| Literature DB >> 29805281 |
Hyun-Wook Kim1,2, Derico Setyabrata1, Yong-Jae Lee3, Yuan H Brad Kim1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of alkaline-treated sugarcane bagasse fiber on physicochemical and textural properties of meat emulsion with different fat levels. Crude sugarcane bagasse fiber (CSF) was treated with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH2)) to obtain alkaline-treated sugarcane bagasse fiber (ASF). The two types of sugarcane bagasse fiber (CSF and ASF) were incorporated at 2% levels in pork meat emulsions prepared with 5%, 10% and 20% fat levels. Alkaline-treatment markedly increased acid detergent fiber content (p=0.002), but significantly decreased protein, fat, ash and other carbohydrate contents. ASF exhibited significantly higher water-binding capacity, but lower oil-binding and emulsifying capacities than CSF. Meat emulsions formulated with 10% fat and 2% sugarcane bagasse fiber had equivalent cooking loss and textural properties to control meat emulsion (20% fat without sugarcane bagasse fiber). The two types of sugarcane bagasse fiber had similar impacts on proximate composition, cooking yield and texture of meat emulsion at the same fat level, respectively (p>0.05). Our results confirm that sugarcane bagasse fiber could be a functional food ingredient for improving physicochemical and textural properties of meat emulsion, at 2% addition level. Further, the altered functional properties of alkaline-treated sugarcane bagasse fiber had no impacts on physicochemical and textural properties of meat emulsions, regardless of fat level at 5%, 10% and 20%.Entities:
Keywords: alkaline-treatment; dietary fiber; fat replacer; meat emulsion; sugarcane bagasse fiber
Year: 2018 PMID: 29805281 PMCID: PMC5960829 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2018.38.2.315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Proximate composition of sugarcane bagasse fiber (n=3)
| Traits | CSF | ASF | SEM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture (g/100 g dry matter) | 5.09 | 6.18 | 0.246 | 0.004 |
| Protein (g/100 g dry matter) | 4.05 | 3.59 | 0.105 | 0.017 |
| Fat (g/100 g dry matter) | 0.51 | 0.27 | 0.058 | 0.034 |
| Ash (g/100 g dry matter) | 4.63 | 2.50 | 0.479 | 0.002 |
| Acid detergent fiber (g/100 g dry matter) | 65.29 | 73.09 | 1.749 | 0.002 |
| Other carbohydrates (g/100 g dry matter) | 25.52 | 20.55 | 1.114 | 0.002 |
CSF, crude sugarcane bagasse fiber; ASF, alkaline-treated sugarcane bagasse fiber; SEM, standard error of mean.
Fig. 1(A) Water-binding capacity, (B) oil-binding capacity, and (C) emulsifying capacity of sugarcane bagasse fiber. (n=3).
*p<0.05; **p<0.01. CSF, crude sugarcane bagasse fiber; ASF, alkaline-treated sugarcane bagasse fiber.
Fig. 2Micrographs of 1% sugarcane bagasse fiber suspension.
CSF, crude sugarcane bagasse fiber; ASF, alkaline-treated sugarcane bagasse fiber.
pH, proximate composition and calorie content of cooked meat emulsions prepared with sugarcane bagasse fiber (n=3)
| Traits | Control[ | 20% fat level | 10% fat level | 5% fat level | SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% CSF | 2% ASF | 2% CSF | 2% ASF | 2% CSF | 2% ASF | ||||
| pH value | 6.13 | 6.11 | 6.19 | 6.09 | 6.14 | 6.14 | 6.09 | 0.011 | NS |
| Proximate composition | |||||||||
| Moisture (g/100 g) | 60.12[ | 58.00[ | 58.18[ | 66.23[ | 65.94[ | 70.22[ | 70.81[ | 1.161 | <0.0001 |
| Protein (g/100 g) | 10.59[ | 10.96[ | 11.35[ | 8.11[ | 8.07[ | 6.32[ | 6.76[ | 0.444 | <0.0001 |
| Fat (g/100 g) | 27.50[ | 26.42[ | 26.38[ | 23.04[ | 23.63[ | 19.63[ | 20.88[ | 0.501 | <0.0001 |
| Ash (g/100 g) | 1.99[ | 1.93[ | 2.07[ | 1.56[ | 1.40[ | 1.21[ | 1.15[ | 0.075 | <0.0001 |
| Calorie content (kcal/100 g) | 289.8[ | 281.6[ | 282.8[ | 239.9[ | 245.0[ | 201.9[ | 214.9[ | 7.350 | <0.0001 |
1) Control, meat emulsion formulated with 20% back fat without sugarcane bagasse fiber.
a-c Means within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
CSF, crude sugarcane bagasse fiber; ASF, alkaline-treated sugarcane bagasse fiber; SEM, standard error of mean; NS, non-significance (p>0.05).
Emulsion stability and cooking loss of meat emulsions prepared with sugarcane bagasse fiber (n=3)
| Traits | Control[ | 20% fat level | 10% fat level | 5% fat level | SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% CSF | 2% ASF | 2% CSF | 2% ASF | 2% CSF | 2% ASF | ||||
| Emulsion stability | |||||||||
| Water release (%) | 9.25[ | 7.58[ | 6.67[ | 12.53[ | 11.27[ | 17.45[ | 16.93[ | 1.113 | 0.000 |
| Fat release (%) | 0.64[ | 0.55[ | 0.45[ | 0.58[ | 0.65[ | 1.00[ | 1.85[ | 0.134 | 0.003 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 7.23[ | 6.08[ | 5.70[ | 7.14[ | 7.52[ | 8.25[ | 7.97[ | 0.231 | 0.002 |
1) Control, meat emulsion formulated with 20% back fat without sugarcane bagasse fiber.
a-c Means within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
CSF, crude sugarcane bagasse fiber; ASF, alkaline-treated sugarcane bagasse fiber; SEM, standard error of mean.
Textural properties of cooked meat emulsions prepared with sugarcane bagasse fiber (n=3)
| Traits | Control[ | 20% fat level | 10% fat level | 5% fat level | SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% CSF | 2% ASF | 2% CSF | 2% ASF | 2% CSF | 2% ASF | ||||
| Hardness ( | 61.98[ | 82.04[ | 73.06[ | 45.08[ | 50.85[ | 38.53[ | 40.00[ | 3.802 | 0.004 |
| Springiness (ratio) | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.010 | NS |
| Cohesiveness | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.008 | NS |
| Gumminess ( | 15.23[ | 17.08[ | 16.62[ | 11.60[ | 13.41[ | 10.46[ | 10.48[ | 0.692 | 0.004 |
| Chewiness ( | 11.55[ | 14.02[ | 13.51a | 9.49[ | 11.23[ | 8.47[ | 8.87[ | 0.568 | 0.013 |
1) Control, meat emulsion formulated with 20% back fat without sugarcane bagasse fiber.
a-d Means within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
CSF, crude sugarcane bagasse fiber; ASF, alkaline-treated sugarcane bagasse fiber; SEM, standard error of mean; NS, non-significance (p>0.05).