| Literature DB >> 29804545 |
Stefano Masi1,2, Georgios Georgiopoulos3, Tauseef Khan4, William Johnson5, Andrew Wong6, Marietta Charakida4, Peter Whincup7, Alun D Hughes8, Marcus Richards6, Rebecca Hardy6, John Deanfield4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between long-term exposure to whole body or central obesity and cognitive function, as well as its potential determinants, remain controversial. In this study, we assessed (1) the potential impact of 30 years exposure to different patterns of whole body and central adiposity on cognitive function at 60-64 years, (2) whether trajectories of central adiposity can provide additional information on later cognitive function compared to trajectories of whole body adiposity, and (3) the influence of vascular phenotypes on these associations.Entities:
Keywords: Obesity; cognitive function; lifetime risk; vascular phenotypes; waist circumference
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29804545 PMCID: PMC5971427 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1059-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 8.775
Participant characteristics by BMI category at the age of 60–64 years
| N | Entire sample | Normal (30.5%) | Overweight (42.5%) | Obese (27.0%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex (%) | 1249 | 46.3 | 37.0 | 54.7 | 43.8 |
|
| Height (m) | 1249 | 1.68 (0.1) | 1.68 (0.1) | 1.69 (0.1) | 1.67 (0.1) | 0.44 |
| Weight (kg) | 1249 | 78.4 (14.9) | 65.3 (8.2) | 78.1 (9.2) | 94.3 (12.5) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1249 | 27.6 (4.6) | 23.0 (1.5) | 27.2 (1.4) | 33.6 (3.6) |
|
| Waist circumference (cm) | 1249 | 96.6 (12.6) | 84.6 (8.2) | 96.0 (7.6) | 109.2 (9.8) |
|
| Hip circumference (cm) | 1249 | 105.8 (9.5) | 97.7 (4.9) | 104.5 (5.1) | 115.7 (9.0) |
|
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 1249 | 0.91 (0.1) | 0.87 (0.1) | 0.92 (0.1) | 0.95 (0.1) |
|
| Heart rate (bpm) | 1248 | 68.4 (11.3) | 67.2 (11.4) | 68.3 (10.6) | 69.8 (12.1) |
|
| SBP (mmHg) | 1248 | 134.8 (17.9) | 129.3 (16.7) | 136.6 (18.1) | 138 (17.9) |
|
| DBP (mmHg) | 1248 | 77.2 (9.7) | 74.5 (9.4) | 78.2 (9.4) | 78.7 (10.1) |
|
| Education (% above A-level) | 909 | 61.3 | 61.9 | 65 | 54.6 | 0.14 |
| Smoking (% current smokers) | 1171 | 34.9 | 37.7 | 33.7 | 34.3 | 0.34 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1186 | 5.69 (1.2) | 5.91 (1.1) | 5.7 (1.2) | 5.4 (1.3) |
|
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1156 | 3.52 (1.0) | 3.66 (0.9) | 3.55 (1.0) | 3.3 (1.1) |
|
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1186 | 1.62 (0.41) | 1.81 (0.4) | 1.59 (0.4) | 1.43 (0.3) |
|
| Triglyceridesa (mmol/L) | 1162 | 1.1 (0.8–1.5) | 0.8 (0.6–1.1) | 1.1 (0.8–1.5) | 1.3 (1.0–1.9) |
|
| HbA1ca (%) | 1157 | 5.8 (5.5–6) | 5.7 (5.5–5.9) | 5.7 (5.5–6.0) | 5.9 (5.6–6.2) |
|
| Adiponectina (μg/mL) | 1183 | 12.9 (7.6–19.5) | 16.6 (10.9–25.1) | 12.1 (7.0–17.8) | 10.2 (6.3–16.4) |
|
| Leptina (ng/mL) | 1183 | 12.1 (6.6–23.6) | 7.8 (4.1–13.7) | 11.6 (6.4–19.1) | 26.1 (14.1–43.2) |
|
| Levels of physical activity (in the last 4 weeks) | ||||||
| • Not physical active | 1223 | 703 (58.15) | 205 (54.81) | 297 (58.01) | 201 (62.23) | 0.375 |
| PWV (m/s) | 1249 | 8.2 (1.51) | 7.95 (1.58) | 8.27 (1.5) | 8.37 (1.42) |
|
| cIMT (mm) | 900 | 0.69 (0.12) | 0.67 (0.12) | 0.69 (0.13) | 0.71 (0.11) |
|
| VMT (number of words) | 1227 | 24.7 (6.1) | 26.0 (6.0) | 24.5 (6.2) | 23.6 (5.7) |
|
| LSSTa (targets) | 1249 | 282 (231–307) | 287 (231–329) | 239 (231–329) | 263 (174–288) |
|
| S-RT (s) | 1234 | 281 (63.5) | 279 (64.5) | 278 (60.2) | 289 (67.2) |
|
| C-RT (s) | 1230 | 612 (76.5) | 607 (77.4) | 608 (72.9) | 622 (80.6) |
