linker 1
GO:0002282: Microglial cell activation involved in immune response9.60E–024.70E–01IL33interleukin 33
4.90E–01TLR3toll like receptor 3
GO:0010759: Positive regulation of macrophage chemotaxis5.00E–028.50E–02CMKLR1chemerin chemokine-like receptor 1
2.40E–01C5AR1complement C5a receptor 1
8.50E–02TNFSF18tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 18

Experiments were performed in triplicates.

Experiments were performed in triplicates. Downregulation of tumor suppressor genes after irradiation has been described as a major mechanism for GBM cells to enhance their survival [41]. Highlighting the negative association with survival, RNA-seq revealed downregulation of the following representative well-known genes involved in the negative regulation of cell survival: S1PR1, PARP15, HOXA11, and ADGRG1 [42-45]. Improved prognosis in patients with GBMs has been associated with the high expression of S1PR1, suggesting its function as a tumor suppressor [42]. GBMs become less susceptible to radiation and chemotherapy when HOXA11 expression is suppressed [44]. The loss of ADGRG1's function promotes radioresistance of glioma-initiating cells [45].

DISCUSSION

Investigators have shown that irradiation of GBM cells can transform them into a more malignant form [6, 7]. In their transcriptome analysis of glioma, Ma et al. describe that radioresistance of gliomas within hours following irradiation may be due to the inactivation of early proapoptotic molecules and late activation of antiapoptotic genes [41]. It is important to note that in their study, the transcriptome analysis was performed within hours (6–48 hours) following radiation, while in our study, the analysis was done in a stable radioresistant GBM model that we recently developed [8]. Since their study performed analysis within hours following radiation, their findings likely include cells that would not survive radiation long-term. On the other hand, our stable radioresistant GBM model selected out these cells, and our final RNA-seq involved only truly radioresistant cells. Consistent with the Ma et al. study, the aberrant gene expressions observed in irradiated U87-10gy cells were enriched in genes involved in enhancing tumor malignancy and invasion. Similar to the Ma et al. study, we also found upregulation of antiapoptotic genes BNIP3 and SOD2 in irradiated U87-10gy cells. Exclusively enriched in upregulated genes are positive regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition, metalloendopeptidase activity genes, and response to hypoxia genes. Upregulated metalloproteases mRNA expressions include MME, MMP2, MMP3, MMP7, MMP12, ADAM9, and ADAM12. Metalloproteases have been strongly implicated in encouraging tumor invasion and metastasis of many cancers by degrading the extracellular protein matrix [21, 22]. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition, a process that overlaps with the acquirement of stem cell properties characterized by increased cell motility and resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy, is an important inducer of cancer stem-like phenotypes and is associated with an aggressive phenotype in glioma [46, 47]. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition is typically induced by TGFB3, which was also upregulated in irradiated U87-10gy cells [47, 48]. Hypoxia, which is frequent in GBM, is a major inducer of epithelial to mesenchymal transition as well and is also a main promoter of GBM invasion [47, 49]. In GBM, hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) and carbonic anhydrase 9 expressions are induced by hypoxia and promote angiogenesis, migration, cell survival, proliferation, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, and radio- and chemoresistance [49, 50]. In line with this, we found HIF-1α and carbonic anhydrase 9 expressions upregulated in irradiated U87-10gy cells (Table 2). Downregulated genes were enriched in tumor suppressor, positive regulation of immune response, P-53 dependent apoptosis, and cell adhesion genes (Tables 1 and 3). On the basis of gene ontology, we uncovered 16 genes associated with apoptosis, 10 genes associated with positive regulation of immune response, and 29 genes associated with cell