Literature DB >> 29804810

Supergene Evolution Triggered by the Introgression of a Chromosomal Inversion.

Paul Jay1, Annabel Whibley2, Lise Frézal3, María Ángeles Rodríguez de Cara4, Reuben W Nowell5, James Mallet6, Kanchon K Dasmahapatra7, Mathieu Joron8.   

Abstract

Supergenes are groups of tightly linked loci whose variation is inherited as a single Mendelian locus and are a common genetic architecture for complex traits under balancing selection [1-8]. Supergene alleles are long-range haplotypes with numerous mutations underlying distinct adaptive strategies, often maintained in linkage disequilibrium through the suppression of recombination by chromosomal rearrangements [1, 5, 7-9]. However, the mechanism governing the formation of supergenes is not well understood and poses the paradox of establishing divergent functional haplotypes in the face of recombination. Here, we show that the formation of the supergene alleles encoding mimicry polymorphism in the butterfly Heliconius numata is associated with the introgression of a divergent, inverted chromosomal segment. Haplotype divergence and linkage disequilibrium indicate that supergene alleles, each allowing precise wing-pattern resemblance to distinct butterfly models, originate from over a million years of independent chromosomal evolution in separate lineages. These "superalleles" have evolved from a chromosomal inversion captured by introgression and maintained in balanced polymorphism, triggering supergene inheritance. This mode of evolution involving the introgression of a chromosomal rearrangement is likely to be a common feature of complex structural polymorphisms associated with the coexistence of distinct adaptive syndromes. This shows that the reticulation of genealogies may have a powerful influence on the evolution of genetic architectures in nature.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heliconius; chromosomal inversion; gene flow; genomic; hybridization; introgression; mimicry; phylogenomic; supergene

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29804810     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  42 in total

1.  Mutation load at a mimicry supergene sheds new light on the evolution of inversion polymorphisms.

Authors:  Paul Jay; Mathieu Chouteau; Annabel Whibley; Héloïse Bastide; Hugues Parrinello; Violaine Llaurens; Mathieu Joron
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Massive haplotypes underlie ecotypic differentiation in sunflowers.

Authors:  Marco Todesco; Gregory L Owens; Natalia Bercovich; Jean-Sébastien Légaré; Shaghayegh Soudi; Dylan O Burge; Kaichi Huang; Katherine L Ostevik; Emily B M Drummond; Ivana Imerovski; Kathryn Lande; Mariana A Pascual-Robles; Mihir Nanavati; Mojtaba Jahani; Winnie Cheung; S Evan Staton; Stéphane Muños; Rasmus Nielsen; Lisa A Donovan; John M Burke; Sam Yeaman; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Aristaless Controls Butterfly Wing Color Variation Used in Mimicry and Mate Choice.

Authors:  Erica L Westerman; Nicholas W VanKuren; Darli Massardo; Ayşe Tenger-Trolander; Wei Zhang; Ryan I Hill; Michael Perry; Erick Bayala; Kenneth Barr; Nicola Chamberlain; Tracy E Douglas; Nathan Buerkle; Stephanie E Palmer; Marcus R Kronforst
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Recombination drives the evolution of mutational robustness.

Authors:  Sonia Singhal; Shawn M Gomez; Christina L Burch
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2019-01-02

5.  Mimicry diversification in Papilio dardanus via a genomic inversion in the regulatory region of engrailed-invected.

Authors:  Martijn J T N Timmermans; Amrita Srivathsan; Steve Collins; Rudolf Meier; Alfried P Vogler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Mass of genes rather than master genes underlie the genomic architecture of amphibian speciation.

Authors:  Christophe Dufresnes; Alan Brelsford; Daniel L Jeffries; Glib Mazepa; Tomasz Suchan; Daniele Canestrelli; Alfredo Nicieza; Luca Fumagalli; Sylvain Dubey; Iñigo Martínez-Solano; Spartak N Litvinchuk; Miguel Vences; Nicolas Perrin; Pierre-André Crochet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genomic architecture and introgression shape a butterfly radiation.

Authors:  Nathaniel B Edelman; Paul B Frandsen; Michael Miyagi; Bernardo Clavijo; John Davey; Rebecca B Dikow; Gonzalo García-Accinelli; Steven M Van Belleghem; Nick Patterson; Daniel E Neafsey; Richard Challis; Sujai Kumar; Gilson R P Moreira; Camilo Salazar; Mathieu Chouteau; Brian A Counterman; Riccardo Papa; Mark Blaxter; Robert D Reed; Kanchon K Dasmahapatra; Marcus Kronforst; Mathieu Joron; Chris D Jiggins; W Owen McMillan; Federica Di Palma; Andrew J Blumberg; John Wakeley; David Jaffe; James Mallet
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Evolution at two time frames: ancient structural variants involved in post-glacial divergence of the European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa).

Authors:  Alan Le Moan; Dorte Bekkevold; Jakob Hemmer-Hansen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 9.  The Genomic Architecture and Evolutionary Fates of Supergenes.

Authors:  Juanita Gutiérrez-Valencia; P William Hughes; Emma L Berdan; Tanja Slotte
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Genomic evidence of human selection on Vavilovian mimicry.

Authors:  Chu-Yu Ye; Wei Tang; Dongya Wu; Lei Jia; Jie Qiu; Meihong Chen; Lingfeng Mao; Feng Lin; Haiming Xu; Xiaoyue Yu; Yongliang Lu; Yonghong Wang; Kenneth M Olsen; Michael P Timko; Longjiang Fan
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 15.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.