|
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation, N (%) or amedian (IQR). Comparisons between normal weight, overweight and obese groups were performed by test for trend using linear regression
Numbers in italic indicate statistical significance
SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, cIMT common carotid artery intima-media thickness, PWV pulse wave velocity, VMT verbal memory test, LSST letter search speed test, C-RT choice reaction time test, S-RT simple reaction time test
Cross-sectional associations of BMI with carotid intima-media thickness and pulse wave velocity with verbal memory, letter search speed, choice and simple reaction test at age 60–64 years
| MODEL 1 | MODEL 2 | MODEL 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| |
| VASCULAR MEASURES | ||||||
| 1. cIMT (mm) |
|
| 0.002 (−0.0003 to 0.005) | 0.085 |
|
|
| 2. PWV (m/s) |
|
| 0.018 (−0.009 to 0.045) | 0. 192 | 0.014 (−0.015 to 0.043) | 0.355 |
| COGNITIVE MEASURES | ||||||
| 1. VMT (n. of words) |
|
|
|
|
| < |
| 2. LSSTa (targets) |
|
|
|
| −0.004 (−0.009 to 0.001) | 0.117 |
| 3. RT (s) | ||||||
| a. Simple | 0.485 (−0.373 to 1.344) | 0.267 | 0.552 (−0.324 to 1.428) | 0.217 | 0.689 (−0.300 to 1.679) | 0.172 |
| b. Choice | 0.910 (−0.222 to 2.042) | 0.115 | 0.983 (−0.157 to 2.123) | 0.091 | 1.014 (−0.292 to 2.320) | 0.128 |
Linear regression models were used to assess associations between variables
MODEL 1 adjusted for sex, education, childhood cognition; MODEL 2 = MODEL 1 + adjustments for socioeconomic position at age 53, systolic blood pressure and heart rate at age 60–64; MODEL 3 (fully adjusted) = MODEL 2 + adjustments for total cholesterol, smoking, diabetes and levels of physical activity. In each model, inverse probability weighting was implemented to account for the probability of survival until the end of follow-up
Numbers in italics indicate statistical significance
cIMT common carotid artery intima-media thickness, PWV pulse wave velocity, VMT verbal memory test, LSST letter search speed test, RT reaction time test
aIndicates log transformed dependent variables
Cross-sectional associations of carotid intima-media thickness and pulse wave velocity with verbal memory test, letter search speed and reaction time at 60–64 years
| VMT (n. of words) | LSST a (targets) | S-RT (s) | C-RT (s) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| ||
| PWV | Model 1 |
|
| 0.004 (−0.018 to 0.026) | 0.701 | −0.958 (−3.676 to 1.760) | 0.489 | −1.871 (−5.485 to 1.741) | 0.309 |
| Model 2 |
|
| 0.006 (−0.020 to 0.032) | 0.629 | −0.344 (−3.402 to 2.714) | 0.825 | −1.357 (−5.270 to 2.557) | 0.496 | |
| Model 3 | −0.166 (0.461 to 0.129) | 0.270 | 0.007 (−0.022 to 0.036) | 0.634 | −0.029 (−3.417 to 3.359) | 0.987 | −1.148 (−5.710 to 2.749) | 0.492 | |
| cIMT | Model 1 | 0.220 (−3.470 to 3.912) | 0.906 | −0.036 (−0.218 to 0.145) | 0.695 | 6.819 (−27.267 to 40.906) | 0.694 | 16.606 (−32.294 to 65.507) | 0.505 |
| Model 2 | 0.487 (−3.162 to 4.136) | 0.793 | −0.049 (−0.235 to 0.138) | 0.607 | 10.673 (−24.072 to 45.418) | 0.546 | 21.282 (−27.069 to 69.635) | 0.388 | |
| Model 3 | 1.287 (−2.340 to 4.913) | 0.486 | −0.015 (−0.222 to 0.192) | 0.888 | 12.470 (−24.800 to 49.740) | 0.511 | 25.184 (−25.895 to 76.264) | 0.333 | |
Linear regression models were used to assess associations between variables
cIMT common carotid artery intima-media thickness, PWV pulse wave velocity, VMT verbal memory test, LSST letter search speed test, C-RT choice reaction time test, S-RT simple reaction time test