adhesion that were downregulated (Tables 1 and 3). Ma et al. suggest that suppressing apoptotic potential through gene expression regulation of irradiated cells helps explain the radioresistant nature of irradiated GBM cells [41]. Consistent with our findings, multiple studies have identified downregulation of some of the apoptotic genes discovered in this study to play major roles in attenuating GBM apoptosis, especially for BBC3, DCC, BEX2, CASP1, IL1B, and SFRP2 [51-56]. For example, in their study of GBM cell migration and proliferation, investigators identified BBC3 as a potent inhibitor of cell migration and proliferation in GBM [51]. Downregulation of DCC expression was suggested as an important marker in tumor malignancy and recurrence in astrocytic tumors [52]. To further enhance their survival, GBM cells produce an immunosuppressive microenvironment to escape immune surveillance [57]. One mechanism to achieve this objective is through the secretion of transforming growth factor B (TGF-β) to block T-cell activation and proliferation [57]. In addition to TGF-β, we uncovered many other downregulated genes involved in the activation of the immune system, especially genes mediating T-cell antigen processing and presentation, that may help with immune evasion of radioresistant GBM cells (Tables 2 and 3). A previous study of our recently described radioresistant GBM model revealed that radiation-induced accumulation of the ASAH1 protein level, as measured by immunoblotting, may enable GBM cells to survive radiation [8, 9]. However, RNA-seq data demonstrated no changes in the mRNA expression of ASAH1 between U87 and U87-10gy cells. This discrepancy can be explained by the reported absence of the high degree of, or even negative correlation (~40% on average), between mRNA and protein expressions [19, 58–62]. Similar mRNA levels can produce varied levels of protein of interest depending on the regulations between the transcripts and protein product such as the ability of the cells to stabilize the mRNA, the rates of translation, the rates of protein degradation, etc. [19, 59, 60]. As seen in this study, irradiation of U87 cells resulted in significant gene expression changes, which may alter post-transcriptional regulation and ultimately affect the resultant protein expression level. Therapeutically, with the global alterations of multiple biological pathways observed in irradiated GBM cells, an effective GBM therapy may require a cocktail carrying multiple agents targeting multiple implicated pathways in order to have a chance at making a substantial impact on improving the overall GBM survival. These findings of aberrantly expressed mRNAs following irradiation provide a crucial comprehensive starting point to understand the complex mechanism of radioresistance in GBM, and should be combined with immunoblotting or other techniques of direct measurement of protein levels to supply a more accurate picture of how cells can be altered to be radioresistant. Many mRNAs, whose expressions were altered in our radioresistant GBM model, have never before been reported to be associated with the development of radioresistant GBM and should be further investigated to understand their roles in radioresistance. The absence of a major progress in the treatment of GBM is partly attributable to our poor understanding of both GBM tumor biology and the acquirement of treatment resistance in recurrent GBMs. Recurrent GBMs are characterized by their resistance to radiation. In this study, we used an established stable radioresistant GBM model to shed light on global mRNA expression changes after irradiation. Many mRNAs, the expressions of which were altered in our radioresistant U87 GBM model, have never before been reported to be associated with the development of radioresistant GBMs and should be concertedly further investigated to understand their roles in radioresistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents and cells

The U87 and U87-10gy glioblastoma cell lines were cultured in Eagle's minimum essential medium containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum. Culture medium materials were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. (Grand Island, NY, USA).