MODEL 1 adjusted for sex, education and childhood cognition; MODEL 2 = MODEL 1 + adjustments for socioeconomic position at age 53, systolic blood pressure and heart rate at age 60–64; MODEL 3 (fully adjusted) = MODEL 2 + adjustments for total cholesterol, smoking, diabetes and levels of physical activity. In each model, inverse probability weighting was implemented to account for the probability of survival until the end of follow-up
aIndicates log transformed dependent variables
Numbers in italics indicate statistical significance
Fig. 1a Patterns of overweight/obesity change and performance in the verbal memory test (VMT) at age 60–64 years. Data points represent mean number of words recalled and vertical bars indicate 95% CI for each group. O/O@36, O/O@43, O/O@53 and O/O@60–64 = Overweight/obesity since 36, 43, 53 and 60–64 years old, respectively; Never O/O = never overweight/obese; Lost/Non-regain = dropped and did not regain one category of BMI; Lost/Regain = dropped and regained one category of BMI. VMT = Verbal memory test. Results are adjusted for sex, childhood cognition and education, and inverse probability weighting was implemented to account for dropout due to death. Test for trend for O/O@36 to O/O@60–64: p < 0.0001. Pairwise comparison of Never O/O versus Lost/Non-regain (p = 0.9) and Lost/Regained (p = 0.002). Pairwise comparison of O/O@36 versus Lost/Non-regain (p = 0.007) and Lost/Regain (p = 0.9). Adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, PWV and cIMT did not affect these differences. b Patterns of waist circumference (WC) change and performance in the verbal memory test (VMT) at age 60–64 years. Data points represent mean number of words recalled and vertical bars indicate 95% CI for each group. HiWC@36, HiWC@43, HiWC@53 and HiWC@60–64 = elevated WC since 36, 43, 53 and 60–64 years old, respectively; Never HiWC = WC always normal; Lost/Non-regain = dropped and did not regain one category of WC; Lost/Regain = dropped and regained one category of WC. Results are adjusted for sex, childhood cognition and education, and inverse probability weighting was implemented to account for the probability of survival until the end of follow-up. Test for trend for HiWC@36 to HiWC@60–64: p < 0.001. Adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, PWV and cIMT did not affect these differences
Relationship between cognitive tests at age 60–64 years and residual changes in BMI between three time periods: BMI36–43 = 36–43 years, BMI43–53 = 43–53 years, and BMI53–60 to 64 = 53–60 to 64 years
| MODEL 1 | MODEL 2 | MODEL 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| |
| VMT | ||||||
| BMI36–43 | −0.216 (−0.629 to 0.198) | 0.306 | −0.161 (−0.553 to 0.231) | 0.421 | −0.199 (−0.632 to 0.234) | 0.367 |
| BMI43–53 | 0.065 (−0.390 to 0.520) | 0.780 | 0.068 (−0.378 to 0.514) | 0.763 | 0.098 (−0.393 to 0.590) | 0.694 |
| BMI53–60 to 64 |
|
|
|
| −0.380 (−0.839 to 0.078) | 0.104 |
| LSSTa | ||||||
| BMI36–43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BMI43–53 | −0.012 (−0.033 to 0.010) | 0.280 | −0.011 (−0.033 to 0.010) | 0.305 | −0.008 (−0.031 to 0.014) | 0.462 |
| BMI53–60 to 64 | 0.005 (−0.019 to 0.030) | 0.680 | 0.005 (−0.020 to 0.029) | 0.704 | 0.013 (−0.016 to 0.043) | 0.367 |
| S-RT | ||||||
| BMI36–43 | 2.116 (−1.973 to 6.206) | 0.310 | 2.205 (−1.903 to 6.312) | 0.290 | 3.701 (−0.836 to 8.238) | 0.110 |
| BMI43–53 | 1.638 (−2.437 to 5.714) | 0.430 | 1.775 (−2.377 to 5.928) | 0.402 | 2.387 (−2.079 to 6.853) | 0.294 |
| BMI53–60 to 64 | 0.698 (−3.119 to 4.514) | 0.720 | 1.142 (−2.672 to 4.955) | 0.557 | 1.859 (−2.514 to 6.233) | 0.404 |
| C-RT | ||||||
| BMI36–43 | −1.610 (−7.038 to 3.818) | 0.561 | −1.433 (−6.968 to 4.101) | 0.611 | −0.798 (−6.749 to 5.152) | 0.792 |
| BMI43–53 | 2.581 (−3.305 to 8.468) | 0.389 | 3.145 (−2.879 to 9.170) | 0.306 | 3.021 (−3.570 to 9.612) | 0.368 |
| BMI53–60 to 64 | 2.146 (−3.157 to 7.449) | 0.427 | 2.716 (−2.537 to 7.969) | 0.310 | 4.230 (−1.835 to 10.295) | 0.171 |
Linear regression models were used to assess associations between variables. Significant associations (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold
aIndicates log transformed dependent variables. MODEL 1 adjusted for sex, education and childhood cognition; MODEL 2 = MODEL 1 + adjustments for socioeconomic position at age 53, systolic blood pressure and heart rate at age 60–64; MODEL 3 (fully adjusted) = MODEL 2 + adjustments for total cholesterol, smoking, diabetes, diabetes duration and levels of physical activity. In each model, inverse probability weighting was implemented to account for dropout due to death
VMT verbal memory test, LSST letter search speed test, S-RT simple reaction time test, C-RT choice reaction time
Fig. 2Association of rate of change in waist circumference (WC) in three time periods (36–43 years, 43–53 years and 53–60 to 64 years) according to MODEL 1 with (a) verbal memory test (VMT), (b) letter search speed test (LSST), (c) simple reaction time test and (d) choice reaction time (C-RT) at age 60–64 years. β represents the slope of the linear regression and indicates the difference in units of the cognitive outcome for 1 standard deviation increase in WC in each interval
Relationship between cognitive tests at age 60–64 years and residual changes in waist circumference between three time periods: Waist36–43 = 36–43 years, Waist43–53 = 43–53 years, and Waist53–60 to 64 = 53–60 to 64 years
| MODEL 1 | MODEL 2 | MODEL 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| |
| VMT | ||||||
| WC36–43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WC43–53 | −0.160 (−0.562 to 0.241) | 0.434 | −0.127 (−0.525 to 0.270) | 0.530 | −0.090 (−0.511 to 0.330) | 0.672 |
| WC53–60 to 64 |
|
|
|
| −0.358 (−0.766 to 0.049) | 0.085 |
| LSSTa | ||||||
| WC36–43 |
|
|
|
| −0.027 (−0.055 to 0.001) | 0.058 |
| WC43–53 | −0.001 (−0.026 to 0.024) | 0.932 | 0.0003 (−0.025 to 0.025) | 0.983 | 0.001 (−0.026 to 0.029) | 0.916 |
| WC53–60 to 64 | 0.012 (−0.016 to 0.040) | 0.395 | 0.013 (−0.015 to 0.041) | 0.372 | 0.018 (−0.014 to 0.051) | 0.273 |
| S-RT | ||||||
| WC36–43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WC43–53 | 1.604 (−2.445 to 5.654) | 0.437 | 1.718 (−2.408 to 5.844) | 0.414 | 2.466 (−2.002 to 6.936) | 0.279 |
| WC53–60 to 64 | 1.453 (−2.357 to 5.263) | 0.454 | 1.753 (−2.125 to 5.631) | 0.375 | 2.196 (−2.120 to 6.512) | 0.318 |
| C-RT | ||||||
| WC36–43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WC43–53 | 5.024 (−0.390 to 10.439) | 0.069 |
|
| 50.251 (−0.752 to 11.254) | 0.086 |
| WC53–60 to 64 | 1.670 (−3.389 to 6.728) | 0.517 | 1.940 (−3.090 to 6.971) | 0.449 | 30.589 (−1.963 to 9.141) | 0.205 |
Linear regression models were used to assess associations between variables
VMT verbal memory test, LSST letter search speed test, C-RT choice reaction time test, S-RT simple reaction time test
Significant associations (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold
aIndicates log transformed dependent variables
MODEL 1 adjusted for sex, education and childhood cognition; MODEL 2 = MODEL 1 + adjustments for socioeconomic position at age 53, systolic blood pressure and heart rate at age 60–64; MODEL 3 (fully adjusted) = MODEL 2 + adjustments for total cholesterol, smoking, diabetes, diabetes duration and levels of physical activity. In each model, inverse probability weighting was implemented to account for dropout due to death
Numbers in italics indicate statistical significance