RNA library preparation and sequencing

RNA sequencing libraries were prepared using the TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer`s protocol. The RNA concentration was measured with a NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Integrity was assessed using an Agilent 2200 TapeStation instrument (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Briefly, polyA mRNA from an input of 500 ng high-quality total RNA (RINe>8) was purified and fragmented. First strand complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) syntheses were performed at 25° C for 10 minutes, 42° C for 15 minutes, and 70° C for 15 minutes, using random hexameres and ProtoScript II Reverse Transcriptase (New England BioLabs Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA). In a second strand cDNA synthesis, the RNA templates were removed and a second replacement strand was generated by incorporating deoxyuridine triphosphate (in place of deoxythymidine triphosphate, to keep strand information) to generate ds cDNA. The blunt-ended cDNA was cleaned up from the second strand reaction mix with beads. Next, the 3′ ends of the cDNA were adenylated and then indexing adaptors were ligated. Polymerase chain reactions (15 cycles of 98° C for 10 seconds, 60° C for 30 seconds, and 72° C for 30 seconds) were used to selectively enrich those DNA fragments that have adapter molecules on both ends and to amplify the amount of DNA in the library. The libraries were quantified using the Promega QuantiFluor dsDNA System on a Quantus Fluorometer (Promega, Madison, WI). The size and purity of the libraries were analyzed using the High Sensitivity D1000 Screen Tape on an Agilent 2200 TapeStation instrument. The libraries were normalized, pooled, and subjected to cluster, and pair read sequencing was performed for 150 cycles on a HiSeq4000 instrument (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Generation of the stable radioresistant GBM model

The method and detail to generate the stable radioresistant GBM model was previously described by us [8]. U87 cell lines were grown to confluence and then irradiated with a Pantak HF320 X-ray machine (Agfa NDT Ltd., Reading, UK) operating at 300 kV at a dosage of 2.09 Gy/min to a total radiation dose of 10 Gy, to generate the U87-10gy cell lines. Following radiation, these irradiated cells were allowed to recover and to grow to confluence. The U87-10gy cell line was stable for continued passages for further studies.

Gene ontology analysis

The gene ontology enrichment analysis was performed using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7, NIAIS/NIH (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/). The heatmap was performed with a web-based program (http://www.heatmapper.ca/expression).
  62 in total

Review 1.  Global signatures of protein and mRNA expression levels.

Authors:  Raquel de Sousa Abreu; Luiz O Penalva; Edward M Marcotte; Christine Vogel
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2009-10-01

Review 2.  Acid ceramidase and human disease.

Authors:  Jae-Ho Park; Edward H Schuchman
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-09-01

Review 3.  Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a review of natural history and management options.

Authors:  Lewis C Hou; Anand Veeravagu; Andrew R Hsu; Victor C K Tse
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Epigenetic Regulation of ZBTB18 Promotes Glioblastoma Progression.

Authors:  Vita Fedele; Fangping Dai; Anie P Masilamani; Dieter H Heiland; Eva Kling; Ana M Gätjens-Sanchez; Roberto Ferrarese; Leonardo Platania; Doostkam Soroush; Hyunsoo Kim; Sven Nelander; Astrid Weyerbrock; Marco Prinz; Andrea Califano; Antonio Iavarone; Markus Bredel; Maria S Carro
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 5.  Ceramide in apoptosis: an overview and current perspectives.

Authors:  Benjamin J Pettus; Charles E Chalfant; Yusuf A Hannun
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2002-12-30

6.  Purification, characterization, and biosynthesis of human acid ceramidase.

Authors:  K Bernardo; R Hurwitz; T Zenk; R J Desnick; K Ferlinz; E H Schuchman; K Sandhoff
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-05-12       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Key tumor suppressor genes inactivated by "greater promoter" methylation and somatic mutations in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Rafael Guerrero-Preston; Christina Michailidi; Luigi Marchionni; Curtis R Pickering; Mitchell J Frederick; Jeffrey N Myers; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Tal Hadar; Maartje G Noordhuis; Veronika Zizkova; Elana Fertig; Nishant Agrawal; William Westra; Wayne Koch; Joseph Califano; Victor E Velculescu; David Sidransky
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 4.528

8.  Inhibition of REST Suppresses Proliferation and Migration in Glioblastoma Cells.

Authors:  Dianbao Zhang; Ying Li; Rui Wang; Yunna Li; Ping Shi; Zhoumi Kan; Xining Pang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Inhibitor of Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase Sensitizes Glioblastoma Cells to Temozolomide via Activating ROS/JNK Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Jun Feng; Peng-Fei Yan; Hong-Yang Zhao; Fang-Cheng Zhang; Wo-Hua Zhao; Min Feng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Acid ceramidase is a novel drug target for pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  Ninh B Doan; Ha S Nguyen; Andrew Montoure; Mona M Al-Gizawiy; Wade M Mueller; Shekar Kurpad; Scott D Rand; Jennifer M Connelly; Christopher R Chitambar; Kathleen M Schmainda; Shama P Mirza
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-11
View more
  9 in total

1.  Molecular Mechanism of Inhibition of Acid Ceramidase by Carmofur.

Authors:  Alexey Dementiev; Andrzej Joachimiak; Ha Nguyen; Alexei Gorelik; Katalin Illes; Saman Shabani; Michael Gelsomino; Eun-Young Erin Ahn; Bhushan Nagar; Ninh Doan
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  New insights into radioresistance in breast cancer identify a dual function of miR-122 as a tumor suppressor and oncomiR.

Authors:  Isidro X Perez-Añorve; Claudia H Gonzalez-De la Rosa; Ernesto Soto-Reyes; Fredy O Beltran-Anaya; Oscar Del Moral-Hernandez; Marisol Salgado-Albarran; Oscar Angeles-Zaragoza; Juan A Gonzalez-Barrios; Daniel A Landero-Huerta; Margarita Chavez-Saldaña; Alejandro Garcia-Carranca; Nicolas Villegas-Sepulveda; Elena Arechaga-Ocampo
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 3.  Targeting Tumor Associated Macrophages to Overcome Conventional Treatment Resistance in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Hélène Grégoire; Loris Roncali; Audrey Rousseau; Michel Chérel; Yves Delneste; Pascale Jeannin; François Hindré; Emmanuel Garcion
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 4.  Sphingosine-1-Phosphate in the Tumor Microenvironment: A Signaling Hub Regulating Cancer Hallmarks.

Authors:  Laura Riboni; Loubna Abdel Hadi; Stefania Elena Navone; Laura Guarnaccia; Rolando Campanella; Giovanni Marfia
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  Perspective of mesenchymal transformation in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Roel G W Verhaak; Sun Ha Paek; Yona Kim; Frederick S Varn; Sung-Hye Park; Byung Woo Yoon; Hye Ran Park; Charles Lee
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 7.801

Review 6.  Molecular Markers of Therapy-Resistant Glioblastoma and Potential Strategy to Combat Resistance.

Authors:  Ha S Nguyen; Saman Shabani; Ahmed J Awad; Mayank Kaushal; Ninh Doan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Irradiation of pediatric glioblastoma cells promotes radioresistance and enhances glioma malignancy via genome-wide transcriptome changes.

Authors:  Hisham S Alhajala; Ha S Nguyen; Saman Shabani; Benjamin Best; Mayank Kaushal; Mona M Al-Gizawiy; Eun-Young Erin Ahn; Jeffery A Knipstein; Shama Mirza; Kathleen M Schmainda; Christopher R Chitambar; Ninh B Doan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-09-25

8.  Elevated HDAC activity and altered histone phospho-acetylation confer acquired radio-resistant phenotype to breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Asmita Sharda; Mudasir Rashid; Sanket Girish Shah; Ajit Kumar Sharma; Saurav Raj Singh; Poonam Gera; Murali Krishna Chilkapati; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 6.551

9.  Multiple Irradiation Affects Cellular and Extracellular Components of the Mouse Brain Tissue and Adhesion and Proliferation of Glioblastoma Cells in Experimental System In Vivo.

Authors:  Maxim O Politko; Alexandra Y Tsidulko; Oxana A Pashkovskaya; Konstantin E Kuper; Anastasia V Suhovskih; Galina M Kazanskaya; Lyubov S Klyushova; Dmitry K Sokolov; Alexander M Volkov; Evgenii E Kliver; Alexander A Zheravin; Svetlana V Aidagulova; Elvira V Grigorieva
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.